Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$321.84
▲ $4.86 (+1.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:15 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$11.81B
Day Range
$313.14 - $321.93
52-Week Range
$238.34 - $374.80
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$312.25
Resistance
$374.80
AIT is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+22.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
61
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
56
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
44
Risk
62
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
74
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT) highlights its record-breaking financial performance, with the company reporting its strongest quarterly sales growth in over three years—up 10.4% year-over-year to $1.4 billion—while also receiving a rating upgrade to "Buy." However, the narrative includes mixed signals, such as a notable insider sell of $648K in shares and cautious discussions about future growth potential. Analysts praise its outperformance over five years but acknowledge potential headwinds.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
40
Fundamentals
74
Technical
44
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-5%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+23
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests **herding** dominates as AIT’s slight outperformance (+1.3%) relative to peers (+1.9%) aligns with crowd-driven momentum. The narrative-reality gap (14 points) hints at optimism outpacing fundamentals, while anchoring (3.6% above support) may reinforce reluctance to sell. Low FOMO/Panic scores (10/13) imply no extreme urgency or distress, but the gap raises caution. The key question: *Is the herd’s alignment with peers sustainable, or will divergence trigger rebalancing?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:08 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Quarterly sales climbed 10.4% year over year to $1.4 billion, with organic growth of 9.7% marking the strongest pace in more than three years."
"Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT) has been upgraded to a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), reflecting growing optimism about the company's earnings prospects."
"Applied Industrial Techs (NYSE:AIT) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 18.74% on an annualized basis."
"Peter C Wallace, Board Member at Applied Industrial Techs (NYSE:AIT), executed a substantial insider sell on August 27."
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 31/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological disagreements about risk, timing, and valuation. Bagehot and Nelson’s near-perfect scores highlight their focus on liquidity and cyclical positioning, suggesting they’d see resilience or a favorable market phase, while Smith and Loeb’s high marks imply long-term durability or capital preservation. In contrast, Graham’s low scores—even for his enterprising variant—signal a failure to meet his strict margin-of-safety criteria, while Fisher and Lynch’s disapproval underscores a lack of standout growth or undervaluation. Marks and Malkiel’s mixed views further split the debate: Marks warns of overpricing, while Malkiel dismisses the stock’s active-picking merit, leaving only a handful of methodologies (like Schwager’s trend-following approach) cautiously optimistic.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 87
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 80
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 80
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 74
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 73
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 66
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 58
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 55
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 51
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 47
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 40
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 33
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 5 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
30.3%
Operating Margin
11.1%
Net Margin
8.3%
EBITDA Margin
11.1%
ROE
22.3%
ROA
13.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$11.09
Cash
$127.13M
Total Debt
$262.30M
Current Ratio
2.58
Debt/Equity
0.14
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 14.8.2026 | $0.510 |
| 15.5.2026 | $0.510 |
| 13.2.2026 | $0.510 |
| 14.11.2025 | $0.460 |
| 15.8.2025 | $0.460 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.460 |
| 14.2.2025 | $0.460 |
| 15.11.2024 | $0.370 |
| 15.8.2024 | $0.370 |
| 14.5.2024 | $0.370 |
| 14.2.2024 | $0.370 |
| 14.11.2023 | $0.350 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$49.18
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$22.30
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
MT Newswires · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 23.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 23.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 21.8.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
StockStory · 20.8.2026
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 61/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AIT currently scores 61/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AIT's technical score is 44/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 22.3% — strong; Debt/equity: 0.14.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -6.8% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — AIT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallace Peter C | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 1,904 | -1,904 | $340.45 |
| Wallace Peter C | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 22,859 | -1,904 | $340.45 |
| Wells David K. | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 1,812 | -1,812 | $355.10 |
| Vasquez Jason W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.8.2026 | 7,700 | +7,700 | $53.87 |
| Vasquez Jason W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.8.2026 | 7,700 | -7,700 | — |
| Vasquez Jason W | Tax Withholding in Shares | 18.8.2026 | 2,774 | -2,774 | $354.35 |
| Ploetz Jon S | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 1,240 | +1,240 | — |
| Ploetz Jon S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.8.2026 | 450 | -450 | $352.35 |
| Loring Kurt W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 1,294 | +1,294 | — |
| Ploetz Jon S | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 1,023 | +1,023 | — |
| Wells David K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 1,870 | +1,870 | — |
| Schrimsher Neil A | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 3,089 | +3,089 | — |
| Schrimsher Neil A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.8.2026 | 4,876 | -4,876 | $352.35 |
| Wells David K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 2,153 | +2,153 | — |
| Schrimsher Neil A | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 10,313 | +10,313 | — |
| Loring Kurt W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 1,514 | +1,514 | — |
| Loring Kurt W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 458 | +458 | — |
| Vasquez Jason W | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.8.2026 | 341 | -341 | $352.35 |
| Ploetz Jon S | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 375 | +375 | — |
| Schrimsher Neil A | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 10,217 | +10,217 | — |
| Vasquez Jason W | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 1,028 | +1,028 | — |
| Vasquez Jason W | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 1,240 | +1,240 | — |
| Vasquez Jason W | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 375 | +375 | — |
| Loring Kurt W. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.8.2026 | 628 | -628 | $352.35 |
| Wells David K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 651 | +651 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
738,088 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 744,428 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
48.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology