Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$501.01
▲ $6.54 (+1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:41 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$15.86B
Day Range
$493.24 - $503.17
52-Week Range
$364.50 - $667.69
Beta
—
Next Earnings
29.10.2026
Support
$471.57
Resistance
$606.35
RBC is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+30.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 19/33 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 40.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $169.48 vs. price $501.01 (-66.2%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (73/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
61
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
73
Quality
63
Value
33
Momentum
47
Risk
62
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
68
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of RBC Bearings Incorporated highlights its strong financial performance, with Q1 2027 reports showing robust revenue, profit, and backlog growth, though some analysts note its valuation may be high compared to peers. The company’s stock has outperformed the market over the past decade, with notable gains and oversold conditions signaling potential buying opportunities. Analysts also mention RBC Bearings’ position in the engineered components sector amid broader industry trends.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about RBC Bearings Incorporated. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
32
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
48
Fundamentals
68
Technical
47
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-22%
Market Narrative
80
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+38
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant **Loss Aversion** (54) reflects a cautious stance after a 14.5% drop, with traders hesitant to lock in losses despite muted volume. **Overconfidence** (45) and **Euphoria** (35) are misplaced given weak momentum and valuation extremes, while **Anchoring** (52) highlights proximity to support. The **narrative-reality gap** (31) suggests traders overestimate positives. The key question: *Will traders accept further declines, or will support hold?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:16 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"RBC Bearings Q1 2027 shows strong revenue, profit, and backlog growth"
"RSI near 30, signaling oversold conditions and potential buying opportunities"
"RBC Bearings has outperformed the market over the past 10 years by 6.54% on an annualized basis"
"Unpacking Q2 Earnings: RBC Bearings in the context of other Engineered Components and Systems Stocks"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 27/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for RBC reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. At the top, Nelson’s cyclical analysis and Smith’s long-term buy-and-hold framework both see RBC as a strong candidate—Nelson flags it as oversold, while Smith views it as a decade-long hold. Meanwhile, Schwager and Fisher, though slightly more cautious, still identify disciplined or solid setups, emphasizing reward/risk and quality. Conversely, Graham’s strict defensive criteria and Livermore’s trend-following rules slam the door shut, dismissing it as overvalued or counter-trend. In the middle, Marks (cycle) and Housel lean positive, seeing early-cycle potential or quiet compounding, while Loeb and Mackay offer guarded approval, balancing caution with moderate optimism. The contrast between the high-scoring cyclical/long-term investors and the low-scoring value/trend followers underscores whether RBC’s appeal lies in its macro positioning or its fundamental or technical weaknesses.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 87
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 82
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 75
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 74
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 70
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 63
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 55
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 46
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 45
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 45
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 29
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 27
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (6 bullish · 6 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
44.4%
Operating Margin
22.5%
Net Margin
15.4%
EBITDA Margin
29.4%
ROE
8.6%
ROA
5.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$9.14
Cash
$57.30M
Total Debt
$875.50M
Current Ratio
2.18
Debt/Equity
0.26
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 29.9.2022 | $0.350 |
| 28.9.2022 | $0.350 |
| 29.6.2022 | $0.350 |
| 28.6.2022 | $0.350 |
| 30.3.2022 | $0.330 |
| 29.3.2022 | $0.330 |
| 30.12.2021 | $0.330 |
| 29.12.2021 | $0.330 |
| 5.10.2021 | $6.990 |
| 4.10.2021 | $6.990 |
| 30.9.2021 | $0.330 |
| 29.9.2021 | $0.330 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$501.01
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$169.48
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-66.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
8.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.5% | $371.61M | $340.93M |
| 2 | 7.0% | $397.53M | $334.59M |
| 3 | 5.5% | $419.33M | $323.80M |
| 4 | 4.0% | $436.07M | $308.92M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $446.97M | $290.50M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$342.60M
Terminal Value
$7.05B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$4.58B
Enterprise Value
$6.18B
Net Debt
$818.20M
Equity Value
$5.36B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$106.24
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$0.65
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Fintel · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Business Wire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
ChartMill · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 61/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
RBC currently scores 61/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, RBC's estimated fair value is $169.48, which is 66.2% below the current price of $501.01. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
RBC's technical score is 47/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 40.5%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.26.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $169.48 vs. price $501.01 (-66.2%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — RBC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feeney John J. | Open Market Sale | 25.6.2026 | 225 | -225 | $657.94 |
| Feeney John J. | Open Market Sale | 25.6.2026 | 2,378 | -225 | $657.94 |
| Ennico Dolores J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 200 | +200 | $127.33 |
| Ennico Dolores J | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 600 | -600 | $636.11 |
| Ennico Dolores J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 400 | -400 | — |
| Ennico Dolores J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 200 | -200 | — |
| Ennico Dolores J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 400 | +400 | $199.16 |
| Ennico Dolores J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 7,454 | +200 | $127.33 |
| Ennico Dolores J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 7,854 | +400 | $199.16 |
| Ennico Dolores J | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 7,254 | -600 | $636.11 |
| Ennico Dolores J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.6.2026 | 0 | -400 | — |
| Kaplan Steven H. | Open Market Sale | 17.6.2026 | 350 | -350 | $631.80 |
| Kaplan Steven H. | Open Market Sale | 17.6.2026 | 1,378 | -350 | $631.80 |
| Feeney John J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.6.2026 | 95 | -95 | $578.34 |
| Stewart Edward | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.6.2026 | 600 | +600 | $199.16 |
| Stewart Edward | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.6.2026 | 600 | -600 | — |
| Edwards Richard J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.6.2026 | 364 | -364 | $578.34 |
| Sullivan Robert M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.6.2026 | 272 | -272 | $578.34 |
| Stewart Edward | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 600 | -600 | $592.83 |
| Boyan Barry C. | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 555 | -555 | $591.63 |
| Boyan Barry C. | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 3,751 | -555 | $591.63 |
| Stewart Edward | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.6.2026 | 21,937 | +600 | $199.16 |
| Stewart Edward | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 21,337 | -600 | $592.83 |
| Stewart Edward | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.6.2026 | 400 | -600 | — |
| Feeney John J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.6.2026 | 2,603 | -95 | $578.34 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
518,728 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 486,053 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology