Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$4.94
▼ $0.16 (-3.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 02:26 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$3.55B
Day Range
$4.89 - $5.06
52-Week Range
$3.03 - $5.18
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$4.18
Resistance
$5.18
GGB is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+58.8% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 7/12 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.12 (3y annualized return 5.6% / max drawdown 45.9%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Gerdau S.A. (GGB) exhibits a balanced yet nuanced profile, with its **investorScore of 76** and **STRONG rating** driven primarily by robust technical indicators and mixed but predominantly positive news sentiment. The **technical category (83)** stands out due to clear bullish momentum—price holding above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 64.2 indicating healthy upward momentum. However, the **overbought %K (94.6)** suggests potential short-term consolidation. News sentiment (74) reflects a split: positive signals from sector tailwinds (e.g., coal/energy price gains) and institutional support (JP Morgan’s overweight rating) are offset by earnings misses (Ferroglobe’s Q4 EPS shortfall) and neutral dividend-focused narratives. The **risk category (42)** is the weakest, highlighting volatility concerns: a **47.6% historical drawdown** and a **0.12 Kalmar ratio** underscore significant downside risk, while the ATR (3.4% of price) confirms moderate volatility. Together, these factors create a stock with strong technical support but elevated risk exposure and mixed fundamental signals.
Price exceeds both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, MACD histogram is positive, and RSI (64.2) reflects healthy upward momentum, though %K (94.6) indicates overbought conditions.
This suggests near-term bullish momentum but also signals potential overvaluation or imminent pullback.
Positive institutional backing (JP Morgan) and sector tailwinds (coal/energy gains) contrast with earnings misses (Ferroglobe) and neutral dividend narratives.
The mixed news creates uncertainty, balancing growth optimism with execution risks.
High historical drawdown (47.6%) and a low Kalmar ratio (0.12) indicate significant volatility and downside risk, while ATR (3.4%) confirms moderate price swings.
These metrics highlight the stock’s susceptibility to sharp corrections, even amid bullish technicals.
StockIQ conclusion
Gerdau (GGB) presents a stock with **strong technical foundations** but **elevated risk exposure**, reflected in its balanced investor score. While price action and momentum support a bullish outlook, concerns over volatility, overbought conditions, and mixed news sentiment create caution. The risk category remains the weakest link, emphasizing the need for vigilance. Investors should monitor earnings execution and sector trends, as these could meaningfully shift the stock’s trajectory.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
73
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
2d ago · $4.97
Evidence: -3.6pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $5.10
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $5.10
Evidence: 8 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $4.99
Evidence: -3.2pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $4.99
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
3d ago · $4.99
Evidence: 8 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 10, 2026
Then
76
$5.01
Now
73
$4.94
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
77
Risk
42
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
10
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Gerdau S.A. has primarily centered on its stock performance and dividend potential. Analysts like JP Morgan have maintained an optimistic outlook, raising the price target to $6.5, while others, including Bank of America, downgraded the stock to Neutral. The company has been highlighted as a strong dividend stock, with multiple sources praising its dividends as a key benefit for shareholders. Additionally, Gerdau’s shares were briefly impacted by broader market shifts tied to energy commodities amid geopolitical tensions. Earnings discussions and quarterly updates also contributed to the focus on its financial health.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Gerdau S.A.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
22
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
47
Fundamentals
—
Technical
77
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+18%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests a mix of FOMO and anchoring, with traders chasing momentum (+16.9% ROC) while eyeing resistance. Herding is active due to relative underperformance, but euphoria remains muted despite positive sentiment (74/100). The key question: will traders anchor near resistance or break out, or will momentum stall? The narrative-reality gap (23) hints at optimism outpacing fundamentals, raising caution.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:52 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Why Gerdau (GGB) is a Great Dividend Stock Right Now"
"JP Morgan analyst Rodolfo Angele maintains Gerdau with Overweight and raises price target to $6.5"
"Gerdau Shares Lower After BofA Downgrade"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 57/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 10/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological contrasts. Jesse Livermore’s high score (74) and positive trend verdict suggest he’d see it as a momentum play, aligning with his focus on price action and upward momentum. Meanwhile, the majority of methodologies—including Graham, Fisher, and Lynch—returned neutral scores (50) due to insufficient fundamental or valuation data, indicating they lack the concrete signals needed to form a decisive opinion. On the cautious side, investors like Gerald Loeb (36) and Samuel Nelson (10) flag red flags, with Nelson warning of overbought conditions and Loeb highlighting excessive risk, while Howard Marks’ mixed verdict (47) hints at a business with potential but already priced for optimism. The extreme lows from Veblen (20) and Housel (16) imply concerns about speculative behavior or volatility that could deter patient, long-term holders.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 57
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 56
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 40
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 34
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 10
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 21.8.2026 | $0.045 |
| 15.5.2026 | $0.036 |
| 14.5.2026 | $0.036 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.019 |
| 11.3.2026 | $0.019 |
| 13.8.2025 | $0.022 |
| 12.8.2025 | $0.022 |
| 12.5.2025 | $0.021 |
| 11.5.2025 | $0.021 |
| 7.3.2025 | $0.017 |
| 6.3.2025 | $0.017 |
| 21.11.2024 | $0.049 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 9 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 24.8.2026
Benzinga · 24.8.2026
Benzinga · 24.8.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
MarketBeat · 8.8.2026
Zacks · 7.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
Associated Press · 4.8.2026
PR Newswire · 4.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Gerdau S.A. (GGB) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for GGB specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
GGB's technical score is 77/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.12 (3y annualized return 5.6% / max drawdown 45.9%); Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — GGB has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 19 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johannpeter Andre Bier Gerdau | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 247,380 | -99,200 | $4.94 |
| Johannpeter Andre Bier Gerdau | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 99,200 | -99,200 | $4.94 |
| Japur Rafael Dorneles | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 86,967 | -10,000 | $5.10 |
| Japur Rafael Dorneles | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $5.10 |
| Wahrhaftig Marcos Eduardo Faraco | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 107,749 | +107,749 | $3.75 |
| Wahrhaftig Marcos Eduardo Faraco | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.7.2026 | 107,749 | +107,749 | $3.75 |
| Da Cunha Gustavo Werneck | Open Market Purchase | 12.6.2026 | 165,224 | +165,224 | $4.73 |
| Da Cunha Gustavo Werneck | Open Market Purchase | 12.6.2026 | 165,224 | +165,224 | $4.73 |
| Mattiello Marcos Zilles | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 0 | -10,387 | $5.11 |
| Mattiello Marcos Zilles | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 10,387.111 | -10,387.111 | $5.11 |
| Metz Mauricio | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 7,000 | -7,000 | $4.85 |
| Wang Chia Yuan | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 30,935 | -30,935 | $4.49 |
| Wang Chia Yuan | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 0 | -30,935 | $4.49 |
| Metz Mauricio | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 22,536 | -7,000 | $4.85 |
| Metz Mauricio | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $4.70 |
| Metz Mauricio | Open Market Sale | 26.5.2026 | 29,536 | -5,000 | $4.70 |
| Japur Rafael Dorneles | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $4.75 |
| Japur Rafael Dorneles | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 96,967 | -5,000 | $4.75 |
| Peres Cesar Obino da Rosa | Open Market Sale | 19.5.2026 | 8,000 | -8,000 | $4.60 |
| Peres Cesar Obino da Rosa | Open Market Sale | 19.5.2026 | 8 | -8,000 | $4.60 |
| Metz Mauricio | Open Market Sale | 13.5.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $4.85 |
| Metz Mauricio | Open Market Sale | 13.5.2026 | 34,536 | -5,000 | $4.85 |
| Da Cunha Gustavo Werneck | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 432,774 | +432,774 | — |
| Da Cunha Gustavo Werneck | Open Market Sale | 8.5.2026 | 432,854 | -432,854 | $4.87 |
| Da Cunha Gustavo Werneck | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.5.2026 | 432,854 | +432,774 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
36,095,550 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 36,620,373 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology