Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$47.46
▼ $0.20 (-0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 10:36 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$8.91B
Day Range
$46.85 - $48.55
52-Week Range
$43.09 - $134.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$43.09
Resistance
$67.10
KTOS is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-41.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Net income growth
Net income growth: 35.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
51
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
47
Value
45
Momentum
24
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
51
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.** (KTOS) has focused on its stock performance, financial challenges, and industry dynamics. The company’s shares have declined **13.7% since its last earnings report**, raising investor concerns despite its role in the drone sector. While a **new 100% tariff on drones** was expected to boost domestic producers like Kratos, the stock has instead **tanked**, contradicting analyst optimism. The broader defense drone market remains volatile, with valuation and execution risks overshadowing near-term growth potential.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 17 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
47
Fundamentals
51
Technical
24
Valuation
45
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-12%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+23
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
KTOS’s psychology profile is fragmented, with no single dominant state but notable **loss aversion** (score: 24) and **euphoria** (score: 19) as outliers. The extreme positive sentiment (98/100) contrasts sharply with weak technicals (negative ROC, below 200MA), suggesting investors may be holding despite losses, possibly to avoid realizing them. The narrative gap (15 points) hints at a disconnect between market enthusiasm and fundamentals. The key question: *Is the elevated volume driven by profit-taking or defensive positioning?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:36 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"We view the move as positive for domestic producers... AeroVironment, Teledyne Technologies, Redwire, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions and Elbit Systems could benefit."
"Kratos (KTOS) Down 13.7% Since Last Earnings Report: Can It Rebound?"
"Redwire enters the second half with record backlog... but cash burn and a premium valuation demand execution."
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 84/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 18/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The scores for KTOS span a wide range—from Nelson’s strong 96 indicating a favorable cycle position to Livermore’s 15 flagging a negative trend—showing how the underlying principles of each methodology diverge. Based on his documented principles, the model estimates that investors like Nelson, Mackay, Bagehot and Marks (cycle) view the stock positively, highlighting oversold conditions, lack of crowd mania, solid liquidity and an early‑mid cycle footing. Mid‑range scores from Marks (enterprising), Schwager, Smith and Loeb suggest the risk appears reasonably priced but without a clear edge, leading to a more cautious or neutral stance. Conversely, the lower scores from Veblen, Housel, the efficient‑market duo, Lynch, Graham, Fisher and Livermore reflect concerns about growth translating to profit, modest holdability, failure to meet growth‑at‑reasonable‑price or defensive criteria, and a negative price trend.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 84
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 82
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 61
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 61
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 41
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 40
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 36
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 18
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
22.9%
Operating Margin
1.9%
Net Margin
1.6%
EBITDA Margin
5.4%
ROE
1.1%
ROA
0.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.14
Cash
$560.60M
Total Debt
$0
Current Ratio
4.06
Debt/Equity
0.00
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$12.08
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$8.15
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 17 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 19.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
CNW Group · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 51/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
KTOS currently scores 51/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
KTOS's technical score is 24/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net income growth: 35.0%; Debt/equity: 0.00; Current ratio: 4.06.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 5.3% of price; Price is below the 50-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for KTOS.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fendley Steven S. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 288,111 | -7,000 | $56.16 |
| Fendley Steven S. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 7,000 | -7,000 | $56.16 |
| Jarvis Scot B | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $63.50 |
| Carrai Phillip D | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,200 | -1,200 | $64.18 |
| Carrai Phillip D | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 5,200 | -5,200 | $63.41 |
| Mendoza Marie | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,513 | -1,513 | $64.37 |
| Carrai Phillip D | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 20,000 | -20,000 | $63.14 |
| Carrai Phillip D | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 100 | -100 | $64.97 |
| DEMARCO ERIC M | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 1,041,994 | -19,638 | $63.33 |
| DEMARCO ERIC M | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 770,732 | -4,946 | $65.05 |
| DEMARCO ERIC M | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 775,678 | -266,316 | $64.33 |
| DEMARCO ERIC M | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 761,632 | -9,100 | $66.17 |
| DEMARCO ERIC M | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 9,100 | -9,100 | $66.17 |
| DEMARCO ERIC M | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 266,316 | -266,316 | $64.33 |
| DEMARCO ERIC M | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 4,946 | -4,946 | $65.05 |
| DEMARCO ERIC M | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 19,638 | -19,638 | $63.33 |
| Carter David M | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 62,637 | -1,500 | $56.21 |
| Carter David M | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 62,237 | -100 | $58.94 |
| Carter David M | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 64,137 | -2,100 | $55.34 |
| Carter David M | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 62,337 | -300 | $57.24 |
| Carter David M | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $56.21 |
| Carter David M | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 100 | -100 | $58.94 |
| Carter David M | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 2,100 | -2,100 | $55.34 |
| Carter David M | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 300 | -300 | $57.24 |
| Lund Deanna H | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 3,200 | -3,200 | $48.95 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
9,729,860 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 9,549,755 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
47.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology