Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$18.60
▲ $0.29 (+1.6%)
Market data updated: 09/19 11:40 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$18.26 - $18.82
52-Week Range
$13.84 - $36.15
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$18.05
Resistance
$25.73
PINS is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-48.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $37.59 vs. price $18.60 (+102.1%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.4% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
15d ago · $20.85
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 2 to 32 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
51
Quality
63
Value
62
Momentum
9
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
62
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Pinterest, Inc.** has primarily focused on its **Q2 earnings performance**, where underlying growth was described as stronger than market perceptions suggest, despite temporary factors influencing its Q3 guidance. Analysts noted the stock’s **9.2% decline since the last earnings report**, prompting speculation about future stock movements and earnings estimates. Additionally, an **insider sold shares worth over $2 million**, raising attention to internal confidence or financial strategy. No broader operational or product-related developments were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Pinterest, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
31
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
40
Fundamentals
62
Technical
9
Valuation
62
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-8%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
-2
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market is anchored near support, with price just 1.1% above it. A 13.3% price drop, oversold RSI of 31, and volume 1.15× the average reinforce focus on this level. Panic‑selling at a modest score shows some pressure, while low FOMO and zero herding indicate little buying enthusiasm. No evidence of confirmation bias or loss aversion appears. The key question is whether a break below support will shift anchoring.
Updated: 09/10/2026, 05:41 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Pinterest (PINS) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock? We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues."
"Pinterest's Q2 results were strong, and temporary factors make Q3 guidance appear weaker than actual underlying growth."
"Pinterest (PINS) is down 9.2% since last earnings report."
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 24/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Walter Bagehot's documented focus on liquidity, the model estimates a perfect score, while Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s cycle‑position criteria also yield a near‑perfect rating, reflecting the stock’s strong balance sheet and favorable market cycle. Charles Mackay, Philip Fisher, Howard Marks, Jack Schwager and Edgar Lawrence Smith similarly assign high marks because they see solid fundamentals, disciplined risk‑reward and a lack of crowd mania. In contrast, Benjamin Graham (both defensive and enterprising), the efficient‑market view of Malkiel & Bogle, Thorstein Veblen and Jesse Livermore give much lower scores, as the stock does not appear sufficiently cheap, aligns poorly with their value‑or growth‑for‑its‑own‑sake concerns, and exhibits a negative trend against Livermore’s core rule. These divergent outcomes illustrate how methodologies that prioritize liquidity and cycle timing can view the stock favorably, whereas those centered on valuation margins, market efficiency, or price trends judge it less attractive.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 80
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 70
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 67
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 59
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 54
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 47
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 25
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 24
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
80.1%
Operating Margin
7.6%
Net Margin
9.9%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
8.8%
ROA
7.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.62
Cash
$969.34M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
7.64
Debt/Equity
0.00
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$18.60
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$37.59
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+102.1%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
14.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14.7% | $1.44B | $1.32B |
| 2 | 11.7% | $1.60B | $1.35B |
| 3 | 8.6% | $1.74B | $1.34B |
| 4 | 5.6% | $1.84B | $1.30B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.88B | $1.22B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.25B
Terminal Value
$29.71B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$19.31B
Enterprise Value
$25.85B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$25.85B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$7.14
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.13
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
MarketBeat · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Trefis · 11.9.2026
Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
PINS currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, PINS's estimated fair value is $37.59, which is 102.1% above the current price of $18.60. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
PINS's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $37.59 vs. price $18.60 (+102.1%); Free cash flow growth: 33.2%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.4% of price; Calmar: -0.16 (3y annualized return -10.8% / max drawdown 65.7%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -77.2%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for PINS.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silbermann Benjamin | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 46,875 | -46,875 | $20.04 |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.9.2026 | 46,875 | +46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 9.9.2026 | 46,875 | -46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.9.2026 | 46,875 | +46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 46,875 | -46,875 | $20.07 |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.9.2026 | 46,875 | -46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 46,875 | -46,875 | $21.63 |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 2.9.2026 | 46,875 | -46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 2.9.2026 | 46,875 | +46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 46,875 | -46,875 | $21.23 |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 1.9.2026 | 46,875 | +46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 1.9.2026 | 46,875 | -46,875 | — |
| Jewell Renee Marie-Bentley | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 108,604 | +108,604 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 26.8.2026 | 46,875 | -46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 46,875 | -46,875 | $23.57 |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 26.8.2026 | 46,875 | +46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 0 | -46,875 | $23.57 |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 26.8.2026 | 46,875 | +46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 26.8.2026 | 34,705,638 | -46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 46,875 | -46,875 | $23.53 |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 25.8.2026 | 46,875 | +46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 25.8.2026 | 46,875 | -46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 25.8.2026 | 34,752,513 | -46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Conversion of Derivative Security | 25.8.2026 | 46,875 | +46,875 | — |
| Silbermann Benjamin | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 0 | -46,875 | $23.53 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
48,091,210 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 50,504,065 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
32.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 41.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology