Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$62.37
▼ $0.62 (-1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 02:10 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$17.18B
Day Range
$62.29 - $62.98
52-Week Range
$35.47 - $67.51
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$54.53
Resistance
$67.51
OVV is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+48.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.54
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
56
Quality
63
Value
55
Momentum
43
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
58
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Ovintiv Inc. highlights its strong financial performance and strategic growth initiatives. Analysts like Seaport Global and Wells Fargo have maintained or upgraded their ratings, praising its outperformance over the past five years with annualized returns of around 18%. The company has also been recognized for its "decent value" status due to solid fundamentals, including low valuation, profitability, and a healthy balance sheet. Additionally, Ovintiv expanded its drilling inventory with a $460 million acquisition spree, securing 41,000 net acres and 240 well locations in key regions like the Permian and Montney.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ovintiv Inc. (DE). News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
40
Fundamentals
58
Technical
43
Valuation
55
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+19%
Market Narrative
57
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+15
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests a disconnect between valuation metrics (+13% above DCF) and technical momentum (-3.8% ROC), consistent with **Confirmation Bias** (highest score, 23) and **Overconfidence** (12). The narrative-reality gap (+18) implies investors may be overemphasizing positive narratives despite stagnant fundamentals. Key open question: Will the misalignment between valuation and fundamentals persist, or will it trigger a reassessment of expectations? The absence of panic or herding signals suggests no immediate urgency, but the elevated confirmation bias could prolong this divergence.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:03 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"adding 41,000 net acres and 240 well locations across the Permian and Montney"
"passes a 'Decent Value' screen: low valuation, solid profitability, healthy balance sheet, and modest growth"
"Ovintiv has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 7.6% on an annualized basis"
"Wells Fargo raises the price target from $78 to $79"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 23/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for OVV split sharply between bullish and cautious views, with Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score (76) standing out as an outlier. His cycle-based approach sees the stock as oversold and positioned for a rebound, contrasting sharply with the majority—including Philip Fisher (36) and Walter Bagehot (23)—who dismiss it outright. Fisher’s quality-focused lens finds no signature of sustained growth, while Bagehot’s liquidity concerns flag systemic risks. Meanwhile, the middle-ground thinkers—like Peter Lynch (55) and Morgan Housel (55)—acknowledge potential but temper enthusiasm, noting the price already reflects much of the perceived value. Even Graham’s stricter tests (50) and Marks’ caution (48) suggest the stock may be overvalued or overhyped, while Livermore’s (43) and Schwager’s (30) outright rejection underscores a lack of clear momentum or disciplined setup.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 90
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 64
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 63
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 62
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 56
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 52
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 51
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 40
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 38
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 36
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 30
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 23
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
12.7%
Net Margin
13.9%
EBITDA Margin
37.2%
ROE
11.1%
ROA
6.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.83
Cash
$35.00M
Total Debt
$5.20B
Current Ratio
0.54
Debt/Equity
0.46
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.300 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.300 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.300 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.300 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.300 |
| 14.12.2025 | $0.300 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.300 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.300 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.300 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.300 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.300 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.300 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$62.37
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$56.67
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-9.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $1.43B | $1.31B |
| 2 | -3.1% | $1.39B | $1.17B |
| 3 | -1.2% | $1.37B | $1.06B |
| 4 | 0.6% | $1.38B | $975.01M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.41B | $916.87M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.50B
Terminal Value
$22.25B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$14.46B
Enterprise Value
$19.88B
Net Debt
$5.17B
Equity Value
$14.72B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$43.11
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$33.19
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Fintel · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
ChartMill · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
MT Newswires · 27.8.2026
MT Newswires · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
CNW Group · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 24.8.2026
ChartMill · 24.8.2026
Ovintiv Inc. (DE) (OVV) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
OVV currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, OVV's estimated fair value is $56.67, which is 9.1% below the current price of $62.37. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
OVV's technical score is 43/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.46; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.54; Calmar: 0.22 (3y annualized return 9.7% / max drawdown 43.9%); Revenue growth (last year): -2.7%.
Yes — OVV has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moore Rachel Maureen | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 72,530 | -7,753 | $63.32 |
| Moore Rachel Maureen | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 7,753 | -7,753 | $63.32 |
| McCracken Brendan Michael | Disposition to the Company | 11.8.2026 | 297,192 | -5,098 | $63.56 |
| McCracken Brendan Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 302,290 | +5,098 | $22.95 |
| McCracken Brendan Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 0 | -5,098 | — |
| McCracken Brendan Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 5,098 | -5,098 | — |
| McCracken Brendan Michael | Disposition to the Company | 11.8.2026 | 5,098 | -5,098 | $63.56 |
| McCracken Brendan Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.8.2026 | 5,098 | +5,098 | $22.95 |
| McCracken Brendan Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.8.2026 | 302,692 | +5,500 | $22.95 |
| McCracken Brendan Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.8.2026 | 5,098 | -5,500 | — |
| McCracken Brendan Michael | Disposition to the Company | 7.8.2026 | 297,192 | -5,500 | $59.86 |
| McCracken Brendan Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.8.2026 | 5,500 | -5,500 | — |
| McCracken Brendan Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 7.8.2026 | 5,500 | +5,500 | $22.95 |
| McCracken Brendan Michael | Disposition to the Company | 7.8.2026 | 5,500 | -5,500 | $59.86 |
| Shaw Brian Gordon | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 38,188 | +404 | — |
| Chhina Sippy | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 3,188 | +404 | — |
| Gentle Meg | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 12,385 | +486 | — |
| King Terri Gay | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 812 | +402 | — |
| IZZO RALPH | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 7,742 | +402 | — |
| Chhina Sippy | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 404 | +404 | — |
| King Terri Gay | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 402 | +402 | — |
| Gentle Meg | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 486 | +486 | — |
| IZZO RALPH | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 402 | +402 | — |
| Shaw Brian Gordon | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 404 | +404 | — |
| Gentle Meg | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 67 | +67 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
11,232,943 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 13,808,783 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
36.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 33.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology