Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Communication Services · ·
$48.04
▼ $0.29 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/18 04:59 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$199.60B
Day Range
$47.20 - $48.19
52-Week Range
$38.39 - $51.68
Beta
—
Next Earnings
20.10.2026
VZ is a stock from the Communication Services sector — Telecom, media, and internet/social platforms — revenue from advertising and subscriptions.
+13.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.18
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
3d ago · $51.29
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 15 to 40 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
47
Value
55
Momentum
63
Risk
48
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
57
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING VZ...
Recent media coverage of Verizon has primarily centered on its **multi-billion-dollar, long-term supply agreement with Corning**, announced on September 8, 2026, covering optical fiber and connectivity solutions through 2032. The deal has driven Corning’s stock surge and positioned Verizon’s network expansion as critical for AI infrastructure and broadband capacity. Additionally, Verizon was briefly mentioned in an antitrust lawsuit filed by VoIP-Pal against major carriers, though the focus remained on the Corning partnership and its broader implications for Verizon’s tech investments.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Verizon. News trend score: 80. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 6 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
15
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
23
Fundamentals
57
Technical
63
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+10%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+18
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixated on the 1.5% gap below resistance, likely treating it as a near-term psychological barrier. Mild FOMO and euphoria coexist but lack extreme momentum or volume, indicating cautious optimism rather than reckless speculation. The narrative gap (59 vs. 37) hints at a disconnect where market expectations may outpace tangible fundamentals, particularly given overconfidence in price vs. EPS growth. The key question: will traders break the resistance anchor, or will the stock consolidate near this level?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:08 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Corning and Verizon agree on a supply agreement that runs through 2032 for broadband and AI infrastructure."
"shares of glass and electronic component manufacturer Corning jumped after the company announced a multi-year, multi-billion-dollar supply agreement with Verizon"
"Verizon Edged Lower as 80 Million Fiber Miles Chase AI Traffic"
"Verizon’s Megadeal Proves Corning Is Integral to the AI Grid"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 82/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 23/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for Verizon (VZ) reflects deep contrasts in methodological priorities. Morgan Housel’s near-perfect score highlights his focus on patient, long-term compounding—where steady, unexciting growth aligns with his principles—while Peter Lynch and Philip Fisher’s low scores reveal their insistence on explosive growth or transformative quality, which VZ lacks. Meanwhile, the mixed verdicts from Benjamin Graham and Howard Marks suggest the stock sits in a gray area: it may have defensible fundamentals (passing Graham’s stricter tests) but risks overvaluation or cyclical exposure (per Marks’ market-cycle lens). The lowest scores from Bagehot, Schwager, and the Efficient Market camp underscore concerns about liquidity risks, technical setups, or the futility of active stock-picking here, contrasting sharply with the more optimistic (though still cautious) views of Smith or Loeb, who tolerate moderate risk for steady returns.
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 82
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 67
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 66
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 64
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 62
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 42
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 42
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 39
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 26
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 25
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 23
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 23
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (5 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
21.2%
Net Margin
12.4%
EBITDA Margin
34.5%
ROE
16.2%
ROA
4.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.06
Cash
$19.05B
Total Debt
$18.62B
Current Ratio
0.91
Debt/Equity
0.18
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.7.2026 | $0.708 |
| 9.7.2026 | $0.708 |
| 10.4.2026 | $0.708 |
| 9.4.2026 | $0.708 |
| 12.1.2026 | $0.690 |
| 11.1.2026 | $0.690 |
| 10.10.2025 | $0.690 |
| 9.10.2025 | $0.690 |
| 10.7.2025 | $0.678 |
| 9.7.2025 | $0.678 |
| 10.4.2025 | $0.678 |
| 9.4.2025 | $0.678 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$24.99
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$17.12
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 3 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Verizon (VZ) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
VZ currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
VZ's technical score is 63/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.18; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Current ratio: 0.91; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -1.9%.
Yes — VZ has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malady Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 121.911 | +121.911 | $14.26 |
| Russo Joseph J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 77.408 | +77.408 | $14.26 |
| Stillwell Mary-Lee | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 40.997 | +40.997 | $14.26 |
| Skiadas Anthony T | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 121.911 | +121.911 | $14.26 |
| Villanueva Rodriguez Alfonso | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 252.992 | +252.992 | $14.26 |
| SCHULMAN DANIEL H | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 186.642 | +186.642 | $14.26 |
| Venkatesh Vandana | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.9.2026 | 89.545 | +89.545 | $14.26 |
| Malady Kyle | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 1,100 | -1,100 | $49.98 |
| Malady Kyle | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 1,100 | -1,100 | $50.50 |
| Stillwell Mary-Lee | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 17,103 | +41 | $14.11 |
| Russo Joseph J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 84,874 | +78 | $14.11 |
| Malady Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 424,262 | +123 | $14.11 |
| Skiadas Anthony T | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 146,990 | +123 | $14.11 |
| SCHULMAN DANIEL H | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 9,222 | +189 | $14.11 |
| Venkatesh Vandana | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 57,930 | +91 | $14.11 |
| Villanueva Rodriguez Alfonso | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 7,086 | +123 | $14.11 |
| Stillwell Mary-Lee | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 41.442 | +41.442 | $14.11 |
| SCHULMAN DANIEL H | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 188.671 | +188.671 | $14.11 |
| Venkatesh Vandana | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 90.518 | +90.518 | $14.11 |
| Skiadas Anthony T | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 123.236 | +123.236 | $14.11 |
| Russo Joseph J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 78.249 | +78.249 | $14.11 |
| Malady Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 123.236 | +123.236 | $14.11 |
| Villanueva Rodriguez Alfonso | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 123.236 | +123.236 | $14.11 |
| Malady Kyle | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 1,100 | -1,100 | $50.06 |
| Malady Kyle | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 108,766 | -1,100 | $50.06 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
82,444,862 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 83,388,266 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 37.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology