Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Health Care · ·
$369.39
▲ $3.08 (+0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/19 03:44 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$53.25B
Day Range
$358.90 - $369.69
52-Week Range
$157.43 - $369.69
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$248.03
Resistance
$367.00
NTRA is a stock from the Healthcare sector — Pharmaceuticals, biotech, medical devices, and health insurance — less sensitive to economic cycles, but exposed to regulation and FDA approvals.
+102.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 19/32 factors positiveRisk: Low
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 35.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $27.65 vs. price $369.39 (-92.5%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (62/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
8d ago · $327.76
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 61)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
85
Risk
70
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
29
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Natera, Inc. has centered on its rapid stock surge—up nearly 60% in six months to $328 per share—and strong analyst sentiment, with UBS raising its price target to $435, Rothschild & Co initiating coverage with a $385 target, and Jim Cramer labeling it “a promising story” and a “precision‑medicine platform.” Reported themes highlight the company’s expansion into oncology, women’s health and organ‑transplant diagnostics, and its broader appeal to growth‑focused investors.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Natera, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
67
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
82
Fundamentals
29
Technical
85
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+57%
Market Narrative
92
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+50
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
NTRA’s psychology is dominated by **euphoria**, driven by its extreme valuation gap (+1072% above DCF) and sustained distance above long-term averages (+34.7% above 200-day). Overconfidence (45) and herding (44) align with this, as traders may rationalize weak momentum (-0.2% ROC) against fundamentals. The narrative gap (22) suggests optimism outpaces tangible reality, a classic euphoria trait. The key question: *Is the valuation disconnect sustainable, or will it eventually correct?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:57 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"‘New data in *Blood Neoplasia* validating the prognostic and predictive value of Signatera in lymphoma’ (Article 4)"
"‘Natera & Angiex Partner to Evaluate AGX101 Response With Signatera’ (Article 7)"
"‘Stanley Druckenmiller holds ~17% of Duquesne in Natera’ (Article 6)"
"‘Global leader in cell-free DNA and precision medicine’ (Article 4)"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 83/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 1/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies that prioritize long-term fundamentals and those skeptical of its valuation or market positioning. The highest-scoring investors—Bagehot, Fisher, and Smith—all see it as a resilient, high-quality business with strong potential for sustained growth, with Bagehot even emphasizing its liquidity advantage. Meanwhile, Lynch and Housel acknowledge its merits but temper enthusiasm, noting that the stock’s price may already reflect its growth prospects. On the other end, Graham (both Defensive and Enterprising) and Marks (Market Cycle) dismiss it outright, with Graham calling it statistically overpriced and Marks warning of late-cycle risks. The contrast highlights a tension between growth-oriented, quality-focused investors and those wary of inflated expectations or market timing.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 83
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 80
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 75
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 72
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 72
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 57
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 56
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 40
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 31
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 24
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 12
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 1
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 2 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-13.4%
Net Margin
-9.0%
EBITDA Margin
-11.6%
ROE
-12.2%
ROA
-8.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.52
Cash
$1.08B
Total Debt
$80.32M
Current Ratio
3.39
Debt/Equity
0.05
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$369.39
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$27.65
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-92.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $136.39M | $125.13M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $162.82M | $137.04M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $185.20M | $143.01M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $200.25M | $141.86M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $205.26M | $133.40M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$109.11M
Terminal Value
$3.24B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.10B
Enterprise Value
$2.78B
Net Debt
$-995.82M
Equity Value
$3.78B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$12.52
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$8.76
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Investor's Business Daily · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
StockStory · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Business Wire · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Natera, Inc. (NTRA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NTRA currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NTRA's estimated fair value is $27.65, which is 92.5% below the current price of $369.39. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NTRA's technical score is 85/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 35.9%; Free cash flow growth: 57.6%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $27.65 vs. price $369.39 (-92.5%); Operating margin: -13.4% (negative); Net margin: -9.0% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for NTRA.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rabinowitz Matthew | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 17,933 | -17,933 | $327.97 |
| Rabinowitz Matthew | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 1,300 | -1,300 | $329.62 |
| Rabinowitz Matthew | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 15,764 | -15,764 | $328.95 |
| Rabinowitz Matthew | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 10,556 | -10,556 | $327.14 |
| Rabinowitz Matthew | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 3,647 | -3,647 | $326.11 |
| Rabinowitz Matthew | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 800 | -800 | $325.01 |
| Moshkevich Solomon | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 15,160 | -15,160 | $326.89 |
| Chapman Steven Leonard | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 1,698 | -1,698 | $320.99 |
| Moshkevich Solomon | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 1,400 | -1,400 | $320.92 |
| Moshkevich Solomon | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $319.76 |
| Moshkevich Solomon | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 600 | -600 | $321.91 |
| Fesko John | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 6,517 | -6,517 | $321.53 |
| Fesko John | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 197,257 | -6,517 | $321.53 |
| Sheena Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $325.32 |
| Sheena Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 230,464 | -6,000 | $325.32 |
| Sheena Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 400 | -400 | $310.23 |
| Sheena Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 100 | -100 | $318.63 |
| Sheena Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 900 | -900 | $313.07 |
| Sheena Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 600 | -600 | $315.32 |
| Sheena Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 100 | -100 | $308.40 |
| Sheena Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 850 | -850 | $314.25 |
| Sheena Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 400 | -400 | $311.88 |
| Rabinowitz Matthew | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $320.90 |
| Sheena Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 200 | -200 | $317.97 |
| Sheena Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 489 | -489 | $320.90 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,514,178 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,365,205 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology