Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$5.03
▲ $0.18 (+3.7%)
Market data updated: 09/20 02:04 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$256.18M
Day Range
$4.81 - $5.12
52-Week Range
$4.36 - $8.80
Beta
—
Next Earnings
10.11.2026
Support
$4.68
Resistance
$7.62
AENT is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-28.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$0.72 vs. price $5.03 (-114.3%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $5.03
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from -21 to 29 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
34
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
19
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
64
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation highlights its focus on the entertainment collectibles market, emphasizing growth and strategic initiatives. The company has announced a fiscal year 2026 earnings conference call, showcasing a 21% sales increase driven by collectibles. Key events include its presence at Comic-Con 2026, where it unveiled exclusive projects like the *Masters of the Universe* SteelBook and a *Project Hail Mary* restock, alongside partnerships and investor outreach through webinars and Bloomberg TV appearances. Its expansion into preservation platforms for vinyl, Funko, and robot-made collectibles underscores its role as a leading omnichannel distributor.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
35
Psychology
52
Fundamentals
64
Technical
19
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-5%
Market Narrative
64
Fundamental Reality
35
Narrative Gap
+29
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for AENT suggests a **psychological stalemate**—FOMO and panic selling scores are nearly equal (26 vs. 35), reflecting mixed signals: elevated volume and positive sentiment coexist with negative momentum and moderate volatility. The **narrative gap** (realityScore 54 vs. narrativeScore 33) implies traders may be overestimating fundamentals relative to technical weakness. The key open question is whether the **neutral RSI (39)** and **Bollinger %B (0.19)** signal exhaustion of selling pressure or a continuation of cautious trading. Neither herding nor euphoria dominate, suggesting a lack of clear momentum-driven participation.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:19 PM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Alliance Entertainment and Virax Interviews Aired on the RedChip Small Stocks, Big Money™ Show on Bloomberg TV"
"Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation... supplying more than 340,000 unique SKUs across physical media, video games, toys, licensed merchandise, and exclusive collectibles"
"Alliance Entertainment Unveils Masters of the Universe SteelBook® Artwork and Announces Surprise Limited Project Hail Mary Restock at San Diego Comic-Con 2026"
"Alliance Entertainment Touts 21% Sales Jump, Collectibles Push at Investor Event"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits the historical methodologies into two starkly opposing camps: the bullish camp, led by Mackay, Veblen, and Lynch, who see it as a growth opportunity with favorable cycle positioning and no obvious crowd-driven mania, while the bearish camp—including Livermore, Loeb, and Housel—views it as a high-risk, volatile bet that violates core principles of trend-following, risk management, and patience. The middle ground, represented by Marks (both cycle and general) and Schwager, acknowledges some merit but flags concerns about risk/reward balance or cycle timing, while Graham and Fisher dismiss it outright for failing fundamental quality or valuation thresholds. The extreme divergence—from a near-bullish 85 to a flat 0—suggests the stock either excites growth-focused investors or alarms those prioritizing stability, liquidity, or trend alignment.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 87
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 53
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 48
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 41
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 35
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 30
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 26
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 22
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 20
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 18
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 17
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 275 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
1008.1%
Net Margin
483.6%
EBITDA Margin
1074.5%
ROE
11.2%
ROA
3.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.26
Cash
$814.00K
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.34
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$5.03
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$0.72
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-114.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-2.64M | $-2.42M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-2.55M | $-2.15M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-2.52M | $-1.95M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-2.54M | $-1.80M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-2.60M | $-1.69M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-2.77M
Terminal Value
$-41.00M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-26.65M
Enterprise Value
$-36.65M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-36.65M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$2.28
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.08
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 5 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
ChartMill · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Motley Fool · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AENT currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AENT's estimated fair value is -$0.72, which is 114.3% below the current price of $5.03. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AENT's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Operating margin: 1008.1% — strong; Net margin: 483.6% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$0.72 vs. price $5.03 (-114.3%); ATR: 9.0% of price; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -13.3%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AENT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 21 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bangalore Sheila | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.11.2025 | 2,630 | +2,630 | — |
| Kozko Dmitry | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.11.2025 | 2,630 | +2,630 | — |
| Bangalore Sheila | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.11.2025 | 2,630 | +2,630 | — |
| Kozko Dmitry | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.11.2025 | 2,630 | +2,630 | — |
| Black Robert R. | Open Market Purchase | 18.6.2025 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $3.10 |
| Black Robert R. | Open Market Purchase | 17.6.2025 | 343 | +343 | $3.15 |
| Black Robert R. | Open Market Purchase | 16.6.2025 | 157 | +157 | $3.15 |
| Ogilvie Bruce A Jr | Open Market Purchase | 2.6.2025 | 3,956 | +3,956 | $0.15 |
| Ogilvie Bruce A Jr | Open Market Purchase | 30.5.2025 | 20,000 | +20,000 | $0.15 |
| Black Robert R. | Open Market Purchase | 28.5.2025 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $2.70 |
| Ogilvie Bruce A Jr | Open Market Purchase | 28.5.2025 | 7,166 | +7,166 | $0.15 |
| Ogilvie Bruce A Jr | Open Market Purchase | 27.5.2025 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $2.70 |
| Ogilvie Bruce A Jr | Open Market Purchase | 27.5.2025 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $0.17 |
| Black Robert R. | Open Market Purchase | 27.5.2025 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $2.67 |
| Black Robert R. | Open Market Purchase | 20.5.2025 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $2.80 |
| Walker Jeffrey Clinton | Open Market Purchase | 6.3.2025 | 50,040 | +50,040 | $0.25 |
| Walker Jeffrey Clinton | Open Market Purchase | 5.3.2025 | 100 | +100 | $0.26 |
| Walker Jeffrey Clinton | Open Market Purchase | 4.3.2025 | 7,557 | +7,557 | $0.27 |
| Walker Jeffrey Clinton | Open Market Purchase | 3.3.2025 | 42,303 | +42,303 | $0.29 |
| Walker Jeffrey Clinton | Open Market Purchase | 27.2.2025 | 32,500 | +32,500 | $39,297.00 |
| Walker Jeffrey Clinton | Open Market Purchase | 27.2.2025 | 52,500 | +52,500 | $0.28 |
| Walker Jeffrey Clinton | Open Market Purchase | 26.2.2025 | 36,684 | +36,684 | $38,533.00 |
| Walker Jeffrey Clinton | Open Market Purchase | 26.2.2025 | 28,476 | +28,476 | $0.26 |
| Ogilvie Bruce A Jr | Open Market Purchase | 25.2.2025 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $0.20 |
| Black Robert R. | Open Market Purchase | 24.2.2025 | 500 | +500 | $3.65 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
329,736 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 335,981 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
28.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 36.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology