Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$2.21
▼ $0.10 (-4.3%)
Market data updated: 09/19 03:56 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$842.93M
Day Range
$2.19 - $2.40
52-Week Range
$2.09 - $4.42
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$2.09
Resistance
$4.36
PLTK is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-36.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/32 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $17.43 vs. price $2.21 (+688.6%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -0.2% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
45
Quality
47
Value
62
Momentum
39
Risk
40
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
42
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Playtika Holding Corp. (PLTK) has centered on its stock volatility, financial performance, and valuation concerns. Analysts like Citigroup and Roth Capital have adjusted price targets downward, reflecting mixed sentiment amid a 41% stock decline over a month, weak bookings, and Nasdaq compliance risks. However, the company’s shift toward direct-to-consumer (D2C) sales—now accounting for 39.3% of revenue—has been highlighted as a positive turnaround, sparking debates over its undervalued potential. Earnings reports and pre-release speculation also dominated discussions.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Playtika Holding Corp.. News trend score: 56. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
10
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
94
Fundamentals
42
Technical
39
Valuation
62
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-33%
Market Narrative
41
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+5
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
PLTK’s market behavior suggests a dominant **loss aversion** bias, as the 29.5% three-month decline and subdued volume (0.77x average) indicate traders are hesitant to crystallize losses. The narrative-reality gap (-8) hints at a disconnect where sentiment (28) lags fundamentals (36), reinforcing caution. Low FOMO (score 2) and muted panic (24) imply neither urgency nor extreme selling—just defensive positioning. The key question: *Will traders accept further declines, or will a near-term catalyst (e.g., volume spike) force a re-evaluation?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:09 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Citigroup maintains Playtika Holding with a Buy but lowers price target to $4"
"SNAL stock dips 41% in a month"
"PLTK stock is a strong buy due to valuation disconnect"
"Playtika shifting to D2C sales, now 39.3% of revenue"
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 30/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between cyclical, contrarian, and fundamental approaches. The highest-scoring methodologies—Charles Mackay, Howard Marks (Market Cycle), and Samuel Armstrong Nelson—all see it as a favorable cycle position, free from mania or overextension, suggesting a disciplined, bottom-fishing perspective. In contrast, the lowest scores from Loeb, Bagehot, and Veblen flag it as risky due to liquidity concerns, speculative growth motives, or capital-threatening volatility, aligning with risk-averse or structural critiques. Meanwhile, Graham’s Defensive and Enterprising stances split between cautious attraction and insufficient data, while Lynch and Fisher dismiss it outright for lacking growth or quality. The middle ground—Schwager, Bogle, and Housel—balances reward/risk favorably but acknowledges it’s neither a slam dunk nor a passive hold, illustrating a spectrum from opportunistic to pragmatic caution.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 96
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 96
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 76
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 75
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 48
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 44
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 37
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 36
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 36
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 32
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 30
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 30
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
72.5%
Operating Margin
-0.2%
Net Margin
-7.5%
EBITDA Margin
-0.2%
ROE
50.2%
ROA
-5.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.55
Cash
$684.20M
Total Debt
$2.39B
Current Ratio
1.10
Debt/Equity
-5.81
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 26.12.2025 | $0.100 |
| 25.12.2025 | $0.100 |
| 26.9.2025 | $0.100 |
| 25.9.2025 | $0.100 |
| 23.6.2025 | $0.100 |
| 22.6.2025 | $0.100 |
| 21.3.2025 | $0.100 |
| 20.3.2025 | $0.100 |
| 20.12.2024 | $0.100 |
| 19.12.2024 | $0.100 |
| 20.9.2024 | $0.100 |
| 19.9.2024 | $0.100 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$2.21
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$17.43
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+688.6%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
1.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.8% | $541.21M | $496.53M |
| 2 | 2.0% | $552.09M | $464.69M |
| 3 | 2.2% | $564.09M | $435.58M |
| 4 | 2.3% | $577.27M | $408.96M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $591.71M | $384.57M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$531.40M
Terminal Value
$9.33B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$6.06B
Enterprise Value
$8.25B
Net Debt
$1.70B
Equity Value
$6.55B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$1.09
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$6.74
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 9 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.8.2026
Zacks · 17.8.2026
Motley Fool · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 10.8.2026
Business Wire · 10.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 10.8.2026
Moby · 7.8.2026
MarketBeat · 7.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
MT Newswires · 6.8.2026
Zacks · 6.8.2026
Zacks · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
ChartMill · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
Playtika Holding Corp. (PLTK) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
PLTK currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, PLTK's estimated fair value is $17.43, which is 688.6% above the current price of $2.21. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
PLTK's technical score is 39/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $17.43 vs. price $2.21 (+688.6%); Return on equity (ROE): 50.2% — strong; Debt/equity: -5.81.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -0.2% (negative); Net margin: -7.5% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
Yes — PLTK has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lee Tae | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.8.2026 | 533,127 | -1,241 | $2.94 |
| Lee Tae | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.8.2026 | 1,241 | -1,241 | $2.94 |
| Korczak Nir | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 64,154 | +64,154 | — |
| Cohen Michael Daniel | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 160,385 | +160,385 | — |
| Sandler Ariel | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 121,180 | +121,180 | — |
| Antokol Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 2,245,389 | +2,245,389 | — |
| Antokol Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 1,122,694 | +1,122,694 | — |
| Sandler Ariel | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 60,590 | +60,590 | — |
| Lee Tae | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 346,051 | +346,051 | — |
| Cohen Michael Daniel | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 320,770 | +320,770 | — |
| Brudno Gili | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 213,847 | +213,847 | — |
| Brudno Gili | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 106,923 | +106,923 | — |
| Korczak Nir | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 128,308 | +128,308 | — |
| Lee Tae | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 692,101 | +692,101 | — |
| Cohen Michael Daniel | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 987,624 | +160,385 | — |
| Cohen Michael Daniel | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 582,208 | +320,770 | — |
| Korczak Nir | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 926,671 | +64,154 | — |
| Korczak Nir | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 383,210 | +128,308 | — |
| Antokol Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 20,620,549 | +1,122,694 | — |
| Antokol Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 3,838,853 | +2,245,389 | — |
| Brudno Gili | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 517,822 | +106,923 | — |
| Brudno Gili | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 318,423 | +213,847 | — |
| Sandler Ariel | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 831,319 | +60,590 | — |
| Sandler Ariel | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 310,723 | +121,180 | — |
| Lee Tae | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 534,368 | +346,051 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,325,733 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,600,594 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
68.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology