Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$206.60
▲ $5.18 (+2.6%)
Market data updated: 09/18 01:48 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$59.81B
Day Range
$201.09 - $211.78
52-Week Range
$190.27 - $252.56
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
TEL is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-3.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $152.46 vs. price $206.60 (-26.2%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
45
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
49
Risk
62
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
69
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING TEL...
Recent media coverage of TE Connectivity (NYSE: TEL) has focused on its valuation and dividend appeal. Analysts highlight its strong profitability, solid financials, and consistent dividend growth, with the stock occasionally labeled as undervalued—some reports suggesting it may be 18% to 21% undervalued based on cash flow or intrinsic value assessments. While the company has delivered strong long-term returns (around 63% over three years), recent short-term share declines have drawn attention, with mixed opinions on whether the dip reflects true undervaluation or temporary weakness. Dividend-focused discussions also emphasize its reliability and low payout ratio.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about TE Connectivity. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
51
Fundamentals
69
Technical
49
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-5%
Market Narrative
76
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+34
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for TEL suggests a dominant narrative-reality disconnect, with overconfidence and euphoria driving valuation despite modest momentum and neutral RSI. The 34% premium to DCF fair value, combined with price outperforming EPS growth, implies investors may be overestimating growth potential. The lack of panic or loss aversion signals further supports complacency, though the peer underperformance hints at selective herding. The key question is whether this premium reflects justified optimism or an unsustainable valuation bubble.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:21 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"TE Connectivity stock has delivered a strong three-year return, yet several valuation checks point to a market price that still sits below an internally estimated intrinsic value."
"TE Connectivity (TEL) passes Best Dividend screen: 8/10 dividend, 8/10 profitability, 7/10 health, low 28% payout, steady growth."
"TE Connectivity operates at significant scale across transportation and industrial connectivity markets."
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 76/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with top-tier investors like Edgar Lawrence Smith and Morgan Housel seeing it as a long-term ‘buy and hold’ candidate, scoring it in the high 60s and praising its potential for quiet compounding. Their optimism contrasts sharply with the more cautious or critical verdicts from others: Howard Marks and the efficient-market duo both flag mixed signals, while Philip Fisher and Peter Lynch dismiss it outright for lacking the growth or valuation edge they demand. Meanwhile, value-focused thinkers like Benjamin Graham and Samuel Armstrong Nelson reject it entirely, with Graham calling it statistically unfit for even his more flexible ‘Enterprising Investor’ criteria. The divide isn’t just between growth and value—it’s also about patience versus skepticism, with crowd psychology (Mackay) and market cycle positioning (Nelson) adding further friction, while trend-followers like Livermore and Schwager’s wizards see no clear edge to exploit.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 76
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 65
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 49
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 47
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 47
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 39
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 31
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 24
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 23
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 18
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 16
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$190.27
Range Bottom
$221.98
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
35.2%
Operating Margin
18.6%
Net Margin
10.7%
EBITDA Margin
23.5%
ROE
14.6%
ROA
7.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$6.20
Cash
$1.25B
Total Debt
$5.69B
Current Ratio
1.56
Debt/Equity
0.45
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 21.8.2026 | $0.780 |
| 22.5.2026 | $0.780 |
| 21.5.2026 | $0.780 |
| 20.2.2026 | $0.710 |
| 19.2.2026 | $0.710 |
| 22.8.2025 | $0.710 |
| 21.8.2025 | $0.710 |
| 21.5.2025 | $0.710 |
| 20.5.2025 | $0.710 |
| 21.2.2025 | $0.650 |
| 20.2.2025 | $0.650 |
| 22.11.2024 | $0.650 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$206.60
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$152.46
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-26.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
2.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1% | $3.27B | $3.00B |
| 2 | 2.2% | $3.34B | $2.81B |
| 3 | 2.3% | $3.42B | $2.64B |
| 4 | 2.4% | $3.50B | $2.48B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $3.59B | $2.33B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$3.20B
Terminal Value
$56.57B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$36.76B
Enterprise Value
$50.03B
Net Debt
$4.44B
Equity Value
$45.59B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$42.09
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$10.81
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 3 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
ChartMill · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
ChartMill · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
TE Connectivity (TEL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
TEL currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, TEL's estimated fair value is $152.46, which is 26.2% below the current price of $206.60. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
TEL's technical score is 49/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.45; Current ratio: 1.56.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $152.46 vs. price $206.60 (-26.2%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -40.4%; Net income growth: -42.3%.
Yes — TEL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAGAR MALAVIKA | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 3.868 | +3.868 | — |
| SHAFFER REUBEN M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 5.264 | +5.264 | — |
| SAGAR MALAVIKA | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 1,047 | +4 | — |
| SHAFFER REUBEN M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 1,425 | +5 | — |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 9,400 | +9,400 | $93.63 |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 9,400 | -9,400 | — |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 9,400 | -9,400 | $215.00 |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 35,376 | +9,400 | $93.63 |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 25,976 | -9,400 | $215.00 |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 0 | -9,400 | — |
| SAGAR MALAVIKA | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 1,043 | -1,043 | — |
| SAGAR MALAVIKA | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 297.16 | -297.16 | $203.15 |
| SAGAR MALAVIKA | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 1,043 | +1,043 | — |
| SAGAR MALAVIKA | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 6,798 | +1,043 | — |
| SAGAR MALAVIKA | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 6,500 | -297 | $203.15 |
| SAGAR MALAVIKA | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.5.2026 | 1,043 | -1,043 | — |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 9,400 | -9,400 | — |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Open Market Sale | 6.5.2026 | 9,400 | -9,400 | $215.00 |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 9,400 | +9,400 | $93.63 |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 35,376 | +9,400 | $93.63 |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Open Market Sale | 6.5.2026 | 25,976 | -9,400 | $215.00 |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 9,400 | -9,400 | — |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.4.2026 | 9,400 | -9,400 | $93.63 |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Open Market Sale | 8.4.2026 | 4,930 | -4,930 | $222.85 |
| Kroeger Shadrak W | Open Market Sale | 8.4.2026 | 4,470 | -4,470 | $223.72 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
9,423,291 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 9,303,426 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
42.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 38.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology