Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$3.28
▼ $0.55 (-14.4%)
Market data updated: 09/19 08:43 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$658.03M
Day Range
$3.25 - $3.84
52-Week Range
$3.25 - $11.35
Beta
—
Next Earnings
10.11.2026
Support
$3.24
Resistance
$5.19
KDK is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-58.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Return on equity (ROE)
Return on equity (ROE): 206.9% — strong
Fundamental
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$16.77 vs. price $3.28 (-611.3%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
42
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
23
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
46
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Kodiak AI, Inc. highlights its progress in autonomous trucking technology, particularly its collaboration with AMD to integrate EPYC processors into its seventh-generation autonomous truck platform, emphasizing enhanced computing power and efficiency. Analysts, including Oppenheimer’s Colin Rusch, have expressed optimism about Kodiak’s potential as a long-term leader in the autonomous trucking sector, projecting a market value exceeding $160 billion by 2035. However, concerns remain about customer concentration and unproven demand, contributing to stock volatility.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Kodiak AI, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
21
Psychology
79
Fundamentals
46
Technical
23
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-46%
Market Narrative
57
Fundamental Reality
21
Narrative Gap
+36
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
KDK’s psychology is dominated by **loss aversion**, reflecting a prolonged drawdown (-31% in three months) and subdued trading activity. The narrative gap (+38) and deteriorating fundamentals (revenue/margin declines) may reinforce selective confirmation bias, where investors cherry-pick positive signals while ignoring broader weakness. Herding is present but muted, as the stock underperformed peers today (+1.8% vs. +3.3%). The key question: *Will the recent momentum (+4.6% ROC) sustain, or will profit-taking accelerate as loss-averse traders exit?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:33 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AMD EPYC™ processors deliver higher compute performance, faster processing speeds, lower power consumption, and improved efficiency for the Kodiak Driver"
"Oppenheimer analyst Colin Rusch initiates coverage on Kodiak AI with an Outperform rating and announces Price Target of $9"
"Analyst sees Kodiak AI as a potential long-term winner in autonomous trucking, a market projected to exceed $160 billion by 2035"
"Kodiak AI's DaaS model shows promise with Atlas, but customer concentration and unproven broader demand remain key risks"
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on each investor's documented principles, the model estimates that the defensive Graham and Bagehot frameworks award perfect scores, reflecting KDK's strong balance sheet and liquidity. The Enterprising Graham score is also perfect but notes insufficient valuation data, showing a similar endorsement limited by data constraints. Mid‑range scores from Nelson, Howard Marks (cycle), Mackay and Marks (risk) indicate a moderately favorable cycle position and reasonable expectations, though not overwhelmingly positive. In contrast, lower scores from Schwager, Loeb, Smith, Veblen, the efficient‑market view, Housel, Livermore, Lynch and Fisher highlight concerns such as lack of growth quality, volatility, negative trend and insufficient long‑term stability, leading to more skeptical conclusions. Consequently, value‑ and liquidity‑oriented methodologies converge on a positive view, while growth, trend‑following and market‑efficiency perspectives diverge toward caution.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 59
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 36
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 34
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 22
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 247 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-2966.2%
Net Margin
-15420.7%
EBITDA Margin
-2880.6%
ROE
206.9%
ROA
-367.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$6.42
Cash
$50.76M
Total Debt
$41.78M
Current Ratio
4.73
Debt/Equity
-0.15
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$3.28
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$16.77
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-611.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-110.64M | $-101.51M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-107.19M | $-90.22M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-105.85M | $-81.73M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-106.51M | $-75.45M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-109.17M | $-70.95M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-116.47M
Terminal Value
$-1.72B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-1.12B
Enterprise Value
$-1.54B
Net Debt
$-8.98M
Equity Value
$-1.53B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$3.10
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$3.10
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Trefis · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Trefis · 4.9.2026
MT Newswires · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Quartz · 25.8.2026
Kodiak AI, Inc. (KDK) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 42/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
KDK currently scores 42/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, KDK's estimated fair value is -$16.77, which is 611.3% below the current price of $3.28. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
KDK's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Return on equity (ROE): 206.9% — strong; Debt/equity: -0.15; Current ratio: 4.73.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$16.77 vs. price $3.28 (-611.3%); Operating margin: -2966.2% (negative); Net margin: -15420.7% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for KDK.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Datta Surajit | Disposition to the Company | 1.7.2026 | 2,035,915 | -2,035,915 | — |
| Wiesinger Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 417,362 | +417,362 | — |
| Datta Surajit | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 563,063 | +563,063 | — |
| Datta Surajit | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 417,362 | +417,362 | — |
| Major Zsuzsanna | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 200,333 | +200,333 | — |
| Burnette Donald L. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 1,168,614 | +1,168,614 | — |
| Wendel Andreas | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 434,056 | +434,056 | — |
| Coleman Jordan S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 292,153 | +292,153 | — |
| Burnette Donald L. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 27,083,818 | +1,168,614 | — |
| Wendel Andreas | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 4,739,629 | +434,056 | — |
| Datta Surajit | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 563,063 | +563,063 | — |
| Datta Surajit | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 980,425 | +417,362 | — |
| Datta Surajit | Disposition to the Company | 1.7.2026 | 0 | -2,035,915 | — |
| Wiesinger Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 596,102 | +417,362 | — |
| Coleman Jordan S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 296,624 | +292,153 | — |
| Major Zsuzsanna | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 210,333 | +200,333 | — |
| Elshenawy Mohamed | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 31,758 | +31,758 | — |
| GOLDMAN KENNETH A | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 31,758 | +31,758 | — |
| Reed James D | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 31,758 | +31,758 | — |
| TOBIN SCOTT R | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 31,758 | +31,758 | — |
| Sverchek Kristin | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 31,758 | +31,758 | — |
| TOBIN SCOTT R | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 31,758 | +31,758 | — |
| GOLDMAN KENNETH A | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 31,758 | +31,758 | — |
| Reed James D | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 31,758 | +31,758 | — |
| Sverchek Kristin | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.6.2026 | 31,758 | +31,758 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
8,930,670 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,309,199 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
73.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 74.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology