Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$11.99
▲ $0.03 (+0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 09:28 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$930.46M
Day Range
$11.85 - $12.05
52-Week Range
$8.91 - $15.96
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$11.28
Resistance
$14.95
AEBI is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-5.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 40.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$10.66 vs. price $11.99 (-188.9%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
41
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
42
Value
33
Momentum
22
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
42
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Aebi Schmidt Holding AG has focused on its strong financial performance and strategic growth initiatives. The company’s Q2 2026 results highlighted significant gains in sales, backlog, EBITDA (up 22%), and net income, driven by merger synergies, particularly from its acquisition of Shyft. Aebi Schmidt aims for CHF 3 billion in revenue and 13% margins while expanding its specialty-vehicle footprint. Analysts upgraded the stock rating to "Buy," raising price targets, and the company maintained full-year guidance amid positive operational momentum.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Aebi Schmidt Holding AG. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
19
Fundamentals
42
Technical
22
Valuation
33
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
64
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+28
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests **herding** dominates, with traders aligning after AEBI underperformed its peers today. FOMO and euphoria coexist due to momentum and perfect sentiment, but the gap between narrative (69) and reality (36) hints at potential disconnects. Overconfidence may arise from decoupling price gains from EPS growth. The key question: *Is the underperformance temporary, or does it signal deeper narrative misalignment?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:50 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Q2 results show higher sales, backlog, EBITDA, and net income as merger synergies strengthen"
"Aebi Schmidt outlined plans to expand revenue, margins and its specialty-vehicle footprint through a combination of organic growth, operational improvements and acquisitions"
"DA Davidson maintains Aebi Schmidt Holding with a Buy and raises the price target from $15 to $17"
"Shyft synergies build as part of revenue and margin expansion strategy"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on their documented principles, the model estimates that Nelson, Mackay, and Smith—all scoring in the 70s and 80s—view the stock favorably, emphasizing a supportive cycle position, lack of crowd mania, and long‑term hold potential. In contrast, Graham’s two approaches and Marks register middling scores around 49, reflecting only modest discounts or mixed business quality without a clear bargain. Lower‑scoring methodologies such as Lynch, Fisher, Loeb, and especially Livermore and Veblen (scores under 40) highlight concerns about growth quality, risk, volatility, and a negative trend that run counter to their growth‑or‑trend‑focused criteria. The spread of scores therefore mirrors the divergent lenses—cycle timing, deep value, growth quality, and market‑trend analysis—each historical investor applied to the same data.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 87
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 72
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 60
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 49
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 49
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 40
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 37
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 15
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 13
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
19.9%
Operating Margin
4.8%
Net Margin
0.6%
EBITDA Margin
7.7%
ROE
1.2%
ROA
0.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.17
Cash
$98.51M
Total Debt
$594.96M
Current Ratio
1.90
Debt/Equity
0.73
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 20.8.2026 | $0.025 |
| 5.6.2026 | $0.025 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.025 |
| 19.2.2026 | $0.025 |
| 18.2.2026 | $0.025 |
| 17.11.2025 | $0.025 |
| 16.11.2025 | $0.025 |
| 29.8.2025 | $0.025 |
| 28.8.2025 | $0.025 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$11.99
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$10.66
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-188.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
23.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.8% | $-6.48M | $-5.94M |
| 2 | 18.4% | $-7.67M | $-6.46M |
| 3 | 13.1% | $-8.68M | $-6.70M |
| 4 | 7.8% | $-9.36M | $-6.63M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-9.59M | $-6.23M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-5.23M
Terminal Value
$-151.21M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-98.28M
Enterprise Value
$-130.24M
Net Debt
$496.45M
Equity Value
$-626.68M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$13.86
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.31
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 30.8.2026
MarketBeat · 30.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.8.2026
Motley Fool · 20.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
Moby · 13.8.2026
MarketBeat · 13.8.2026
InvestorsHub · 13.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.8.2026
Zacks · 13.8.2026
MT Newswires · 13.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 13.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 6.8.2026
Aebi Schmidt Holding AG (AEBI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 41/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AEBI currently scores 41/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AEBI's estimated fair value is -$10.66, which is 188.9% below the current price of $11.99. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AEBI's technical score is 22/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 40.6%; Current ratio: 1.90; Current ratio: 1.90.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$10.66 vs. price $11.99 (-188.9%); Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 4.7% of price.
Yes — AEBI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farmer Jacob Owen | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 2,225 | -2,225 | $12.89 |
| Farmer Jacob Owen | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.7.2026 | 262,580 | -2,225 | $12.89 |
| Schenkirsch Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 7,844 | +7,844 | $12.51 |
| Schaub Patrick Francois | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 8,334 | +8,334 | $12.51 |
| Spuhler-Hoffmann Daniela | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 7,412 | +7,412 | $12.51 |
| Ritter Martin | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 7,412 | +7,412 | $12.51 |
| Rickenbacher Andreas Frederic | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 8,134 | +8,134 | $12.51 |
| PIZZUTO TERRI | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 7,533 | +7,533 | $12.51 |
| Portmann Marco | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 10,459 | +10,459 | $12.51 |
| DINKINS MICHAEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 7,533 | +7,533 | $12.51 |
| Kaltenbach Stefan | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 4,184 | +4,184 | $12.51 |
| Schroeder Henning | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 7,844 | +7,844 | $12.51 |
| Farmer Jacob Owen | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 24,550 | +24,550 | $12.51 |
| Scherer Marcus Andreas | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 3,274 | +3,274 | $12.51 |
| Freeman Angela K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 7,533 | +7,533 | $12.51 |
| Schewerda Steffen | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 20,459 | +20,459 | $12.51 |
| DINKINS MICHAEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 49,388 | +7,533 | $12.51 |
| PIZZUTO TERRI | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 49,961 | +7,533 | $12.51 |
| Freeman Angela K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 57,923 | +7,533 | $12.51 |
| Farmer Jacob Owen | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 264,805 | +24,550 | $12.51 |
| Fruithof Barend Gerrit | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,887,660 | +52,292 | $12.51 |
| Fruithof Barend Gerrit | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,895,673 | +8,013 | $12.51 |
| Schenkirsch Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 112,374 | +7,844 | $12.51 |
| Spuhler-Hoffmann Daniela | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 29,912 | +7,412 | $12.51 |
| Schaub Patrick Francois | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 58,297 | +8,334 | $12.51 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,561,241 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,672,236 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
63.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 73.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology