Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$1.43
▲ $0.12 (+9.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:20 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$1.31 - $1.43
52-Week Range
$0.50 - $3.22
Beta
—
Next Earnings
01.02.2027
Support
$0.50
Resistance
$1.56
YSXT is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-54.9% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 9/14 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 8.1% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
YSXT demonstrates a robust technical and news-driven profile, supported by a strong upward momentum and favorable sector activity. The stock sits comfortably above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, reinforcing a sustained bullish trend, while the positive MACD histogram and 52.0% gain over the past three months relative to its benchmark index highlight accelerating upward momentum. However, the ADX of 58.5 indicates a strong trend, though the RSI at 83.4 and %K at 100.0 signal potential overbought conditions, which may warrant caution. The news category is bolstered by consistent positive movement in consumer discretionary stocks across multiple after-market and pre-market sessions, suggesting broader sectoral tailwinds. Conversely, the risk category is heavily weighted down by high volatility (ATR of 7.4%) and a historically volatile performance (Keltner Channel showing a 91.2% maximum drawdown over three years), which underscores significant downside risk if the trend reverses. The overall investor score of 79 and 'STRONG' rating reflect a balanced view where technical and news strengths are partially offset by elevated risk factors.
The stock price remains above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and a 52.0% gain over the past three months, indicating strong upward momentum. However, the RSI (83.4) and %K (100.0) suggest overbought conditions, which may signal potential short-term exhaustion.
Technical strength validates the bullish trend, but overbought signals could trigger a pullback or consolidation, impacting near-term momentum.
The stock is part of a consistently positive after-market and pre-market trend within the consumer discretionary sector, with multiple sessions showing movement in related stocks.
Sectoral momentum suggests external tailwinds, reinforcing the stock’s relative strength and potential for continued upward movement.
The ATR (7.4%) indicates high volatility, and the Keltner Channel shows a severe historical drawdown of 91.2% over three years, signaling significant downside risk.
High volatility and extreme historical drawdowns imply that while upside potential exists, the stock carries substantial risk of sharp declines if market conditions deteriorate.
StockIQ conclusion
YSXT exhibits a compelling technical and news-driven profile, supported by strong upward momentum and sectoral tailwinds. However, elevated volatility and historical drawdown risks temper the outlook, particularly for investors sensitive to downside exposure. The stock’s overbought conditions may prompt a near-term pullback, but sustained sectoral strength could continue driving the trend. The overall 'STRONG' rating reflects a nuanced balance between bullish indicators and significant risk factors, requiring careful monitoring of volatility and macroeconomic conditions.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
78
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $1.43
Evidence: +9.3pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $1.43
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $1.43
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $1.25
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $1.25
Evidence: 10 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
5d ago · $1.25
Evidence: -3.1pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $1.28
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $1.28
Evidence: 10 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $1.28
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $1.28
Evidence: 10 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $1.30
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
9d ago · $1.30
Evidence: 10 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
10d ago · $1.30
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
10d ago · $1.30
Evidence: 10 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
11d ago · $1.29
Evidence: -16.8pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
11d ago · $1.29
Evidence: -5.1pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
11d ago · $1.33
Evidence: -14.6pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
11d ago · $1.33
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
11d ago · $1.33
Evidence: 11 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
17d ago · $1.22
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 55)
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 1, 2026
Then
81
$1.19
Now
78
$1.43
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
81
Risk
34
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
🕵️ What the Detective found on YSXT
Detective Score 80/100 · 3 signals convergingOverall, the signals found here lean positive.
🧠 What the Detective thinks
3 signals are currently converging on YSXT at once — see each one broken down below, in plain language, with its own positive/negative read.
What this means now: Several different technical indicators are currently agreeing on the same direction at once — that's unusual; most days they contradict each other.
Why it matters: When several technical indicators agree at once, that's usually more reliable than any single indicator alone.
What this means now: The price has formed a distinct technical structure (a trading range, shakeout, or breakout) that the Wyckoff method treats as a key moment where big money is building or unwinding a position.
Why it matters: May provide an additional indication of trading structure, but is not proof of future direction.
What this means now: The stock moved a lot more (or less) today than the average of other stocks in its sector — it stands out relative to its peers.
Why it matters: A move that meaningfully outpaces its sector suggests something company-specific, not just a sector-wide trend.
📊 Historically, this signal type
This is not a prediction and not investment advice — just a plain-language read of real, already-computed signals. Full details: Stock Detective →
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **YSX Tech Co., Ltd.** (NASDAQ: YSXT) is limited but highlights its stock performance, showing notable after-market gains—including a **10% increase to $1.10 per share** in August 2026—while its market capitalization remains around **$31.2 million**. No substantive details about operations, earnings, or strategic developments are available beyond these brief price movements.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about YSX Tech. Co., Ltd. News trend score: 92. Reason: 7 of the last 8 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
50
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
56
Fundamentals
—
Technical
81
Valuation
—
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+14%
Market Narrative
81
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+31
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant **euphoric** mindset, where strong momentum, extreme overperformance, and overwhelmingly positive sentiment align to create a speculative bubble. The **FOMO** score further confirms crowd participation, as traders chase gains driven by technical strength and hype. However, the **narrative gap** (84 vs. 50) hints at a disconnect between market euphoria and fundamental reality, raising caution. The key question: *Will external validation (e.g., fundamentals, macro shifts) sustain this momentum, or will it trigger a reversion?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:56 PM
What could change this?
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 19D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 81/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Livermore's documented principles, the model estimates a positive trend for YSXT, while Nelson’s mid‑cycle view yields only a modest score, reflecting a neutral stance. Graham, Fisher, Lynch and several others sit at the neutral 50 mark because their frameworks require balance‑sheet, growth or dividend data that is missing, leading to inconclusive readings. Marks and his cycle variant flag the stock as late‑cycle and risky, resulting in lower scores, and Loeb and Smith see heightened risk or insufficient dividend/growth evidence, pulling their scores further down. The efficient‑market view of Malkiel & Bogle and Schwager also find no clear edge, aligning with the more cautious assessments. Overall, the divergence stems from whether each methodology can apply its core criteria to the available information.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 81
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 51
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 32
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 28
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 26
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 14
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 289 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 8 articles.
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 19.8.2026
Benzinga · 18.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
Benzinga · 31.7.2026
Benzinga · 28.7.2026
Benzinga · 27.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.7.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for YSX Tech. Co., Ltd (YSXT) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for YSXT specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
YSXT's technical score is 81/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 8.1% of price; Calmar: -0.51 (3y annualized return -46.8% / max drawdown 91.2%); Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for YSXT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
63,529 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 44,230 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
43.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 41.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology