Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$298.22
▲ $1.74 (+0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/19 11:41 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$8.02B
Day Range
$293.57 - $298.40
52-Week Range
$256.11 - $376.86
Beta
—
Next Earnings
16.12.2026
Support
$293.57
Resistance
$376.86
HEI is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-7.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 33.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $157.66 vs. price $298.22 (-47.1%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (79/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
63
Value
33
Momentum
6
Risk
62
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
78
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Heico Corporation** highlights its strong financial performance and market optimism. Analysts have raised price targets and praised its record-breaking Q3 results, including a **33% net income jump** and **23% sales growth**, driven by bold investments and robust cash flow. Despite a recent **10% stock decline**, some analysts suggest a potential trend reversal due to its solid fundamentals and growth potential in aerospace. The company’s financial health and strategic bets remain focal points.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Heico Corporation. News trend score: 86. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
30
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
69
Fundamentals
78
Technical
6
Valuation
33
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-12%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+19
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (87) reflects traders’ fixation on the 0.6% support level, despite extreme sentiment (100/100) and valuation disconnect (+103% above DCF). Overconfidence (45) persists due to the valuation premium, though momentum lags fundamentals. The narrative gap (24) hints at a disconnect between bullish expectations and weak technicals. Key uncertainty remains: whether traders will hold near support or break away from the anchor under further pressure.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:06 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Net income jumped 33% to $235.4 million, net sales climbed 23% to $1.4 billion"
"Heico (HEI.A) exhibits above-average growth in financials"
"Morgan Stanley lowers price target from $370 to $365"
"Record net income and 14% organic growth highlight strong Q3 results"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 97/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 29/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies, with some models seeing it as a high-conviction opportunity and others dismissing it outright. The top scorers—Samuel Armstrong Nelson (98) and Edgar Lawrence Smith (89)—view it as a cyclical or long-term hold, emphasizing oversold conditions or decade-long potential, while Walter Bagehot (80) and Philip Fisher (76) highlight liquidity and exceptional quality as strengths. Meanwhile, the middle tier—including Thorstein Veblen (67) and Jack Schwager (65)—cautiously endorses it as a disciplined, value-aligned play, though with growing crowd sentiment (Charles Mackay, 62) raising minor concerns. On the opposite end, Benjamin Graham (30) and Jesse Livermore (40) outright reject it, with Graham citing defensive criteria failures and Livermore flagging a negative trend, while Howard Marks (45) and the efficient-market camp (56) question whether the stock’s merits justify active selection over passive indexing.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 97
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 89
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 80
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 78
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 76
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 75
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 71
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 67
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 66
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 61
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 56
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 30
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 29
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
39.8%
Operating Margin
22.7%
Net Margin
15.4%
EBITDA Margin
27.1%
ROE
16.0%
ROA
8.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.97
Cash
$217.78M
Total Debt
$3.36M
Current Ratio
2.83
Debt/Equity
0.00
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.7.2026 | $0.130 |
| 30.6.2026 | $0.130 |
| 5.1.2026 | $0.120 |
| 4.1.2026 | $0.120 |
| 1.7.2025 | $0.120 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.120 |
| 3.1.2025 | $0.110 |
| 2.1.2025 | $0.110 |
| 1.7.2024 | $0.110 |
| 30.6.2024 | $0.110 |
| 3.1.2024 | $0.100 |
| 2.1.2024 | $0.100 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$298.22
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$157.66
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-47.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $1.08B | $987.82M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $1.29B | $1.08B |
| 3 | 13.8% | $1.46B | $1.13B |
| 4 | 8.1% | $1.58B | $1.12B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.62B | $1.05B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$861.38M
Terminal Value
$25.55B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$16.61B
Enterprise Value
$21.98B
Net Debt
$-214.42M
Equity Value
$22.19B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$30.58
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$5.88
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 4 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
MT Newswires · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Barrons.com · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
The Fly · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Stocktwits · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Heico Corporation (HEI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
HEI currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, HEI's estimated fair value is $157.66, which is 47.1% below the current price of $298.22. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
HEI's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 33.5%; Free cash flow growth: 40.3%; Net income growth: 34.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $157.66 vs. price $298.22 (-47.1%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — HEI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHRIESHEIM ALAN | Gift | 1.9.2026 | 125 | -125 | — |
| MENDELSON VICTOR H | Gift | 29.6.2026 | 3,285 | -3,285 | — |
| Rowen Bradley K | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 1,326 | -1,326 | $241.63 |
| Rowen Bradley K | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 0 | -1,326 | $241.63 |
| SCHRIESHEIM ALAN | Gift | 1.6.2026 | 140 | -140 | — |
| SCHRIESHEIM ALAN | Gift | 1.6.2026 | 532 | -140 | — |
| Rowen Bradley K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 1,400 | -1,400 | — |
| Rowen Bradley K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 1,280 | -1,280 | — |
| Rowen Bradley K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 600 | -600 | — |
| Rowen Bradley K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.5.2026 | 874 | -874 | $259.81 |
| Rowen Bradley K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 1,400 | +1,400 | $130.71 |
| Rowen Bradley K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.5.2026 | 764 | -764 | $259.81 |
| Rowen Bradley K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 1,280 | +1,280 | $121.39 |
| Rowen Bradley K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.5.2026 | 316 | -316 | $259.81 |
| Rowen Bradley K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 600 | +600 | $97.00 |
| Rowen Bradley K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 600 | +600 | $97.00 |
| Rowen Bradley K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.5.2026 | 284 | -316 | $259.81 |
| Rowen Bradley K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 1,564 | +1,280 | $121.39 |
| Rowen Bradley K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.5.2026 | 800 | -764 | $259.81 |
| Rowen Bradley K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 2,200 | +1,400 | $130.71 |
| Rowen Bradley K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.5.2026 | 1,326 | -874 | $259.81 |
| Rowen Bradley K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 0 | -600 | — |
| Rowen Bradley K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 640 | -1,280 | — |
| Rowen Bradley K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.5.2026 | 2,100 | -1,400 | — |
| Macau Carlos L | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,203,636 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,890,190 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 66.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology