Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$69.80
▼ $0.17 (-0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/19 09:44 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$18.89B
Day Range
$68.71 - $70.29
52-Week Range
$34.01 - $78.45
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
Support
$52.31
Resistance
$74.42
NTNX is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-10.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 20/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 695.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Death Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed below SMA 200
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
67
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
70
$66.44
Now
67
$69.80
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
76
Quality
58
Value
60
Momentum
57
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
71
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Nutanix, Inc. has centered on its industry recognition and competitive positioning. The company was reaffirmed in the **2026 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Container Management** for the second year in a row, highlighting its leadership in that space. Additionally, headlines emphasize **growing rivalry with Broadcom’s VMware** and Microsoft in hybrid cloud and AI-driven enterprise solutions, as VMware’s latest updates aim to challenge Nutanix’s market share. Stock comparisons and analyst discussions also briefly touched on Nutanix’s valuation relative to competitors.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Nutanix, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
39
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
43
Fundamentals
71
Technical
57
Valuation
60
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+49%
Market Narrative
57
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+16
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests **euphoria** is the dominant psychological state, driven by strong momentum (+4.0% ROC), extreme valuation (+35.4% above 200-day average), and positive sentiment (74/100). The disconnect between price (+4.0%) and fundamental growth (+2.3% EPS) hints at overconfidence, while FOMO remains secondary due to neutral RSI (61) and modest volume (0.75x average). The key open question is whether this valuation gap will persist or if reality (41) will eventually close the narrative gap (46).
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:52 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Nutanix Recognized in 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Container Management for Second Consecutive Year"
"AVGO's VMware AI push gains traction with VCF 9.1, while NTNX and MSFT intensify competition across enterprise AI and hybrid cloud."
"CEO highlights external storage and cloud solutions amid supply constraints."
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast between Peter Lynch’s near-perfect score (91) and the rest of the methodologies highlights a fundamental divide in how these investors evaluate growth potential. Lynch’s model sees NTNX as a compelling growth candidate where the stock price hasn’t yet reflected its underlying expansion, while most others—like Fisher (66), Veblen (65), and even Bagehot (63)—caution that the stock lacks the exceptional quality, liquidity, or clear trend they prioritize. Meanwhile, the lower-scoring approaches, from Marks’ late-cycle warning (33) to Schwager’s neutral stance (46), suggest a broader consensus that NTNX may be overvalued or lacks the structural advantages needed for a high-conviction hold. The only outliers, like Mackay (50) and Graham’s enterprising bar (50), hint at speculative excitement or marginal discounts, but none match Lynch’s aggressive growth thesis.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 87
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 87
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 86
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 65
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 63
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 61
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 54
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 52
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 51
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 36
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 8
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (7 bullish · 5 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
86.8%
Operating Margin
9.6%
Net Margin
52.8%
EBITDA Margin
12.1%
ROE
214.5%
ROA
29.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.61
Cash
$777.31M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.80
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$69.80
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$60,150.77
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
15.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.3% | $969.28M | $889.24M |
| 2 | 12.1% | $1.09B | $914.52M |
| 3 | 8.9% | $1.18B | $913.67M |
| 4 | 5.7% | $1.25B | $886.00M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.28B | $833.17M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$840.67M
Terminal Value
$20.22B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$13.14B
Enterprise Value
$17.58B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$17.58B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$2,404.54
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1,764.28
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
MarketBeat · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 8.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.9.2026
Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 67/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NTNX currently scores 67/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
NTNX's technical score is 57/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 695.4%; Net income growth: 700.0%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed below SMA 200; Calmar: 0.47 (3y annualized return 27.6% / max drawdown 58.6%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for NTNX.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maner Tarkan | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 7,365 | +7,365 | — |
| Sivaraman Rukmini | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 13,152 | +13,152 | — |
| RAMASWAMI RAJIV | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 338,868 | +338,868 | — |
| Martin Brian | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 15,124 | +15,124 | — |
| RAMASWAMI RAJIV | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 45,372 | +45,372 | — |
| Sivaraman Rukmini | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 101,660 | +101,660 | — |
| Maner Tarkan | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 56,476 | +56,476 | — |
| Martin Brian | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 7,365 | +7,365 | — |
| RAMASWAMI RAJIV | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 34,194 | +34,194 | — |
| Sivaraman Rukmini | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 15,880 | +15,880 | — |
| Maner Tarkan | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 9,075 | +9,075 | — |
| Maner Tarkan | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 118,620 | +56,476 | — |
| RAMASWAMI RAJIV | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 1,016,864 | +34,194 | — |
| Maner Tarkan | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 127,695 | +9,075 | — |
| Sivaraman Rukmini | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 421,584 | +13,152 | — |
| Sivaraman Rukmini | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 408,432 | +15,880 | — |
| Sivaraman Rukmini | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 392,552 | +101,660 | — |
| Martin Brian | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 29,154 | +15,124 | — |
| Martin Brian | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 36,519 | +7,365 | — |
| RAMASWAMI RAJIV | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 982,670 | +45,372 | — |
| RAMASWAMI RAJIV | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 937,298 | +338,868 | — |
| Maner Tarkan | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.8.2026 | 135,060 | +7,365 | — |
| Martin Brian | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.6.2026 | 2,825 | -2,825 | — |
| Martin Brian | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 15.6.2026 | 1,902 | -1,902 | — |
| Martin Brian | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.6.2026 | 1,697 | -1,697 | $49.40 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
11,590,255 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 15,061,103 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology