Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$252.08
▲ $11.85 (+4.9%)
Market data updated: 09/19 03:22 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$17.05B
Day Range
$243.00 - $252.38
52-Week Range
$119.62 - $447.62
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$228.46
Resistance
$374.12
MKSI is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+94.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 55.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $62.79 vs. price $252.08 (-75.1%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (76/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
76
Quality
42
Value
33
Momentum
33
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
60
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **MKS Inc.** (MKSI) has centered on its stock performance and analyst sentiment following its earnings report. The company’s shares have declined **14.3%** since the last earnings release, prompting comparisons with rival stocks for valuation. However, earnings estimates have been revised upward, with analysts predicting a potential **49.8% stock surge** based on price targets. Additionally, the CEO sold **10,000 shares** for **$3 million**, though he retains a substantial stake. The focus remains on earnings momentum and investor speculation.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about MKS Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
30
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
70
Fundamentals
60
Technical
33
Valuation
33
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-38%
Market Narrative
76
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+40
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
MKSI’s dominant **Overconfidence** (45) reflects a disconnect between weak technical momentum and extreme valuation (+323% above DCF), consistent with investors ignoring lagging price performance. The **Euphoria** (33) and **Loss Aversion** (34) scores further suggest a narrative-reality gap (29), where positive sentiment (86/100) overshadows fundamental and technical weakness. The key tension lies between traders clinging to upside potential despite clear valuation mispricing and the potential for corrective volume if momentum fails to recover. The absence of herding or panic signals stability, but the narrative gap raises the risk of abrupt re-evaluation if fundamentals or sentiment diverge further.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:46 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"The average of price targets set by Wall Street analysts indicates a potential upside of 49.8%"
"MKS (MKSI) shares have started gaining and might continue moving higher in the near term, as indicated by solid earnings estimate revisions"
"Mizuho analyst lowers price target from $360 to $330 while maintaining Outperform rating"
"MKS CEO John Tseng-Chung Lee sells 10,000 shares for $3 million"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jack Schwager — 73/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for MKSI reflects deep philosophical and tactical differences among the methodologies. Schwager, Marks (Market Cycle), and Nelson—all scoring in the high 70s—see this stock as part of a favorable cycle or trend, with a disciplined risk/reward dynamic that aligns with their principles of identifying early-to-mid-cycle opportunities or oversold conditions. In contrast, Graham (both Defensive and Enterprising Investor) and Livermore, scoring in the teens and low 20s, dismiss it outright: Graham’s strict valuation and margin-of-safety criteria are violated, while Livermore’s insistence on trading *with* the trend is flatly contradicted by the stock’s apparent downtrend. Meanwhile, Fisher and Loeb—scoring 38 and 32—highlight either a lack of qualitative growth or excessive risk, while Bogle and Malkiel’s efficient-market skepticism (score 47) suggests the stock’s idiosyncratic appeal isn’t strong enough to justify active selection over passive indexing.
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 73
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 64
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 60
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 58
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 53
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 47
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 46
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 41
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 32
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 31
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 15
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
46.7%
Operating Margin
13.4%
Net Margin
7.5%
EBITDA Margin
22.2%
ROE
10.8%
ROA
3.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.39
Cash
$418.00M
Total Debt
$4.20B
Current Ratio
2.71
Debt/Equity
1.55
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 25.8.2026 | $0.250 |
| 3.6.2026 | $0.250 |
| 2.6.2026 | $0.250 |
| 23.2.2026 | $0.250 |
| 22.2.2026 | $0.250 |
| 24.11.2025 | $0.220 |
| 23.11.2025 | $0.220 |
| 25.8.2025 | $0.220 |
| 24.8.2025 | $0.220 |
| 27.5.2025 | $0.220 |
| 26.5.2025 | $0.220 |
| 24.2.2025 | $0.220 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$252.08
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$62.79
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-75.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
3.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.6% | $514.79M | $472.29M |
| 2 | 3.3% | $531.84M | $447.64M |
| 3 | 3.0% | $548.01M | $423.16M |
| 4 | 2.8% | $563.19M | $398.97M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $577.27M | $375.18M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$497.00M
Terminal Value
$9.10B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.92B
Enterprise Value
$8.03B
Net Debt
$3.78B
Equity Value
$4.25B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$40.16
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$29.47
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Motley Fool · 25.8.2026
MT Newswires · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 24.8.2026
MKS Inc. (MKSI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MKSI currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, MKSI's estimated fair value is $62.79, which is 75.1% below the current price of $252.08. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
MKSI's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 55.5%; Free cash flow growth: 21.2%; Net income growth: 55.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $62.79 vs. price $252.08 (-75.1%); Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 5.6% of price.
Yes — MKSI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 24 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mora Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 300 | -300 | $250.96 |
| Donlan Renee Martel | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 954.044 | +954.044 | — |
| Lee John Tseng-Chung | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $302.01 |
| Williams John Edward | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 457 | -457 | $288.31 |
| Williams John Edward | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 4,098 | -457 | $288.31 |
| Schreiner James Alan | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 812 | -812 | $346.41 |
| Schreiner James Alan | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 217 | -217 | $347.00 |
| Schreiner James Alan | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 2,471 | -2,471 | $345.52 |
| Schreiner James Alan | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 20,230 | -2,471 | $345.52 |
| Schreiner James Alan | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 19,418 | -812 | $346.41 |
| Schreiner James Alan | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 19,201 | -217 | $347.00 |
| Schreiner James Alan | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 781 | -781 | $317.42 |
| Schreiner James Alan | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 22,701 | -781 | $317.42 |
| McCarthy Michelle M | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 2,434 | -2,434 | $315.23 |
| McCarthy Michelle M | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 2 | -2,434 | $315.23 |
| Henry David Philip | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $314.43 |
| Mora Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 300 | -300 | $318.02 |
| Mora Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 19,145 | -300 | $318.02 |
| Henry David Philip | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 10,422 | -6,000 | $314.43 |
| COLELLA GERALD G | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 1,811 | -1,811 | $335.46 |
| COLELLA GERALD G | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 213 | -213 | $337.05 |
| COLELLA GERALD G | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 1,626 | -1,626 | $336.54 |
| COLELLA GERALD G | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 8,210 | -8,210 | $331.45 |
| COLELLA GERALD G | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 2,800 | -2,800 | $338.58 |
| COLELLA GERALD G | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 4,876 | -4,876 | $332.04 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,252,633 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,751,932 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
38.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 49.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology