Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$142.31
▼ $0.56 (-0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/19 09:38 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$11.80B
Day Range
$140.93 - $142.63
52-Week Range
$123.09 - $150.02
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$136.73
Resistance
$148.71
+2.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.36 (3y annualized return 7.7% / max drawdown 21.6%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
63
Value
55
Momentum
50
Risk
56
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
62
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of American Financial Group, Inc. (AFG) has highlighted its strong financial performance and strategic investor-friendly moves. The company’s stock neared a 52-week high, supported by its diversified property and casualty insurance operations, pricing strength, and excess capital. AFG also raised its dividend by 10.2% and continued share buybacks, signaling confidence amid market uncertainty. Additionally, the firm completed the sale of Charleston Harbor Resort & Marina, expecting a $125 million pretax gain, reinforcing its focus on core earnings growth.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about American Financial Group, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
62
Technical
50
Valuation
55
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+8%
Market Narrative
64
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+22
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant herding behavior suggests traders are passively following sector trends, with AFG’s underperformance relative to peers reinforcing alignment. Confirmation bias and anchoring coexist, as traders may overemphasize narrative optimism while ignoring stagnant fundamentals. The key question is whether the narrative gap (+21) will sustain momentum or if technical proximity to support (2.7%) could trigger a re-evaluation. Low panic and FOMO scores indicate no extreme emotional reactions, but the absence of overconfidence hints at cautious, not aggressive, positioning.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:12 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"American Financial Group had a good second quarter, rewarding investors while also preparing for a tougher market."
"AFG expects to recognize pretax core operating earnings of approximately $125 million ($1.20 per share, after tax) from the sale"
"American Financial Near 52-Week High: Time to Hold the Stock?"
"Carl H. Lindner III and S. Craig Lindner... will participate in the 2026 Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Insurance Conference"
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 19/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for AFG reflects deep philosophical splits between methodologies. At the top, Bagehot’s liquidity focus and Nelson’s cyclical timing both see it as a resilient or opportunistic pick, scoring above 80, while Housel’s patient compounder lens also endorses it as a long-term hold. Meanwhile, Graham’s strict valuation rules and Lynch’s growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar reject it outright, scoring below 30, mirroring Fisher’s and Schwager’s skepticism about quality or setup. The middle-ground—Marks, Veblen, and even the Enterprising Investor Graham—caution that while the business may have merit, either expectations are inflated or the risk-reward balance isn’t compelling enough. This tension highlights whether AFG is a defensive play (Bagehot) or a speculative gamble (Livermore’s trend aversion) or simply a stock where timing (Nelson) or patience (Housel) matters more than mechanical rules.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 92
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 82
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 70
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 67
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 62
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 54
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 51
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 45
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 37
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 36
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 32
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 19
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 4 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$136.73
Range Bottom
$148.71
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
13.1%
Net Margin
10.3%
EBITDA Margin
14.2%
ROE
17.5%
ROA
2.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$10.08
Cash
$1.73B
Total Debt
$1.82B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.38
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.7.2026 | $0.880 |
| 14.7.2026 | $0.880 |
| 15.4.2026 | $0.880 |
| 14.4.2026 | $0.880 |
| 13.2.2026 | $1.500 |
| 12.2.2026 | $1.500 |
| 15.1.2026 | $0.880 |
| 14.1.2026 | $0.880 |
| 17.11.2025 | $2.000 |
| 16.11.2025 | $2.000 |
| 15.10.2025 | $0.880 |
| 14.10.2025 | $0.880 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$57.72
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$51.54
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
StockStory · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Motley Fool · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
MT Newswires · 31.8.2026
Business Wire · 31.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Business Wire · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
American Financial Group, Inc. (AFG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AFG currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AFG's technical score is 50/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; ATR: 1.6% of price; Debt/equity: 0.38.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.36 (3y annualized return 7.7% / max drawdown 21.6%); Revenue growth (last year): -1.8%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -4.6%.
Yes — AFG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 11 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hertzman Brian S. | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 950 | -950 | $142.87 |
| LINDNER CARL H III | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 81,373 | -81,373 | $144.28 |
| LINDNER CARL H III | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 3,060,068 | -81,373 | $144.28 |
| LINDNER CARL H III | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 8,627 | -8,627 | $144.66 |
| LINDNER CARL H III | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 3,141,441 | -8,627 | $144.66 |
| Weiss Mark A | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 2,813 | -2,813 | $144.76 |
| Gillis Michelle A | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 2,247 | -2,247 | $139.00 |
| Gillis Michelle A | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 13,135 | -2,247 | $139.00 |
| Thompson David Lawrence Jr | Open Market Sale | 23.6.2026 | 11,370 | -11,370 | $135.05 |
| Thompson David Lawrence Jr | Open Market Sale | 23.6.2026 | 584,098 | -11,370 | $135.05 |
| VON LEHMAN JOHN I | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| Martin Mary Beth | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| JOSEPH GREGORY G | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| Murray Amy Y | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| Nwankwo Evans N | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| Newport Roger K | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| VERITY WILLIAM W | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,299 | +1,299 | — |
| VON LEHMAN JOHN I | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 13,762 | +1,299 | — |
| VERITY WILLIAM W | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 14,418 | +1,299 | — |
| JOSEPH GREGORY G | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 48,592 | +1,299 | — |
| Newport Roger K | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 4,961 | +1,299 | — |
| Martin Mary Beth | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 11,493 | +1,299 | — |
| Nwankwo Evans N | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 7,646 | +1,299 | — |
| Murray Amy Y | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 3,950 | +1,299 | — |
| Hertzman Brian S. | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 1,663 | -1,663 | $133.70 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,585,979 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,715,751 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
64.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology