Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$375.72
▲ $13.07 (+3.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:42 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$182.06B
Day Range
$364.00 - $376.01
52-Week Range
$223.47 - $445.91
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
Support
$348.00
Resistance
$400.69
ADI is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+50.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 21/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 39.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $112.80 vs. price $375.72 (-70.0%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (79/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
81/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
90/100
Analog Quality
+2.5%
Median 40D Outcome
52/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+2.0% … +13.7%
🟡 Base
7%
-0.9% … -0.9%
🔴 Bearish
40%
-9.0% … -3.4%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +1.6%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Echo #2 — Trend Acceleration
2 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.0% | -0.9% … +5.7% | +0.4% |
| 10D | 53% (30%–75%) | +2.0% | -3.7% … +6.3% | +0.7% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.6% | -3.6% … +7.1% | +1.1% |
| 40D | 53% (30%–75%) | +2.5% | -2.2% … +9.8% | +2.1% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +3.8% | -4.3% … +12.2% | +3.9% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-09 | 81/100 | Consolidation | +15.1% | +27.5% |
| 2022-02-09 | 75/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -10.5% | -7.2% |
| 2017-07-20 | 74/100 | Consolidation | -4.1% | +10.2% |
| 2022-04-07 | 74/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -3.2% | -10.3% |
| 2022-03-24 | 74/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -5.9% | -10.1% |
| 2018-03-02 | 73/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -0.9% | +5.4% |
| 2022-05-24 | 73/100 | Consolidation | -10.1% | +3.8% |
| 2023-11-13 | 73/100 | Consolidation | +11.9% | +14.3% |
| 2022-04-28 | 72/100 | Consolidation | +2.2% | +0.8% |
| 2020-05-18 | 72/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +13.2% | +10.0% |
| 2020-10-05 | 72/100 | Consolidation | +1.6% | +25.4% |
| 2019-11-04 | 72/100 | Consolidation | -1.0% | -1.5% |
| 2022-07-26 | 71/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +1.6% | -12.6% |
| 2022-02-25 | 71/100 | Downtrend | +2.2% | -0.4% |
| 2026-04-01 | 69/100 | Consolidation | +25.5% | +22.2% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLK (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
68
Today
51
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🔎 What Changed (vs. 30 days ago)
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
25d ago · $374.05
Evidence: 0 bullish / 9 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
26d ago · $371.17
Evidence: 0 bullish / 10 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
27d ago · $373.09
Evidence: 0 bullish / 10 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
27d ago · $373.09
Evidence: 0 bullish / 10 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
28d ago · $373.09
Evidence: 0 bullish / 10 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
31d ago · $373.40
Evidence: 1 bullish / 6 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
32d ago · $371.62
Evidence: -4.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
32d ago · $371.62
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
32d ago · $371.62
Evidence: 7 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 18, 2026
Then
66
$372.95
Now
68
$375.72
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
47
Value
33
Momentum
78
Risk
62
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
69
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING ADI...
Recent media coverage of Analog Devices (ADI) highlights its strong performance in AI-driven sectors, particularly data centers and industrial applications, which are driving growth and profitability. Analysts note its solid dividend growth—with a 1.88% yield and 10% annual increase—despite a premium stock valuation. While competition remains intense, ADI’s focus on high-margin solutions and surging semiconductor demand (linked to AI) has kept it in focus among chip stocks. Comparisons to peers and discussions on valuation trends also feature prominently.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Analog Devices. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
53
Fundamentals
69
Technical
78
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-14%
Market Narrative
84
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+47
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ADI’s psychology score (45) is dominated by **overconfidence**, where traders appear detached from valuation (222% above DCF) despite weak momentum. The **narrative gap** (74 vs. 37) suggests optimism far exceeds fundamentals, while **anchoring** (4.2% above support) hints at reluctance to accept declines. The absence of panic or herding implies confidence persists despite neutral volume and subdued volatility. The key question: *Will traders reassess fundamentals, or will overconfidence sustain despite valuation disconnect?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:45 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"ADI, TSM, TXN [...] could benefit as surging semiconductor sales and solid AI demand fuel optimism"
"ADI passes dividend screen with solid profitability [...] backed by strong profitability"
"ADI Declines 5.6% in a Month: [...] despite intense competition and a premium valuation"
"Analog Devices has outperformed the Nasdaq over the past year"
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 18/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between the most bullish and bearish methodologies, reflecting starkly different investment philosophies. The highest scores—from Edgar Lawrence Smith (80), Walter Bagehot (75), and Morgan Housel (75)—paint a picture of a resilient, long-term hold with strong fundamentals and defensive traits, ideal for patient, principle-driven investors. Meanwhile, the lower end, particularly Benjamin Graham (27) and Jesse Livermore (22), dismisses it outright, with Graham’s strict valuation rules and Livermore’s trend-following discipline flagging it as either overpriced or in a downtrend. Even moderate scorers like Fisher (67) and Marks (47) acknowledge its strengths but temper enthusiasm, noting either missed exceptional quality or already-high expectations. The contrast underscores how some frameworks prioritize stability and compounding (like Smith or Housel), while others demand structural edge (Graham) or market timing (Livermore) before committing.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 80
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 75
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 73
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 69
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 67
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 49
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 48
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 27
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 27
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 18
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
61.5%
Operating Margin
26.6%
Net Margin
20.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
6.7%
ROA
4.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.59
Cash
$2.50B
Total Debt
$8.15B
Current Ratio
2.19
Debt/Equity
0.25
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.9.2026 | $1.100 |
| 2.6.2026 | $1.100 |
| 1.6.2026 | $1.100 |
| 3.3.2026 | $1.100 |
| 2.3.2026 | $1.100 |
| 8.12.2025 | $0.990 |
| 7.12.2025 | $0.990 |
| 2.9.2025 | $0.990 |
| 1.9.2025 | $0.990 |
| 4.6.2025 | $0.990 |
| 3.6.2025 | $0.990 |
| 4.3.2025 | $0.990 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$375.72
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$112.80
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-70.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-1.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1.4% | $4.22B | $3.87B |
| 2 | -0.4% | $4.20B | $3.54B |
| 3 | 0.6% | $4.23B | $3.26B |
| 4 | 1.5% | $4.29B | $3.04B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $4.40B | $2.86B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$4.28B
Terminal Value
$69.39B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$45.10B
Enterprise Value
$61.67B
Net Debt
$5.65B
Equity Value
$56.03B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$69.06
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$52.69
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 4 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Analog Devices (ADI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 68/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ADI currently scores 68/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ADI's estimated fair value is $112.80, which is 70.0% below the current price of $375.72. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ADI's technical score is 78/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 39.0%; Free cash flow growth: 37.0%; Net income growth: 38.7%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $112.80 vs. price $375.72 (-70.0%); Operating margin is eroding over time; -15.5% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — ADI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 17 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STATA RAY | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 72 | -72 | $365.97 |
| STATA RAY | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 356 | -356 | $364.90 |
| STATA RAY | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 461 | -461 | $363.90 |
| STATA RAY | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 369 | -369 | $362.94 |
| STATA RAY | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 158 | -158 | $361.93 |
| STATA RAY | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 222 | -222 | $363.38 |
| STATA RAY | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 462 | -462 | $362.20 |
| STATA RAY | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 12 | -12 | $366.05 |
| STATA RAY | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 364 | -364 | $361.26 |
| STATA RAY | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 156 | -156 | $365.51 |
| STATA RAY | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 200 | -200 | $364.37 |
| Puccio Richard C Jr | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $363.65 |
| ROCHE VINCENT | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $108.08 |
| ROCHE VINCENT | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $356.33 |
| ROCHE VINCENT | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.9.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $108.08 |
| Golz Karen | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 10,019 | -1,000 | $374.50 |
| Golz Karen | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $374.50 |
| Puccio Richard C Jr | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 54,177 | -2,683 | $374.56 |
| Puccio Richard C Jr | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 2,683 | -2,683 | $374.56 |
| Cotter Martin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 704.945 | -704.945 | $390.28 |
| Jain Vivek | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 1,111.067 | -1,111.067 | $390.28 |
| Nakamura Katsufumi | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 201.619 | -201.619 | $390.28 |
| Puccio Richard C Jr | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 1,108.183 | -1,108.183 | $390.28 |
| ROCHE VINCENT | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 2,877.792 | -2,877.792 | $390.28 |
| Sondel Michael | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.8.2026 | 237.398 | -237.398 | $390.28 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
8,750,314 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 9,768,175 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology