Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Telecommunications · ·
$46.77
▼ $0.71 (-1.5%)
Market data updated: 09/18 10:46 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$4.96B
Day Range
$46.57 - $47.50
52-Week Range
$15.65 - $57.18
Beta
—
Next Earnings
15.10.2026
Support
$44.21
Resistance
$51.39
+158.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $32.62 vs. price $46.77 (-30.2%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
61
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $47.48
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 55)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $47.03
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 55)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
53
Quality
58
Value
33
Momentum
68
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
64
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Iridium Communications Inc. has centered on its potential acquisition by Rocket Lab, with the Iridium CEO selling over 9,500 shares amid speculation. Investor attention has also focused on Iridium’s strong year-to-date stock performance (up 164%) and subsequent pullback, alongside debates over its valuation and cash flow. Rocket Lab’s new SDN contracts, expanding its military space communication role, indirectly highlight Iridium’s strategic relevance in satellite networks. Analysts weigh the deal’s impact on both companies’ futures.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Iridium Communications Inc. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
46
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
57
Fundamentals
64
Technical
68
Valuation
33
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+7%
Market Narrative
78
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+37
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
IRDM’s dominant overconfidence (42) stems from a disconnect between price (47% above DCF) and weak momentum, suggesting investors may overestimate growth potential despite lagging performance. The narrative gap (29) further implies optimism exceeds tangible evidence, while muted volume (0.68x avg) and neutral RSI (50) temper euphoria. The key question: is the premium justified by future catalysts, or will fundamentals reassert themselves? Low panic (2) and herding (0) suggest no immediate liquidity crisis, but overvaluation risks persist.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:13 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Rocket Lab Is Poised to Acquire the Company"
"share price return down 9.79% over 90 days"
"Furuno will offer its new SOLION-100 terminal for Iridium GMDSS"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 64/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with scores ranging from a cautious 64—where Walter Bagehot sees *adequate but not exceptional liquidity*—to a resounding 15, where Benjamin Graham’s defensive framework finds it failing core valuation and safety criteria. The middle-ground approaches, like Burton Malkiel and John Bogle’s efficient-market skepticism (59) or Charles Mackay’s warning of crowd-driven excitement (57), suggest the stock lacks clear alpha potential or fundamental justification, while Thorstein Veblen’s mixed growth signal (56) hints at potential mispricing without clear profitability. Meanwhile, the most bearish methodologies—from Philip Fisher’s dismissal (35) for lacking growth quality to Jack Schwager’s outright rejection (26) for lacking a disciplined setup—align on its failure to meet rigorous, rule-based standards. Even the more flexible frameworks, like Howard Marks’ risk-valuation caution (29) or Peter Lynch’s growth-at-a-reasonable-price test (25), flag it as volatile or unconvincing, leaving only a handful of methodologies (like Bagehot’s liquidity focus) offering any qualified endorsement.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 64
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 62
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 54
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 47
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 38
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 37
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 35
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 34
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 25
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 25
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 18
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 18
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 15
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 2 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$44.21
Range Bottom
$51.39
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
27.1%
Net Margin
13.1%
EBITDA Margin
51.2%
ROE
24.7%
ROA
4.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.07
Cash
$96.50M
Total Debt
$1.76B
Current Ratio
2.48
Debt/Equity
3.81
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.150 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.150 |
| 16.3.2026 | $0.150 |
| 15.3.2026 | $0.150 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.150 |
| 14.12.2025 | $0.150 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.150 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.150 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.140 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.140 |
| 17.3.2025 | $0.140 |
| 16.3.2025 | $0.140 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$46.77
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$32.62
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-30.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
6.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.6% | $319.43M | $293.06M |
| 2 | 5.5% | $337.12M | $283.75M |
| 3 | 4.5% | $352.38M | $272.10M |
| 4 | 3.5% | $364.75M | $258.40M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $373.87M | $242.99M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$299.79M
Terminal Value
$5.90B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$3.83B
Enterprise Value
$5.18B
Net Debt
$1.66B
Equity Value
$3.52B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$4.29
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.57
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 3 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Stocktwits · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Stocktwits · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Barrons.com · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Iridium Communications Inc (IRDM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 61/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
IRDM currently scores 61/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, IRDM's estimated fair value is $32.62, which is 30.2% below the current price of $46.77. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
IRDM's technical score is 68/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 24.7% — strong; Current ratio: 2.48.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $32.62 vs. price $46.77 (-30.2%); Calmar: -0.03 (3y annualized return -1.8% / max drawdown 68.8%); Free cash flow growth: -2.0%.
Yes — IRDM has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last Timothy James | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 2,013 | -2,013 | $47.36 |
| DESCH MATTHEW J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 9,583 | -9,583 | $46.98 |
| Last Timothy James | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 1,501 | -1,501 | $46.98 |
| Kapalka Timothy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 693 | -693 | $46.98 |
| Scheimreif Scott | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 2,207 | -2,207 | $46.98 |
| O'Neill Vincent James | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 1,461 | -1,461 | $46.98 |
| Morgan Kathleen A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 2,053 | -2,053 | $46.98 |
| McBride Suzanne E. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 3,623 | -3,623 | $46.98 |
| McBride Suzanne E. | Gift | 20.8.2026 | 17,403 | -17,403 | — |
| FITZPATRICK THOMAS | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 15,046 | -15,046 | $49.20 |
| NIEHAUS ROBERT H | Gift | 17.8.2026 | 50,000 | -50,000 | — |
| Last Timothy James | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 500 | -500 | $50.88 |
| Olson Eric T | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 8,000 | -8,000 | $50.61 |
| McBride Suzanne E. | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 85,454 | -85,454 | $50.28 |
| Morgan Kathleen A. | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 32,648 | -32,648 | $50.34 |
| Last Timothy James | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 19,021 | -19,021 | $50.33 |
| Kapalka Timothy | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 13,473 | -13,473 | $50.51 |
| FITZPATRICK THOMAS | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 209,233 | -209,233 | $50.22 |
| Morgan Kathleen A. | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 544 | -544 | $50.85 |
| Thoma Donald Lee | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 41,949 | +41,949 | — |
| Thoma Donald Lee | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 41,949 | +41,949 | — |
| YEANEY JACQUELINE E | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 29.8 | +29.8 | — |
| Sears Kay | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 29.8 | +29.8 | — |
| Shivanandan Monique S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 43.5 | +43.5 | — |
| Olson Eric T | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 384.8 | +384.8 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,559,792 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,457,705 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
49.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology