Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$64.57
▲ $0.51 (+0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/19 12:29 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$656.67M
Day Range
$63.09 - $65.74
52-Week Range
$42.52 - $67.60
Beta
—
Next Earnings
21.10.2026
Support
$58.55
Resistance
$67.60
+40.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/25 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $97.73 vs. price $64.57 (+51.3%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -3.5%
Growth
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
64
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
65
Quality
50
Value
62
Momentum
67
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
51
Institutional
33
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of ACNB Corporation has primarily focused on its strong performance as a **dividend stock**, highlighting its consistent cash dividend payments and shareholder-friendly payouts. Analysts praise its **financial stability, robust balance sheet, and prudent asset management**, often positioning it as a "Buy" due to superior returns on assets and operational strength. Comparisons to sector peers occasionally appear, though the emphasis remains on ACNB’s dividend reliability and financial health. No major controversies or negative developments are noted in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about ACNB Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
39
Psychology
26
Fundamentals
51
Technical
67
Valuation
62
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+13%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
39
Narrative Gap
+14
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant **herding** behavior reflects relative underperformance against peers, while **FOMO** and **euphoria** persist due to strong momentum, sentiment, and valuation disconnects. Traders appear to be chasing gains despite the stock trading well below intrinsic value, a classic tension between technical momentum and fundamental mispricing. The **narrative gap** (54 vs. 39) hints at a disconnect where optimism outweighs reality, but the key question remains: *Will herd behavior sustain, or will traders pivot when valuation gaps widen?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:46 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Dividends are one of the best benefits to being a shareholder, but finding a great dividend stock is no easy task. Does ACNB (ACNB) have what it takes?"
"ACNB Corporation is rated a Buy due to its strong balance sheet growth, robust asset quality, and prudent deposit management."
"ACNB Corporation (ACNB) Hit a 52 Week High, Can the Run Continue?"
"Are Options Traders Betting on a Big Move in ACNB Stock?"
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Philip Fisher — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides historical methodologies sharply, with some legendary investors seeing exceptional potential while others warn of overvaluation or late-cycle risks. Philip Fisher and Edgar Lawrence Smith both rate ACNB as a high-quality, long-term hold—Fisher’s near-perfect score reflects his focus on durable competitive advantages, while Smith’s 'buy-and-hold' verdict aligns with his emphasis on secular growth. Conversely, Benjamin Graham’s mixed verdict and his Enterprising Investor variant’s low score suggest the stock doesn’t meet his margin-of-safety thresholds, especially for risk-averse investors. Meanwhile, market-cycle observers like Howard Marks and Samuel Armstrong Nelson flag potential overbought conditions or late-stage risks, while behavioral economists like Mackay and Veblen warn of crowd-driven excitement or speculative growth chasing. The divide underscores whether ACNB’s fundamentals justify its valuation or if it’s already priced for perfection.
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 92
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 83
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 69
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 66
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 64
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 61
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 57
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 51
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 43
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 42
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 35
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 26
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 22
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
19.3%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
8.8%
ROA
1.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.61
Cash
$65.65M
Total Debt
$320.12M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.76
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.9.2026 | $0.420 |
| 1.6.2026 | $0.920 |
| 31.5.2026 | $0.920 |
| 27.2.2026 | $0.380 |
| 26.2.2026 | $0.380 |
| 1.12.2025 | $0.380 |
| 30.11.2025 | $0.380 |
| 29.8.2025 | $0.340 |
| 28.8.2025 | $0.340 |
| 30.5.2025 | $0.340 |
| 29.5.2025 | $0.340 |
| 28.2.2025 | $0.320 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$64.57
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$97.73
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+51.3%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
21.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.9% | $64.08M | $58.79M |
| 2 | 17.0% | $75.00M | $63.13M |
| 3 | 12.2% | $84.15M | $64.98M |
| 4 | 7.3% | $90.34M | $64.00M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $92.60M | $60.18M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$52.57M
Terminal Value
$1.46B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$949.00M
Enterprise Value
$1.26B
Net Debt
$254.47M
Equity Value
$1.01B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$40.81
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$32.37
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 9 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 26.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.8.2026
Zacks · 13.8.2026
Zacks · 12.8.2026
Yahoo · 12.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 29.7.2026
Zacks · 28.7.2026
Zacks · 28.7.2026
Zacks · 28.7.2026
Zacks · 27.7.2026
Zacks · 23.7.2026
Associated Press · 23.7.2026
ACNB Corporation (ACNB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 64/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ACNB currently scores 64/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ACNB's estimated fair value is $97.73, which is 51.3% above the current price of $64.57. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ACNB's technical score is 67/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $97.73 vs. price $64.57 (+51.3%); Revenue growth (last year): 45.1%; Free cash flow growth: 35.4%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -3.5%; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — ACNB has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 1 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polli John M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.9.2026 | 210.599 | +210.599 | $65.29 |
| Draganosky Eugene J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.9.2026 | 157.758 | +157.758 | $65.29 |
| ELSNER FRANK III | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.9.2026 | 157.758 | +157.758 | $65.29 |
| Carson Elizabeth F. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.9.2026 | 157.758 | +157.758 | $65.29 |
| Newell Donna M | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.9.2026 | 210.599 | +210.599 | $65.29 |
| ELSNER FRANK III | Open Market Purchase | 15.9.2026 | 3.829 | +3.829 | $65.29 |
| Seibel Donald Arthur Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.9.2026 | 210.599 | +210.599 | $65.29 |
| Stock Alan J | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.9.2026 | 210.599 | +210.599 | $65.29 |
| Lott James J | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.9.2026 | 157.758 | +157.758 | $65.29 |
| Chaney Kimberly S | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.9.2026 | 157.758 | +157.758 | $65.29 |
| Herring Todd L | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.9.2026 | 210.599 | +210.599 | $65.29 |
| Chiaruttini Alexandra C | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.9.2026 | 210.599 | +210.599 | $65.29 |
| Seibel Donald Arthur Jr | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $64.35 |
| Seibel Donald Arthur Jr | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 5,312 | -1,500 | $64.35 |
| Stock Alan J | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 243.32 | +243.32 | $56.51 |
| ELSNER FRANK III | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 4.424 | +4.424 | $56.51 |
| Draganosky Eugene J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 182.269 | +182.269 | $56.51 |
| Seibel Donald Arthur Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 243.32 | +243.32 | $56.51 |
| Newell Donna M | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 243.32 | +243.32 | $56.51 |
| Chiaruttini Alexandra C | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 243.32 | +243.32 | $56.51 |
| ELSNER FRANK III | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 182.269 | +182.269 | $56.51 |
| Lott James J | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 182.269 | +182.269 | $56.51 |
| Chaney Kimberly S | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 182.269 | +182.269 | $56.51 |
| Polli John M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 243.32 | +243.32 | $56.51 |
| Herring Todd L | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 243.32 | +243.32 | $56.51 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
409,589 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 298,559 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
71.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 61.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology