Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$22.30
▼ $0.24 (-1.1%)
Market data updated: 09/19 05:49 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$7.38B
Day Range
$22.29 - $22.68
52-Week Range
$22.29 - $34.48
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$22.29
Resistance
$31.64
SARO is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-20.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1975.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $8.34 vs. price $22.30 (-62.6%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (79/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
6
Risk
48
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
47
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage of StandardAero has highlighted its operational expansion and strong market positioning. The company opened a 70,000‑sq‑ft expansion in Winnipeg, boosting MRO capacity for airline and military customers, and secured a new U.S. Air Force T56 engine depot‑maintenance contract, underscoring its role in military support. Analysts at Seeking Alpha emphasized robust LEAP/CFM56 MRO growth and a valuation discount despite cash‑flow concerns, while the firm presented its outlook at the Jefferies Global Industrials Conference.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about StandardAero, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
99
Fundamentals
47
Technical
6
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-20%
Market Narrative
67
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+26
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior suggests traders are synchronizing moves relative to peers, despite the stock’s slight underperformance. Euphoria and overconfidence persist due to extreme valuation (+193% above DCF) and detached sentiment (100/100), despite weak momentum. Anchoring near support (2.5%) may reinforce caution, while muted panic (low volatility) hints at controlled selling. The key question: *Will traders pivot from herding to defensive anchoring if support breaks?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:27 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"StandardAero awarded position on the U.S. Air Force’s new T56 engine depot maintenance contract (Yahoo, 8)"
"70,000 sq. ft. expansion at Winnipeg facility boosting MRO capacity (Yahoo, 3)"
"Profitable LEAP/CFM56 MRO growth, EV/EBITDA discount catalysts (SeekingAlpha, 5)"
"Stock trades below fair value despite improved outlook (Yahoo, 12)"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with top-tier technical and growth-oriented investors like Samuel Armstrong Nelson (94) and Peter Lynch (86) seeing it as a high-potential play—either near an oversold cycle bottom or undervalued relative to its growth potential. Meanwhile, disciplined traders like Jack Schwager (81) and mid-cycle strategists (e.g., Howard Marks’ cycle approach at 66) also view it favorably, though with slightly more caution. On the other end, value purists like Benjamin Graham (18) and Graham’s Enterprising Investor framework (31) dismiss it outright, arguing it lacks the statistical safety margins or defensive qualities he demanded. Even moderate risk-takers like Gerald Loeb (48) and Morgan Housel (48) hesitate, framing it as holdable but not compelling enough to justify aggressive bets. The contrast highlights a tension between growth momentum (backed by Lynch, Nelson, and Schwager) and deep-value skepticism (Graham, Livermore), while crowd psychology (Mackay’s 65) and efficiency doubts (Malkiel/Bogle’s 46) add further nuance.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 86
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 81
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 77
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 65
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 61
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 52
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 52
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 48
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 25
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 20
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
14.8%
Operating Margin
9.1%
Net Margin
4.6%
EBITDA Margin
12.3%
ROE
10.4%
ROA
4.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.84
Cash
$289.72M
Total Debt
$2.21B
Current Ratio
2.20
Debt/Equity
0.83
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$22.30
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$8.34
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-62.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
13.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.5% | $265.91M | $243.95M |
| 2 | 10.7% | $294.47M | $247.85M |
| 3 | 8.0% | $318.02M | $245.57M |
| 4 | 5.2% | $334.71M | $237.11M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $343.07M | $222.97M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$234.30M
Terminal Value
$5.41B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$3.52B
Enterprise Value
$4.71B
Net Debt
$1.92B
Equity Value
$2.79B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$7.98
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$0.55
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 6 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Business Wire · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 18.8.2026
Business Wire · 18.8.2026
Yahoo · 18.8.2026
MT Newswires · 18.8.2026
Business Wire · 18.8.2026
Benzinga · 18.8.2026
Yahoo · 16.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 16.8.2026
Yahoo · 16.8.2026
StandardAero, Inc. (SARO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SARO currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SARO's estimated fair value is $8.34, which is 62.6% below the current price of $22.30. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SARO's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1975.0%; Free cash flow growth: 980.7%; Net income growth: 2427.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $8.34 vs. price $22.30 (-62.6%); Calmar: -0.54 (3y annualized return -17.8% / max drawdown 32.7%); Price is below the 50-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SARO.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 20 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 41 | -41 | $30.00 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 295,532 | -41 | $30.00 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 20,413 | -20,413 | $30.56 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 295,573 | -20,413 | $30.56 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 40,000 | -40,000 | $31.42 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 315,986 | -40,000 | $31.42 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 40,000 | -40,000 | $30.89 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 355,986 | -40,000 | $30.89 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 40,000 | -40,000 | $30.24 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 395,986 | -40,000 | $30.24 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 10,969 | -10,969 | $30.04 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 435,986 | -10,969 | $30.04 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 40,000 | -40,000 | $30.12 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 446,955 | -40,000 | $30.12 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 40,000 | -40,000 | $30.44 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 486,955 | -40,000 | $30.44 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 2.7.2026 | 40,000 | -40,000 | $30.24 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 2.7.2026 | 526,955 | -40,000 | $30.24 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 40,000 | -40,000 | $30.23 |
| Ford Russell Wayne | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 566,955 | -40,000 | $30.23 |
| KERR DEREK J | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 6,608 | +6,608 | — |
| CLARE PETER J | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 6,608 | +6,608 | — |
| Weingartner Stefan | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 6,608 | +6,608 | — |
| Masiello Wendy Motlong | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 6,608 | +6,608 | — |
| McElhinney Paul | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 6,608 | +6,608 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
16,326,482 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 16,592,789 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
65.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 70.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology