Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Communication Services · ·
$189.26
▼ $0.04 (-0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:49 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$185.48 - $190.07
52-Week Range
$176.00 - $226.94
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$178.50
Resistance
$203.04
TKO is a stock from the Communication Services sector — Telecom, media, and internet/social platforms — revenue from advertising and subscriptions.
-6.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 11200.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (60/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
55
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
42
Value
45
Momentum
55
Risk
50
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
51
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING TKO...
Recent media coverage of TKO Group Holdings has focused on its strong financial performance and strategic initiatives. The company reported an 18% revenue increase to $1.547 billion in Q2 2026, prompting it to raise full-year guidance for the second time this year. TKO also declared a $150 million dividend for Q3 2026, while Tikehau Capital disclosed share repurchases. Additionally, TKO expanded its sports-entertainment crossover with a *Clash of Clans* and WWE collaboration, featuring WWE stars like Cody Rhodes and John Cena to engage millions of gamers.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about TKO Group Holdings. News trend score: 86. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
46
Fundamentals
51
Technical
55
Valuation
45
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-5%
Market Narrative
63
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+27
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for TKO suggests a dominant **confirmation bias**—investors appear to be reinforcing positive narratives despite weak revenue growth and modest fundamentals. The extreme narrative gap (+28) and high confirmation bias score (36) indicate traders may be overvaluing recent momentum or news sentiment (100/100) while ignoring stagnant revenue. FOMO (21) and anchoring (21) also play roles, with elevated volume and proximity to resistance potentially fueling speculative interest. The key open question is whether the disconnect between narrative and fundamentals will persist or if traders will reassess as earnings or revenue trends materialize.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:24 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"TKO Group Holdings declared a quarterly cash dividend of approximately $150 million for Q3 2026"
"Revenue climbed 18% to $1.547 billion for Q2 2026, pushing TKO to raise full-year guidance for the second time this year"
"Tikehau Capital disclosed multiple share repurchase disclosures (August–September 2026)"
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 72/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 6/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s divergent verdicts reflect stark contrasts between methodologies prioritizing momentum, crowd psychology, and fundamental stability. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score suggests the stock may be oversold and cyclically positioned for a rebound, aligning with his technical and cyclical approach. Meanwhile, Philip Fisher and Benjamin Graham’s near-zero scores indicate a severe mismatch with their strict growth-quality and defensive criteria, as neither sees the depth of earnings power or margin of safety they demand. In the middle, Peter Lynch and Howard Marks acknowledge some growth potential but warn that the stock’s valuation may already reflect those gains, leaving little room for further upside. Meanwhile, risk-averse voices like Walter Bagehot and Gerald M. Loeb flag liquidity and volatility concerns, while Jesse Livermore’s low score signals a direct conflict with the prevailing trend—highlighting how even the same data can be interpreted as either a buying opportunity or a red flag depending on the framework.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 72
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 68
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 57
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 45
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 37
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 37
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 37
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 29
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 25
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 14
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 9
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 6
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
59.8%
Operating Margin
17.6%
Net Margin
4.1%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
5.2%
ROA
1.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.42
Cash
$831.10M
Total Debt
$3.76B
Current Ratio
1.26
Debt/Equity
1.07
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.790 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.790 |
| 16.3.2026 | $0.780 |
| 15.3.2026 | $0.780 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.780 |
| 14.12.2025 | $0.780 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.760 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.760 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.380 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.380 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.380 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.380 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$19.27
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.11
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 14 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Business Wire · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Business Wire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
PR Newswire · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
ChartMill · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 21.8.2026
Yahoo · 19.8.2026
TKO Group Holdings (TKO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 55/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
TKO currently scores 55/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
TKO's technical score is 55/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 11200.0%; Net income growth: 1977.0%; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Revenue growth (last year): -3.1%; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — TKO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 17 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khan Nick | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 600 | -600 | $201.91 |
| Khan Nick | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 2,246 | -2,246 | $201.11 |
| Khan Nick | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 1,400 | -1,400 | $199.18 |
| Khan Nick | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 600 | -600 | $200.05 |
| Khan Nick | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $197.60 |
| Khan Nick | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 300 | -300 | $196.31 |
| Khan Nick | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 400 | -400 | $192.84 |
| Khan Nick | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 8,248 | -8,248 | $194.39 |
| SHAPIRO MARK S | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 19,120 | -19,120 | $194.39 |
| Emanuel Ariel | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 24,702 | -24,702 | $194.39 |
| Schleimer Andrew M | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 9,942 | -9,942 | $194.39 |
| Khan Nick | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 14,794 | -14,794 | — |
| Khan Nick | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 14,794 | +14,794 | — |
| SHAPIRO MARK S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 36,984 | -36,984 | — |
| SHAPIRO MARK S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 36,984 | +36,984 | — |
| Emanuel Ariel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 44,381 | -44,381 | — |
| Emanuel Ariel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 44,381 | +44,381 | — |
| Schleimer Andrew M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 17,753 | -17,753 | — |
| Schleimer Andrew M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 17.8.2026 | 17,753 | +17,753 | — |
| Khan Nick | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 1,989 | -1,989 | $199.14 |
| Khan Nick | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 900 | -900 | $198.24 |
| Khan Nick | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 2,400 | -2,400 | $196.96 |
| Khan Nick | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 3,800 | -3,800 | $196.29 |
| Khan Nick | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 500 | -500 | $195.04 |
| Khan Nick | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 48,433 | -500 | $195.04 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,433,634 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,029,283 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
63.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 60.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology