Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$292.30
▼ $1.01 (-0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/19 04:37 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$14.01B
Day Range
$288.59 - $298.32
52-Week Range
$279.77 - $451.28
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$279.77
Resistance
$414.79
TLN is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
-29.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 22.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $42.31 vs. price $292.30 (-85.5%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
38
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
16
Risk
44
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
22
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) highlights its recovery from bankruptcy, emphasizing its transformation into a high-yield investment. Analysts like Mizuho Securities have issued optimistic outlooks, projecting a rebound due to its strong position in the PJM power market, where demand is tightening. The company’s strategic growth and stability in the utility sector have drawn attention, despite a 23% decline in stock value this year.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Talen Energy Corporation. News trend score: 92. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
31
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
35
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
22
Technical
16
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
-33%
Market Narrative
73
Fundamental Reality
35
Narrative Gap
+38
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
TLN’s dominant **herding** behavior reflects a synchronized move with peers, suggesting traders are following broader sector momentum rather than independent analysis. The **overconfidence** score (52) hints at a disconnect between price appreciation (+3.9% ROC) and stagnant fundamentals (-1.3% EPS growth), while the **euphoria** signal (28) is muted by neutral RSI and modest volume. The **narrative gap** (36) implies traders may be overestimating growth potential relative to reality. The key question: *Will alignment with peers sustain, or will valuation extremes trigger divergence?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:24 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"The positive outlook by Mizuho’s Anthony Crowdell reflects the utility’s growing presence in the tightening PJM power markets."
"How Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) Transformed Bankruptcy into a High-Yield Masterclass"
"Mizuho with an ‘Outperform’ rating and a price target of $405, implying an upside of over 32%."
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with scores ranging from a near-total rejection by Benjamin Graham (4) to cautious optimism from Charles Mackay (66). Graham’s strict defensive criteria and Walter Bagehot’s liquidity concerns flag it as a high-risk bet, while Thorstein Veblen’s skepticism of unchecked growth and Gerald Loeb’s capital-preservation instincts further dampen enthusiasm. Meanwhile, Howard Marks (Market Cycle) and Philip Fisher see it as a mid-cycle or solid but non-exceptional opportunity, suggesting moderate potential without transformative upside. The contrast between Livermore’s bearish trend signal and Malkiel/Bogle’s lukewarm efficient-market verdict underscores whether the stock is a contrarian play or a speculative gamble—with only a handful of methodologies (like Mackay’s crowd-driven excitement) hinting at latent demand.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 89
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 69
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 57
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 33
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 27
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 25
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 22
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 16
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 4
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-3.5%
Net Margin
-8.5%
EBITDA Margin
7.3%
ROE
-20.0%
ROA
-2.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$4.79
Cash
$689.00M
Total Debt
$6.81B
Current Ratio
1.28
Debt/Equity
6.23
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$292.30
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$42.31
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-85.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-4.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -4.7% | $577.22M | $529.56M |
| 2 | -2.9% | $560.27M | $471.57M |
| 3 | -1.1% | $553.97M | $427.77M |
| 4 | 0.7% | $557.78M | $395.14M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $571.72M | $371.58M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$606.00M
Terminal Value
$9.02B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.86B
Enterprise Value
$8.06B
Net Debt
$6.12B
Equity Value
$1.93B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$23.92
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$23.92
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 3 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Barrons.com · 31.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Talen Energy Corporation (TLN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 38/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
TLN currently scores 38/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, TLN's estimated fair value is $42.31, which is 85.5% below the current price of $292.30. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
TLN's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 22.0%; Free cash flow growth: 254.4%; Calmar: 2.03 (3y annualized return 74.7% / max drawdown 36.7%).
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $42.31 vs. price $292.30 (-85.5%); Operating margin: -3.5% (negative); Net margin: -8.5% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for TLN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutt Terry L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 8,312 | +8,312 | — |
| Nutt Terry L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 20,780 | -20,780 | — |
| Nutt Terry L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.7.2026 | 3,271 | -3,271 | $385.80 |
| Nutt Terry L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 76,136 | +8,312 | — |
| Nutt Terry L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.7.2026 | 72,865 | -3,271 | $385.80 |
| Nutt Terry L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.7.2026 | 0 | -20,780 | — |
| ABBAS GIZMAN I | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 2,600 | -2,600 | $380.00 |
| ABBAS GIZMAN I | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 2,606 | -2,600 | $380.00 |
| McFarland Mark Allen | Other Transaction | 8.6.2026 | 260,335 | +260,335 | — |
| McFarland Mark Allen | Other Transaction | 8.6.2026 | 260,335 | -260,335 | — |
| McFarland Mark Allen | Other Transaction | 8.6.2026 | 117 | -260,335 | — |
| McFarland Mark Allen | Other Transaction | 8.6.2026 | 260,335 | +260,335 | — |
| Olagues Darren J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.5.2026 | 7,395 | +7,395 | — |
| SCHAEFER STEPHEN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.5.2026 | 18,349 | +18,349 | — |
| Nutt Terry L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.5.2026 | 90,826 | +90,826 | — |
| Olagues Darren J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.5.2026 | 18,487 | -18,487 | — |
| Nutt Terry L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.5.2026 | 227,064 | -227,064 | — |
| SCHAEFER STEPHEN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.5.2026 | 4,133 | -4,133 | — |
| ABBAS GIZMAN I | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.5.2026 | 4,133 | -4,133 | — |
| SCHAEFER STEPHEN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.5.2026 | 4,133 | +4,133 | — |
| SCHAEFER STEPHEN | Disposition to the Company | 22.5.2026 | 6,789 | -6,789 | $324.21 |
| Plagens Anthony J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.5.2026 | 8,502 | -8,502 | — |
| ABBAS GIZMAN I | Disposition to the Company | 22.5.2026 | 1,530 | -1,530 | $324.21 |
| Nutt Terry L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.5.2026 | 35,741 | -35,741 | $324.21 |
| SCHAEFER STEPHEN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.5.2026 | 45,873 | -45,873 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,435,887 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,272,929 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
48.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 63.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology