Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$2.93
▼ $0.13 (-4.2%)
Market data updated: 09/18 07:45 AM
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$2.93 - $3.25
52-Week Range
⚠️ Data anomaly
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
SLMT is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-96.2% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 0/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
No notable strengths identified.
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 11.6% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
26
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
10
Risk
34
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Brera Holdings PLC** has centered on **corporate governance disputes and legal challenges**, particularly a **contested re-election of its board** in June 2026, where external shareholders voted the board out before a last-minute share manipulation restored their positions. The company has also faced **derivative lawsuits** (June 2026) alleging **breach of fiduciary duty, shareholder oppression, and self-dealing** by directors. Additionally, Brera’s association with **Cathie Wood’s failed crypto investments**—including a collapsed football group-linked crypto play—has drawn scrutiny, with its stock plummeting over 90%. No direct updates on Brera’s core operations were found in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Brera Holdings PLC. News trend score: 62. Reason: 3 of the last 13 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
37
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
—
Technical
10
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-49%
Market Narrative
37
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
SLMT’s psychology is dominated by **loss aversion**, as the 25.9% three-month drop and modest volume suggest investors are hesitant to crystallize losses. Herding behavior is also notable, with the stock’s performance mirroring peers, indicating a shared reluctance to deviate. Meanwhile, the absence of euphoria or panic signals a cautious, risk-averse stance. The key question is whether the muted volume reflects genuine patience or a temporary pause before further capitulation.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:09 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Brera Holdings Board survived re-election only after counting shares issued to itself in contested RDO; external shareholders voted the Board out"
"RBCH Ltd. Files Derivative Lawsuit Against Brera Holdings PLC Directors and Officers for breach of fiduciary duty, shareholder oppression, and self-dealing"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on their documented principles, the model estimates that investors focused on crowd behavior and market cycles—such as Mackay, Nelson, and Marks (cycle view)—assign very high scores, seeing no mania and a favorable cycle position. Those who emphasize real value creation and risk pricing—Veblen and Marks (risk view)—give moderately high but lower scores, reflecting alignment with value but acknowledging some risk. Methodologies that require detailed balance‑sheet, valuation or growth data (Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot, Graham‑Enterprising) default to neutral 50 scores, while Schwager finds no clear edge and the efficient‑market advocates (Malkiel/Bogle) and Loeb flag significant risk, resulting in low scores. Finally, trend‑following and volatility‑averse approaches (Livermore, Housel) produce the lowest scores, indicating a negative trend and volatility that would deter patient holders.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 95
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 94
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 35
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 22
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 11
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 13 articles.
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 24.8.2026
Benzinga · 31.7.2026
Business Wire · 22.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 29.6.2026
TheStreet · 27.6.2026
GlobeNewswire · 25.6.2026
Financial Times · 25.6.2026
GlobeNewswire · 22.6.2026
Cryptonews · 16.6.2026
decrypt · 15.6.2026
Business Wire · 10.6.2026
MT Newswires · 9.6.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Brera Holdings PLC (SLMT) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for SLMT specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
SLMT's technical score is 10/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 11.6% of price; Calmar: -0.72 (3y annualized return -71.4% / max drawdown 99.0%); Price is below the 50-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SLMT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 4 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 10 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simha Erez | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.7.2026 | 42,212 | +42,212 | — |
| Simha Erez | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.7.2026 | 68,193 | +42,212 | — |
| Maimon Keren Kalima | Open Market Purchase | 21.5.2026 | 1,149,000 | +1,149,000 | $4.97 |
| Sade Ron | Open Market Purchase | 21.5.2026 | 1,149,000 | +1,149,000 | $4.97 |
| Maimon Keren Kalima | Open Market Purchase | 21.5.2026 | 1,336,868 | +1,149,000 | $4.97 |
| Sade Ron | Open Market Purchase | 21.5.2026 | 1,340,646 | +1,149,000 | $4.97 |
| Fischer Viktor | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 3.4.2026 | 1,878,988 | -1,878,988 | $0.05 |
| Fischer Viktor | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 3.4.2026 | 1,878,988 | +1,878,988 | $0.05 |
| Fischer Viktor | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 3.4.2026 | 8,378,988 | +1,878,988 | $0.05 |
| Fischer Viktor | Option Exercise (in-the-money) | 3.4.2026 | 0 | -1,878,988 | $0.05 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
227,040 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 317,403 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
30.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 30.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology