Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$139.80
▲ $2.04 (+1.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 08:41 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$4.98B
Day Range
$137.00 - $140.49
52-Week Range
$118.51 - $163.34
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.09.2026
Support
$129.01
Resistance
$160.49
MTN is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-7.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 23.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.63
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
55
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
55
Risk
28
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
54
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Vail Resorts, Inc. has focused on two key developments: the company’s upcoming **fiscal 2026 fourth-quarter earnings release and conference call** (scheduled for September 28), signaling investor interest in its financial performance. Additionally, the company announced that **board member Sue Decker will step down after eleven years**, citing increased board commitments elsewhere. No other substantive industry or operational updates were prominently featured in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Vail Resorts, Inc.. News trend score: 56. Reason: 5 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
30
Fundamentals
54
Technical
55
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+13
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (score 81) reflects traders’ fixation on the 0.9% support level, likely due to its proximity. While panic selling (31) hints at cautious sentiment, the lack of extreme volatility or volume spikes suggests hesitation rather than panic. The narrative gap (-7) implies a slight disconnect between market perception and fundamentals, but no clear bias like overconfidence or herding is active. The key question remains whether traders will hold near support or break below it, given the minimal FOMO or euphoria signals.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:50 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Sue Decker will transition off of Board after Eleven Years of Service"
"Vail Resorts (MTN) has drawn investor attention after recent share price weakness, with the stock down about 3% over the past day and about 11% over the past month"
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Thorstein Veblen — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 1/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Veblen's documented principles, the model estimates that MTN's growth aligns with real value creation, and Mackay’s assessment likewise finds no crowd mania, leading to a relatively positive view. Mid‑range scores from Lynch, Nelson, Schwager, Smith, Marks‑cycle and the efficient‑market perspective reflect mixed or neutral opinions, indicating that growth exists but is largely priced in or that the stock sits in the middle of a cycle. In contrast, Fisher, Livermore, Marks, Loeb, Graham and the others assign low scores, flagging concerns about quality, trend, risk and valuation that would deter them. The wide spread from 89 down to 1 therefore illustrates how growth‑oriented frameworks tend to favor the stock while value‑ and risk‑focused methodologies see it as unattractive.
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 89
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 88
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 61
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 53
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 49
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 47
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 39
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 38
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 20
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 14
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 13
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 3
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 1
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
44.4%
Operating Margin
18.9%
Net Margin
9.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
66.0%
ROA
4.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.54
Cash
$440.29M
Total Debt
$3.19B
Current Ratio
0.63
Debt/Equity
7.52
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 25.6.2026 | $2.220 |
| 24.6.2026 | $2.220 |
| 26.3.2026 | $2.220 |
| 25.3.2026 | $2.220 |
| 30.12.2025 | $2.220 |
| 29.12.2025 | $2.220 |
| 9.10.2025 | $2.220 |
| 8.10.2025 | $2.220 |
| 24.6.2025 | $2.220 |
| 23.6.2025 | $2.220 |
| 27.3.2025 | $2.220 |
| 26.3.2025 | $2.220 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$11.83
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$3.51
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 11 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
CNW Group · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 55/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MTN currently scores 55/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
MTN's technical score is 55/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 23.6%; Net income growth: 21.2%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.63; Calmar: -0.34 (3y annualized return -17.9% / max drawdown 52.9%); Debt/equity: 7.52.
Yes — MTN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 4 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HORNBUCKLE WILLIAM | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 249 | +249 | — |
| HORNBUCKLE WILLIAM | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 249 | +249 | — |
| KATZ ROBERT A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.6.2026 | 589 | -589 | $134.40 |
| KATZ ROBERT A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 2,048 | -2,048 | — |
| KATZ ROBERT A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 2,048 | +2,048 | — |
| KATZ ROBERT A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 287,360 | +2,048 | — |
| KATZ ROBERT A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.6.2026 | 286,771 | -589 | $134.40 |
| KATZ ROBERT A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.6.2026 | 4,096 | -2,048 | — |
| DeCecco Julie A. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 73 | -73 | — |
| DeCecco Julie A. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 73 | +73 | — |
| DeCecco Julie A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 21 | -21 | $125.86 |
| DeCecco Julie A. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 1,797 | +73 | — |
| DeCecco Julie A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 1,776 | -21 | $125.86 |
| DeCecco Julie A. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 73 | -73 | — |
| KATZ ROBERT A | Open Market Purchase | 16.3.2026 | 37,500 | +37,500 | $131.81 |
| Korch Angela A | Open Market Purchase | 16.3.2026 | 190 | +190 | $131.85 |
| Korch Angela A | Open Market Purchase | 16.3.2026 | 5,539 | +190 | $131.85 |
| KATZ ROBERT A | Open Market Purchase | 16.3.2026 | 285,312 | +37,500 | $131.81 |
| BURGOYNE CELESTE | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.2.2026 | 9,875 | +9,875 | — |
| BURGOYNE CELESTE | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.2.2026 | 38,665 | +38,665 | — |
| Korch Angela A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.2.2026 | 235 | -235 | $133.07 |
| BURGOYNE CELESTE | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.2.2026 | 17,281 | +17,281 | — |
| Korch Angela A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.2.2026 | 473 | +473 | — |
| Korch Angela A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.2.2026 | 202 | -202 | $133.07 |
| Korch Angela A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.2.2026 | 408 | +408 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,754,554 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,835,016 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
78.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 68.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology