Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$14.97
▲ $0.17 (+1.1%)
Market data updated: 09/18 02:09 PM
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$21.84B
Day Range
$14.69 - $15.09
52-Week Range
$12.26 - $23.05
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
AERO is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-25.0% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 4/12 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
MACD
MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.5% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
12d ago · $15.79
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 13 to 41 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
47
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
60
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Grupo Aeroméxico has centered on its August passenger traffic decline, which raised concerns about performance. The airline also announced plans to submit a $100 million share repurchase program for shareholder approval. Additionally, there was significant attention on the U.S. court’s ruling upholding the antitrust immunity for its joint venture with Delta Air Lines, reinforcing strategic partnerships. Analysts compared Aeroméxico’s stock positioning against Delta’s in this context.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Grupo Aeromexico S.A.B. de C.V. American Depositary Shares (each representing ten (10) Common Shares). News trend score: 92. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
54
Fundamentals
—
Technical
47
Valuation
—
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-13%
Market Narrative
67
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+17
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
AERO’s market behavior suggests **herding dominance**, with FOMO and euphoria as secondary forces. The stock’s slight underperformance relative to peers today (despite positive momentum and sentiment) implies traders are aligning with broader sector trends rather than independent conviction. The **narrative-reality gap (23 points)** hints at optimism outpacing fundamentals, but the lack of extreme volatility or panic signals keeps selling pressure muted. The key question: *Is this herd lagging or a tactical pause before renewed momentum?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 02:04 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Delta Air Lines (DAL) vs. Grupo Aeroméxico (AERO): Which Airline Stock is Better Positioned after the Cross-Border Partnership Win?"
"Grupo Aeromexico to Submit $100 Million Share Repurchase Program for Shareholder Approval"
"Delta Air Lines, Aeromexico Joint Venture Antitrust Immunity Upheld by US Court"
"Aeroméxico (AERO) Stock May Trade At A Discount To Fair Value"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Thorstein Veblen — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles behind each methodology, the model estimates that Veblen’s focus on genuine value creation yields a strong 80 score, while Mackay’s attention to crowd dynamics results in a moderately high 68. Mid‑cycle assessments from Howard Marks and the mixed view from his cycle‑specific lens land in the mid‑50s, whereas Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot, and Graham’s enterprising variant all sit at the neutral 50 mark due to insufficient data for their more granular analyses. The efficient‑market perspective of Malkiel & Bogle, along with Nelson’s overbought warning, pull the outlook down to the 30‑40 range, and the trend‑following, risk‑averse, and setup‑driven frameworks of Livermore, Loeb, Schwager, and Smith further depress scores, culminating in Housel’s zero, reflecting extreme volatility concerns.
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 69
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 60
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 49
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 30
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 26
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 20
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 216 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
MT Newswires · 24.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 24.8.2026
Benzinga · 21.8.2026
MT Newswires · 21.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 16.8.2026
Zacks · 14.8.2026
Zacks · 13.8.2026
Zacks · 13.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.8.2026
MarketBeat · 14.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 13.7.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Grupo Aeromexico S.A.B. de C.V. American Depositary Shares (each representing ten (10) Common Shares) (AERO) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for AERO specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
AERO's technical score is 47/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; RSI 50.9 — healthy positive momentum; Price is above the SAR point — uptrend.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.5% of price; Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AERO.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 15 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murray Aaron James | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 355,600 | -355,600 | $1.58 |
| Murray Aaron James | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 1,262,530 | -355,600 | $1.58 |
| Borrego Andres | Open Market Purchase | 3.8.2026 | 7,700 | +7,700 | $15.83 |
| Borrego Andres | Open Market Purchase | 3.8.2026 | 15,700 | +7,700 | $15.83 |
| Moak Donald Lee | Open Market Purchase | 27.7.2026 | 6,600 | +6,600 | $15.15 |
| Moak Donald Lee | Open Market Purchase | 27.7.2026 | 6,600 | +6,600 | $15.15 |
| Murray Aaron James | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 250,000 | -250,000 | $1.55 |
| Murray Aaron James | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 100,000 | -100,000 | $1.59 |
| Murray Aaron James | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 1,718,130 | -250,000 | $1.55 |
| Murray Aaron James | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 1,618,130 | -100,000 | $1.59 |
| Murray Aaron James | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 400,000 | -400,000 | $1.50 |
| Murray Aaron James | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 200,000 | -200,000 | $1.52 |
| Murray Aaron James | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 2,168,130 | -400,000 | $1.50 |
| Murray Aaron James | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 1,968,130 | -200,000 | $1.52 |
| Tricio Haro Eduardo | Open Market Purchase | 19.3.2026 | 500,000 | +500,000 | $1.32 |
| Murray Aaron James | Open Market Purchase | 19.3.2026 | 6,336 | +6,336 | $12.86 |
| Borrego Andres | Open Market Purchase | 19.3.2026 | 8,000 | +8,000 | $12.83 |
| Murray Aaron James | Open Market Purchase | 19.3.2026 | 664 | +664 | $12.88 |
| Tricio Haro Eduardo | Open Market Purchase | 19.3.2026 | 500,000 | +500,000 | $1.32 |
| CONESA ANDRES | Open Market Purchase | 19.3.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | $12.91 |
| Borrego Andres | Open Market Purchase | 19.3.2026 | 8,000 | +8,000 | $12.83 |
| Murray Aaron James | Open Market Purchase | 19.3.2026 | 6,336 | +6,336 | $12.86 |
| CONESA ANDRES | Open Market Purchase | 19.3.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | $12.91 |
| Tricio Haro Eduardo | Open Market Purchase | 19.3.2026 | 15,166,980 | +500,000 | $1.32 |
| Tricio Haro Eduardo | Open Market Purchase | 19.3.2026 | 500,000 | +500,000 | $1.32 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
663,289 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 699,712 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 36.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology