Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$50.83
▲ $0.96 (+1.9%)
Market data updated: 09/21 06:43 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$1.01B
Day Range
$49.25 - $51.00
52-Week Range
$20.61 - $51.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$34.10
Resistance
$50.81
KRT is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+106.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 18/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Return on equity (ROE)
Return on equity (ROE): 21.1% — strong
Fundamental
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $27.72 vs. price $50.83 (-45.5%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
64
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
53
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
82
Risk
62
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
69
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Karat Packaging Inc.** has highlighted its strong stock performance, with a **91.9% surge in six months**, driven by solid quarterly results and positive investor sentiment. Analysts have noted its high dividend yield and cash-generating potential, positioning it as a momentum stock amid market turbulence. The company is also preparing to present at the **Lake Street Capital’s BIG10 Conference** in September, where leadership will engage with investors. Overall, themes include growth potential, financial strength, and upcoming investor interactions.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Karat Packaging Inc.. News trend score: 86. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
53
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
62
Fundamentals
69
Technical
82
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+67%
Market Narrative
77
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+40
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
KRT’s psychology is dominated by **euphoria**, where extreme valuation (+74% above DCF) and perfect sentiment align with detached price momentum. Overconfidence is also high, as price gains outstrip fundamental growth, suggesting traders may be ignoring earnings stagnation. The **narrative-reality gap (42 points)** widens this disconnect, as optimism far exceeds measurable fundamentals. The key question: *Will traders sustain this valuation premium despite no EPS growth?* Herding remains muted, as KRT underperformed peers, hinting at selective participation rather than blind following.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 09:04 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"The company’s stock price has jumped 91.9%, hitting $47.39 per share."
"Wall Street's Most Accurate Analysts Give Their Take On 3 Industrials Stocks Delivering High-Dividend Yields"
"Businesses with strong free cash flow tend to be more adaptable and resilient."
"Management will conduct one-on-one meetings with investors during the conference."
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 72/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 11/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with scores ranging from a strong 72 under Edgar Lawrence Smith’s ‘buy and hold for a decade’ framework—suggesting long-term fundamentals align with his patient, secular-growth philosophy—to a resounding 20 under Philip Fisher, who dismisses it for lacking the quality and growth traits he prized. Meanwhile, the middle ground is fractured: Walter Bagehot and Gerald Loeb see it as adequate but not exceptional, while Jesse Livermore’s 59 signals a lack of clear trend, leaving him indifferent. The efficient-market camp (Malkiel/Bogle) and mid-cycle analysts (Nelson, Schwager) are lukewarm, while the more conservative voices—Graham, Marks, and Lynch—flag it as overvalued, risky, or inconsistent with their core principles. The contrast highlights a tension between growth-potential optimists (Smith) and those wary of volatility or valuation (Fisher, Graham), with even the ‘neutral’ methodologies split on whether the stock’s signals are noise or worth further scrutiny.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 72
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 69
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 68
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 59
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 43
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 40
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 30
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 28
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 25
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 22
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 20
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 11
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 2 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
36.8%
Operating Margin
8.9%
Net Margin
6.7%
EBITDA Margin
11.2%
ROE
21.1%
ROA
10.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.57
Cash
$37.88M
Total Debt
$12.94M
Current Ratio
2.30
Debt/Equity
0.09
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 21.8.2026 | $0.470 |
| 21.5.2026 | $0.450 |
| 20.5.2026 | $0.450 |
| 20.2.2026 | $0.450 |
| 19.2.2026 | $0.450 |
| 21.11.2025 | $0.450 |
| 20.11.2025 | $0.450 |
| 20.8.2025 | $0.450 |
| 19.8.2025 | $0.450 |
| 16.5.2025 | $0.450 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.450 |
| 24.2.2025 | $0.450 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$50.83
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$27.72
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-45.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
3.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.6% | $34.25M | $31.42M |
| 2 | 3.3% | $35.38M | $29.78M |
| 3 | 3.0% | $36.46M | $28.15M |
| 4 | 2.8% | $37.47M | $26.54M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $38.41M | $24.96M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$33.06M
Terminal Value
$605.64M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$393.62M
Enterprise Value
$534.48M
Net Debt
$-24.94M
Equity Value
$559.42M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$7.40
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.22
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 10 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
StockStory · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
StockStory · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 21.8.2026
StockStory · 21.8.2026
Yahoo · 19.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 19.8.2026
Yahoo · 18.8.2026
StockStory · 18.8.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
StockStory · 17.8.2026
Yahoo · 16.8.2026
StockStory · 16.8.2026
Yahoo · 14.8.2026
Motley Fool · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 64/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
KRT currently scores 64/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, KRT's estimated fair value is $27.72, which is 45.5% below the current price of $50.83. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
KRT's technical score is 82/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Return on equity (ROE): 21.1% — strong; Debt/equity: 0.09; Current ratio: 2.30.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $27.72 vs. price $50.83 (-45.5%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Free cash flow growth: -29.7%.
Yes — KRT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cheng Marvin | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $48.50 |
| Cheng Marvin | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 4,000 | -4,000 | $48.38 |
| Cheng Marvin | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $47.75 |
| Cheng Marvin | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 4,500 | -4,500 | $47.33 |
| Guo Jian | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 4,700 | -4,700 | — |
| Guo Jian | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 4,700 | +4,700 | $16.53 |
| Guo Jian | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 41,029 | +4,700 | $16.53 |
| Guo Jian | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 31,850 | -4,700 | — |
| Quire Daniel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 2,065 | -2,065 | $26.28 |
| Yu Alan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 2,124 | -2,124 | $26.28 |
| Guo Jian | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 2,733 | -2,733 | $26.28 |
| Quire Daniel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 23,631 | -2,065 | $26.28 |
| Yu Alan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 6,097,181 | -2,124 | $26.28 |
| Guo Jian | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 36,329 | -2,733 | $26.28 |
| Yu Alan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.5.2026 | 8,000 | -8,000 | — |
| Yu Alan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.5.2026 | 8,000 | +8,000 | — |
| Quire Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.5.2026 | 8,000 | -8,000 | — |
| Quire Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.5.2026 | 8,000 | +8,000 | — |
| Guo Jian | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.5.2026 | 8,000 | -8,000 | — |
| Guo Jian | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.5.2026 | 8,000 | +8,000 | — |
| Yu Alan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.5.2026 | 6,099,305 | +8,000 | — |
| Yu Alan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.5.2026 | 0 | -8,000 | — |
| Quire Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.5.2026 | 25,696 | +8,000 | — |
| Quire Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.5.2026 | 0 | -8,000 | — |
| Guo Jian | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.5.2026 | 39,062 | +8,000 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
313,251 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 260,922 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
71.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 57.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology