Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$9.50
▲ $0.31 (+3.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:29 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$47.24M
Day Range
$8.96 - $9.50
52-Week Range
$5.30 - $19.68
Beta
—
Next Earnings
10.11.2026
Support
$5.30
Resistance
$9.59
KPLT is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-53.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 98.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$46.17 vs. price $9.50 (-586.0%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (79/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
11d ago · $8.91
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 71)
What happened after
14d ago · $7.90
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 14 to 56 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
85
Risk
26
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
24
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Katapult Holdings, Inc. has centered on its strategic expansion through the pending merger with Aaron’s and CCF Holdings, forming a $4 billion nonprime financial platform. The company also reported mixed Q2 2026 results, with revenue meeting expectations but a higher-than-anticipated per-share loss, alongside modest year-over-year origination growth. Analysts and investors are closely watching the upcoming business combination and its long-term financial impact.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Katapult Holdings, Inc.. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 1 vs. 1 out of the last 8 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
67
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Investors appear highly excited (67), but evidence of strong fundamental conviction is comparatively weak (36).
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
24
Technical
85
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+51%
Market Narrative
68
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+32
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant overconfidence—driven by price momentum vastly exceeding fundamentals—suggests investors are ignoring EPS growth. FOMO (62) and euphoria (71) align with this, as momentum and RSI indicate speculative excitement. The narrative gap (29) further implies a disconnect between price action and reality. The key question: will traders sustain this disconnect or pivot when fundamentals fail to justify the rally?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:08 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""Aaron's merger expected Aug 2026""
""Katapult Holdings Q2 mixed: revenue meets, per-share loss misses""
""Creating a scaled financial solutions platform for nonprime consumers""
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides methodologies sharply, with some legendary investors seeing strong potential while others flag severe risks. Peter Lynch and Jesse Livermore both rate it as a high-probability growth play—Lynch sees the price lagging behind earnings growth, while Livermore approves of the upward momentum. Meanwhile, Fisher and the efficient-market camp are lukewarm: Fisher dismisses it as merely solid rather than exceptional, and Malkiel/Bogle question whether active selection adds value over passive indexing. At the other extreme, Graham (both traditional and Enterprising) and Nelson reject it outright—Graham lacks sufficient valuation data, while Nelson warns of overbought conditions. The divide suggests a stock that excites growth-focused traders but alarms fundamentalists and cycle-sensitive investors.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 89
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 73
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 66
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 53
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 47
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 35
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 29
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 13
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 12
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 9
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 7
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 15%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 2 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
17.7%
Operating Margin
-0.2%
Net Margin
0.5%
EBITDA Margin
56.1%
ROE
-3.6%
ROA
1.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.11
Cash
$22.43M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
0.89
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$9.50
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$46.17
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-586.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
11.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.8% | $-13.38M | $-12.27M |
| 2 | 9.5% | $-14.64M | $-12.33M |
| 3 | 7.1% | $-15.69M | $-12.12M |
| 4 | 4.8% | $-16.45M | $-11.65M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-16.86M | $-10.96M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-11.97M
Terminal Value
$-265.82M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-172.77M
Enterprise Value
$-232.08M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-232.08M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$7.58
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$7.92
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 1 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 8 articles.
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
InvestorsHub · 11.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 11.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 4.8.2026
ChartMill · 4.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 3.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 21.7.2026
Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
KPLT currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, KPLT's estimated fair value is -$46.17, which is 586.0% below the current price of $9.50. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
KPLT's technical score is 85/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 98.2%; Free cash flow growth: 63.3%; Net income growth: 105.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$46.17 vs. price $9.50 (-586.0%); Operating margin: -0.2% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for KPLT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zayas Orlando | Disposition to the Company | 11.8.2026 | 20,468 | -20,468 | — |
| DeVault Lynn | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 203,202 | +203,202 | — |
| Falkenstein Russell | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 224,100 | +224,100 | — |
| Miller Cory J | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 268,920 | +268,920 | — |
| Hanson Kyle | Other Transaction | 11.8.2026 | 900,308 | +900,308 | — |
| Zayas Orlando | Tax Withholding in Shares | 11.8.2026 | 2,608 | -2,608 | $8.00 |
| Heller Michael MH | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 596,320 | +596,320 | — |
| BAKER WILLIAM C | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 1,268,047 | +1,268,047 | — |
| IQV Holdco, LLC | Other Transaction | 11.8.2026 | 11,369,326 | -11,369,326 | — |
| Hanson Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 628,931 | +628,931 | — |
| Miller Cory J | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 511,006 | -511,006 | — |
| Baldock Jennifer A | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 596,320 | +596,320 | — |
| George Rachel G | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 314,465 | -314,465 | — |
| George Rachel G | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 179,280 | +179,280 | — |
| BAKER WILLIAM C | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 393,082 | -393,082 | — |
| Schutt Eugene R Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 594,320 | +594,320 | — |
| HHCF Series 21 Sub, LLC | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 612,985 | -612,985 | — |
| Falkenstein Russell | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 393,082 | -393,082 | — |
| Hanson Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 3,505,145 | +3,505,145 | — |
| BAKER WILLIAM C | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 1,268,047 | +1,268,047 | — |
| Schutt Eugene R Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 596,320 | +594,320 | — |
| BAKER WILLIAM C | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 393,082 | -393,082 | — |
| Baldock Jennifer A | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 596,320 | +596,320 | — |
| Hanson Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 3,505,145 | +3,505,145 | — |
| Hanson Kyle | Other Transaction | 11.8.2026 | 4,405,453 | +900,308 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
150,196 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 142,816 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
48.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology