Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$63.36
▼ $1.68 (-2.6%)
Market data updated: 09/19 11:19 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$13.33B
Day Range
$63.17 - $64.86
52-Week Range
$60.39 - $98.56
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$61.67
Resistance
$76.49
SGI is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-26.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 51.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $44.59 vs. price $63.36 (-29.6%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
41
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
16d ago · $67.82
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 9 to 35 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
51
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
13
Risk
34
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
55
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Somnigroup International Inc. (SGI) has centered on its recent all-stock acquisition of Leggett & Platt, a deal expected to create a combined entity with over $11 billion in sales and 36,000 employees. Analysts highlight potential growth, with synergy targets of $75 million and EPS accretion of $0.35–$0.40 annually. Stock valuations remain debated, as DCF models suggest upside despite mixed market multiples, while analysts like Piper Sandler and BofA maintain bullish outlooks, raising price targets to $100 and $81, respectively. The company’s 61.6% three-year stock gain also draws attention amid discussions of small-cap challenges.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Somnigroup International Inc.. News trend score: 74. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
47
Fundamentals
55
Technical
13
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-16%
Market Narrative
66
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+30
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
SGI’s market behavior suggests traders are overconfident, as price momentum outpaces fundamental growth and valuation exceeds intrinsic estimates by 56%. The narrative gap (42 points) further implies optimism may outpace reality, consistent with euphoric overestimation. However, the stock remains modestly below its 200-day average, tempering extreme euphoria. The key question is whether momentum can sustain itself amid potential valuation rebalancing. FOMO remains present but secondary to overconfidence.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:29 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Somnigroup International’s latest catalyst... creating a business with more than US$11b in trailing sales and about 36,000 employees worldwide."
"Piper Sandler analyst Peter Keith reiterates Somnigroup International with a Overweight and raises the price target from $95 to $100."
"The company has lifted its annual synergy target to roughly US$75m and indicated a US$0.10 increase in annual guidance."
"Somnigroup International stock has delivered a strong 61.6% gain over the past three years, yet current checks send a mixed message, with a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) intrinsic value estimate pointing to upside while market-based multiples lean the other way."
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for SGI reflects a clash between passive indexers and rigorous value investors. Burton Malkiel and John Bogle’s efficient-market approach gives it a modest 65, suggesting it *might* justify deviation from a broad index—likely because its volatility or sector-specific traits could align with a diversified strategy. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s traditional value filters (scoring 0) and Samuel Nelson’s overbought cycle warning (7) paint a picture of speculative risk, while Gerald Loeb’s 20 and Walter Bagehot’s 0 flag liquidity and capital-preservation concerns. Even Philip Fisher (43) and Peter Lynch (30) dismiss it for lacking growth quality or reasonable valuation, while Jesse Livermore’s 38 and Howard Marks’ 31 highlight structural trend or risk misalignments. The contrast underscores how SGI’s perceived volatility and speculative traits repel disciplined value hunters but could theoretically fit niche strategies—like Malkiel’s index tilt—where short-term deviations are acceptable.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 89
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 59
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 49
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 43
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 37
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 30
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 26
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 18
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 15
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 1
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 0
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
42.6%
Operating Margin
10.1%
Net Margin
5.1%
EBITDA Margin
14.0%
ROE
12.4%
ROA
3.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.86
Cash
$134.90M
Total Debt
$4.61B
Current Ratio
0.83
Debt/Equity
1.48
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 20.8.2026 | $0.170 |
| 21.5.2026 | $0.170 |
| 20.5.2026 | $0.170 |
| 5.3.2026 | $0.170 |
| 4.3.2026 | $0.170 |
| 20.11.2025 | $0.150 |
| 19.11.2025 | $0.150 |
| 21.8.2025 | $0.150 |
| 20.8.2025 | $0.150 |
| 22.5.2025 | $0.150 |
| 21.5.2025 | $0.150 |
| 6.3.2025 | $0.150 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$63.36
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$44.59
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-29.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
17.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.3% | $742.58M | $681.27M |
| 2 | 13.6% | $843.43M | $709.90M |
| 3 | 9.9% | $926.82M | $715.67M |
| 4 | 6.2% | $984.22M | $697.25M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.01B | $655.67M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$633.20M
Terminal Value
$15.91B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$10.34B
Enterprise Value
$13.80B
Net Debt
$4.47B
Equity Value
$9.33B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$14.86
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$19.48
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Somnigroup International Inc. (SGI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 41/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SGI currently scores 41/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SGI's estimated fair value is $44.59, which is 29.6% below the current price of $63.36. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SGI's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 51.6%; Gross margin: 42.6% — strong; Free cash flow growth: 11.2%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $44.59 vs. price $63.36 (-29.6%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Current ratio: 0.83.
Yes — SGI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THOMPSON SCOTT L | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 30,000 | +30,000 | $62.84 |
| THOMPSON SCOTT L | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 4,123,634 | +30,000 | $62.84 |
| GLASSMAN KARL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 55,923 | +55,923 | — |
| GLASSMAN KARL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 55,923 | +55,923 | — |
| GLASSMAN KARL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 48,369 | +48,369 | — |
| HAGALE JAMES TYSON | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 6,148 | +6,148 | — |
| HAGALE JAMES TYSON | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 9,222 | +9,222 | — |
| GLASSMAN KARL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 37,282 | +37,282 | — |
| HAGALE JAMES TYSON | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 4,992 | +4,992 | — |
| HAGALE JAMES TYSON | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 4,811 | +4,811 | — |
| GLASSMAN KARL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 39,105 | +39,105 | — |
| GLASSMAN KARL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 4,239 | +4,239 | — |
| GLASSMAN KARL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 29,136 | +29,136 | — |
| GLASSMAN KARL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 65,556 | +65,556 | — |
| GLASSMAN KARL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 65,556 | +65,556 | — |
| HAGALE JAMES TYSON | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 4,992 | +4,992 | — |
| GLASSMAN KARL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 74,835 | +74,835 | — |
| HAGALE JAMES TYSON | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 10,825 | +10,825 | — |
| GLASSMAN KARL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 5,953 | +5,953 | — |
| GLASSMAN KARL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 48,369 | +48,369 | — |
| HAGALE JAMES TYSON | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 10,825 | +10,825 | — |
| GLASSMAN KARL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 8,009 | +8,009 | — |
| HAGALE JAMES TYSON | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 9,221 | +9,221 | — |
| HAGALE JAMES TYSON | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 8,978 | +8,978 | — |
| GLASSMAN KARL G | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.8.2026 | 10,749 | +10,749 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
15,566,762 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 12,759,480 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
66.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 69.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology