Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$383.56
▼ $9.86 (-2.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 06:55 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$30.90B
Day Range
$381.48 - $397.39
52-Week Range
$215.68 - $473.10
Beta
—
Next Earnings
30.11.2026
Support
$291.79
Resistance
$473.10
MDB is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+21.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 22.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $155.09 vs. price $383.56 (-59.6%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (82/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
17d ago · $383.44
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 2 to 34 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
48
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
30
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of MongoDB highlights its strategic shifts amid evolving enterprise technology trends. The company’s Q2 2027 earnings call drew attention, while financial analysts like Macquarie raised its price target, signaling cautious optimism. Performance benchmarks, such as MongoDB’s partnership with Icon Solutions demonstrating high-speed payment processing, underscored its technical capabilities. Additionally, the company’s focus on AI expansion—evident in the appointment of Richard Scott to lead Asia Pacific and Japan—reflects efforts to accelerate AI adoption and regional growth. However, broader market shifts toward hardware investments due to rising AI token costs have weighed on its stock performance.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about MongoDB, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
35
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
30
Technical
48
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+15%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+24
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests traders are torn between overconfidence in a historically overvalued stock and cautious FOMO or panic-driven selling. The narrative-reality gap (11-point divergence) implies investors may be overestimating tailwinds relative to fundamentals. Key open questions include whether the extreme valuation will persist or if momentum shifts could trigger a re-evaluation. The dominant overconfidence may persist unless price momentum aligns with earnings growth or sentiment shifts sharply.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:45 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"MongoDB has appointed Richard Scott as Senior Vice President for Asia Pacific and Japan to lead its regional business and AI-focused initiatives."
"Rising AI token costs are pushing enterprises toward on-premises hardware, boosting Dell Technologies after strong earnings while MongoDB shares fell despite a beat."
"Jim Cramer explains why SanDisk (SNDK) makes MongoDB (MDB) look expensive."
"Icon Solutions and MongoDB Benchmark Shows IPF Processing 6,000 Payments per Second with Zero Data Loss Under Failure."
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 91/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 23/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with top-tier investors like Samuel Armstrong Nelson (95) and Peter Lynch (91) seeing it as a high-potential opportunity—Nelson flags it as oversold with favorable cycle positioning, while Lynch spots untapped growth potential. Meanwhile, disciplined traders like Jack Schwager (78) and Walter Bagehot (73) still view it as a solid, low-risk setup, though not as aggressively as the growth-focused strategists. At the other end, defensive investors like Benjamin Graham (25) and Howard Marks (36) dismiss it outright, citing excessive risk or valuation concerns, while efficient-market proponents (47) question whether active selection adds meaningful value. The contrast highlights a clear split: growth-oriented and cyclical analysts lean bullish, while value and risk-averse frameworks remain skeptical.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 91
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 73
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 73
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 72
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 52
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 32
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 26
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 25
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 23
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
71.7%
Operating Margin
-5.6%
Net Margin
-2.9%
EBITDA Margin
-4.7%
ROE
-2.4%
ROA
-1.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.88
Cash
$1.08B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
4.65
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$383.56
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$155.09
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-59.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
24.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24.4% | $622.04M | $570.68M |
| 2 | 18.9% | $739.58M | $622.49M |
| 3 | 13.4% | $838.91M | $647.79M |
| 4 | 8.0% | $905.73M | $641.64M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $928.37M | $603.38M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$500.19M
Terminal Value
$14.64B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$9.51B
Enterprise Value
$12.60B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$12.60B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$36.34
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$33.56
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 4 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
MarketBeat · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
MarketBeat · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
MarketBeat · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
StockStory · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
PR Newswire · 11.9.2026
MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MDB currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, MDB's estimated fair value is $155.09, which is 59.6% below the current price of $383.56. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
MDB's technical score is 48/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 22.8%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 49.1%; Free cash flow growth: 314.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $155.09 vs. price $383.56 (-59.6%); Operating margin: -5.6% (negative); Net margin: -2.9% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for MDB.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 522 | -522 | $451.22 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,652 | -1,652 | $450.28 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 2,174 | -2,174 | $453.71 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 80 | -80 | $454.88 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 120 | -120 | $456.36 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 460 | -460 | $452.55 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 992 | -992 | $448.98 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 3,248 | -3,248 | $472.22 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 6,752 | -6,752 | $469.81 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 2,774 | -2,774 | $333.42 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 835 | -835 | $324.12 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 867 | -867 | $325.48 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 81 | -81 | $328.30 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 80 | -80 | $329.54 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 1,363 | -1,363 | $327.70 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 464,061 | -835 | $324.12 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 463,194 | -867 | $325.48 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 461,831 | -1,363 | $327.70 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 461,750 | -81 | $328.30 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 461,670 | -80 | $329.54 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 458,896 | -2,774 | $333.42 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 2,480 | -2,480 | $316.52 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $324.05 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 2,120 | -2,120 | $321.78 |
| MERRIMAN DWIGHT A | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 680 | -680 | $320.65 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,946,402 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,598,807 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology