Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Communication Services · ·
$25.40
▲ $0.01 (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 05:07 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$25.07 - $25.64
52-Week Range
$19.89 - $29.44
Beta
—
Next Earnings
20.10.2026
Support
$20.62
Resistance
$26.93
T is a stock from the Communication Services sector — Telecom, media, and internet/social platforms — revenue from advertising and subscriptions.
-13.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 104.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.91
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
7d ago · $26.06
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 5 to 32 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
58
Value
55
Momentum
57
Risk
42
Sentiment
38
Fundamental
57
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING T...
Recent media coverage regarding AT&T heavily focuses on its investment potential, dividend reliability, and stock performance. While some analysts highlight the company's dividend
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about AT&T. News trend score: 38. Reason: 5 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
11
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
13
Fundamentals
57
Technical
57
Valuation
55
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+15%
Market Narrative
37
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
-4
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here is dominated by **anchoring**, as traders appear fixated on the 2.9% resistance level, despite moderate FOMO and herding signals. The narrative-reality gap (15 points) hints at potential misalignment between perceived and actual value, but anchoring remains the most pronounced bias. The key question is whether traders will break resistance or retreat, given the lack of extreme momentum or volatility. Herding is muted, as the stock outperformed peers today, reducing group-think pressure. Overconfidence is minimal, suggesting no overreach in valuation relative to fundamentals.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:17 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Amazon and AT&T partner to challenge SpaceX Starlink dominance"
"AT&T Business Expands Connectivity Architecture With Amazon Leo Satellite"
"the stock everyone wrote off surging past both its rivals"
"Can AT&T's Latest Smartphone Offers Boost Customer Satisfaction?"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 17/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles, Veblen and Lynch assign the highest scores (77 and 76) and view the stock’s growth as aligned with real value creation, while Graham’s traditional and enterprising screens give middling to low scores (55 and 41), indicating mixed or insufficient safety margins. Mid‑range scores from Mackay, Fisher, Smith, Schwager and Marks reflect some optimism but also caution about crowd excitement, quality and pricing expectations. The lowest scores from Loeb, Bagehot and Nelson highlight concerns about risk, liquidity and a potentially overbought cycle. Overall, the divergence stems from each methodology weighting growth, value, market efficiency and risk differently, leading to a split view on the stock.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 92
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 79
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 77
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 76
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 56
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 49
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 43
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 38
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 33
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 33
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 32
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 17
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 5 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
19.2%
Net Margin
17.5%
EBITDA Margin
35.9%
ROE
17.4%
ROA
5.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.04
Cash
$18.23B
Total Debt
$143.73B
Current Ratio
0.91
Debt/Equity
1.14
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.7.2026 | $0.278 |
| 9.7.2026 | $0.278 |
| 10.4.2026 | $0.278 |
| 9.4.2026 | $0.278 |
| 12.1.2026 | $0.278 |
| 11.1.2026 | $0.278 |
| 10.10.2025 | $0.278 |
| 9.10.2025 | $0.278 |
| 10.7.2025 | $0.278 |
| 9.7.2025 | $0.278 |
| 10.4.2025 | $0.278 |
| 9.4.2025 | $0.278 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$17.62
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$8.78
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 12 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
MT Newswires · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
PR Newswire · 18.9.2026
CNW Group · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Trefis · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Trefis · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo Finance · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Stocktwits · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
AT&T (T) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
T currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
T's technical score is 57/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 104.0%; Net income growth: 100.5%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.91; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Current ratio: 0.91.
Yes — T has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabrina Sanders S | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 126.535 | +126.535 | $25.89 |
| Desroches Pascal | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 1,730.076 | +1,730.076 | $25.89 |
| McElfresh Jeffery S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 482.812 | +482.812 | $25.89 |
| Lee Lori M | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 347.625 | +347.625 | $25.89 |
| Desroches Pascal | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 3,487.472 | +3,487.472 | $23.25 |
| MAYER MARISSA A | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 543.326 | +543.326 | $23.25 |
| STANKEY JOHN T | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 927.915 | +927.915 | $23.25 |
| Sabrina Sanders S | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 167.806 | +167.806 | $23.25 |
| McElfresh Jeffery S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 2,690.053 | +2,690.053 | $23.25 |
| Lee Lori M | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 499.616 | +499.616 | $23.25 |
| LUCZO STEPHEN J | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 1,715.708 | +1,715.708 | $23.25 |
| MCCALLISTER MICHAEL B | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 1,973.592 | +1,973.592 | $23.25 |
| TAYLOR CINDY B | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 2,666.96 | +2,666.96 | $23.25 |
| Kennard William E | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 1,727.763 | +1,727.763 | $23.25 |
| MOONEY BETH E | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 2,340.15 | +2,340.15 | $23.25 |
| Ubinas Luis A | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 869.083 | +869.083 | $23.25 |
| ROSE MATTHEW K | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 4,238.297 | +4,238.297 | $23.25 |
| Grier Kelly J | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 178.044 | +178.044 | $23.25 |
| MCCALLISTER MICHAEL B | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 167,329 | +1,974 | $23.25 |
| Kennard William E | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 146,486 | +1,728 | $23.25 |
| TAYLOR CINDY B | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 226,115 | +2,667 | $23.25 |
| ROSE MATTHEW K | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 359,339 | +4,238 | $23.25 |
| MOONEY BETH E | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 198,407 | +2,340 | $23.25 |
| STANKEY JOHN T | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 78,672 | +928 | $23.25 |
| LUCZO STEPHEN J | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 145,464 | +1,716 | $23.25 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
125,256,838 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 130,021,999 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 49.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology