Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$45.84
▼ $0.29 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/19 06:37 PM
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$1.65B
Day Range
$45.70 - $46.16
52-Week Range
$27.28 - $46.57
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$39.53
Resistance
$46.57
GSL is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+38.4% (1Y)
🟢 Strong
Strengths: 8/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Global Ship Lease (GSL) exhibits a robust overall investor score of 83, driven primarily by strong technical indicators and overwhelmingly positive news sentiment. The technical category scores an 84, reflecting a bullish setup with the stock trading above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, alongside a positive MACD histogram and an RSI of 69.7, indicating healthy upward momentum. However, the RSI’s overbought status (%K 97.2) suggests potential near-term consolidation. News sentiment is exceptionally strong at 98, bolstered by multiple analyst upgrades and expansion announcements, though insider selling activity introduces a neutral counterpoint. Risk remains the weakest link, scoring 50, with a relatively low ATR (2.2%) and a Calmar ratio of 0.89—highlighting moderate volatility and a historical drawdown risk of 39.4% over three years. The combination of technical strength and positive news mitigates some risk concerns, but the overbought condition and declining volume could signal caution ahead.
The stock trades above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and RSI of 69.7, but is currently overbought (%K 97.2).
These technical signals suggest strong momentum but also potential for short-term pullback or consolidation.
The stock has received multiple positive analyst upgrades and expansion-related news, though insider selling activity is noted as neutral.
Positive news sentiment strongly supports investor confidence, while insider selling may introduce uncertainty.
The ATR is low at 2.2%, but the Calmar ratio (0.89) indicates a historical drawdown risk of 39.4% over three years.
While volatility is manageable, the high drawdown risk suggests potential for significant short-term declines.
StockIQ conclusion
Global Ship Lease demonstrates a strong technical and news-driven profile, supported by positive momentum and analyst optimism. However, the stock’s overbought status and declining volume introduce caution, while historical volatility and drawdown risks remain notable concerns. The overall score reflects a balanced outlook, where strengths in technicals and news are partially offset by elevated risk factors. Investors should monitor volume trends and momentum indicators closely for early signals of potential shifts.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/11/202676
This Week
77
7D Ago
→ -1
Stable
Technical
75
7D Ago: 78
↓ -3
News
92
7D Ago: 86
↑ +6
Risk
50
7D Ago: 50
→ 0
Biggest Improvements
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
76
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
4d ago · $45.74
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $45.74
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
10d ago · $44.71
Evidence: -3.1pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
10d ago · $45.12
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
10d ago · $45.12
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
13d ago · $46.40
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
14d ago · $46.40
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
14d ago · $46.40
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
15d ago · $46.15
Evidence: 9 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
15d ago · $45.66
Evidence: 9 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
17d ago · $45.01
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
17d ago · $44.53
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
22d ago · $44.99
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
76 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 27, 2026
Then
81
$44.20
Now
76
$45.84
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
75
Risk
50
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Global Ship Lease Inc.** has centered on its **dividend potential and fleet renewal strategy**. Analysts highlight its **strong balance sheet and high dividend yield**, positioning it as a stable income play amid rising bond yields. The company’s **15-vessel newbuild program** is noted for improving long-term earnings visibility and fleet quality, leading to an upgrade to "Buy." Insider sales and year-to-date stock performance outpacing peers also draw attention.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Global Ship Lease Inc New Class A Common. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
65
Fundamentals
—
Technical
75
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+21%
Market Narrative
64
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+14
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a **narrative-reality gap** (65 vs. 50) where optimism exceeds tangible fundamentals, with **euphoria** (25) and **anchoring** (20) as dominant forces. Positive momentum (+3.1% ROC) and high sentiment (92/100) align with overconfidence in upside, while proximity to resistance (4.0%) may anchor expectations. The key question: *Is the rally self-sustaining, or will profit-taking reveal overvaluation?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:10 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"The 15-vessel newbuild program materially improves Global Ship Lease's long-term earnings visibility and fleet quality"
"Global Ship Lease (GSL) and Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK) have performed compared to their sector so far this year"
"Global Ship Lease Insider Sold Shares Worth $2,251,239"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 20D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 64/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of each investor, the model estimates that the high 100 score from Edgar Lawrence Smith is not actionable because the required dividend and growth data are missing, leading to a neutral verdict. Moderate scores from Morgan Housel (61) and Gerald Loeb (56) suggest the stock is holdable but carries some risk, while the efficient‑market view (53) flags weak evidence for out‑performing an index. A cluster of 50‑point scores from Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Mackay, Bagehot, and Graham‑Enterprising all stem from insufficient fundamental or balance‑sheet information, producing essentially “no‑read” outcomes. Lower scores from Howard Marks (40 and 36), Jack Schwager (32), Samuel Nelson (28), and Thorstein Veblen (20) reflect concerns about high expectations, late‑cycle positioning, lack of a clear setup, overbought conditions, and growth pursued for its own sake, respectively, leading these methodologies to advise caution or avoidance.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 64
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 48
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 47
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 30
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 26
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 21.8.2026 | $0.625 |
| 22.5.2026 | $0.625 |
| 21.5.2026 | $0.625 |
| 24.2.2026 | $0.625 |
| 23.2.2026 | $0.625 |
| 21.11.2025 | $0.625 |
| 20.11.2025 | $0.625 |
| 22.8.2025 | $0.525 |
| 21.8.2025 | $0.525 |
| 23.5.2025 | $0.525 |
| 22.5.2025 | $0.525 |
| 24.2.2025 | $0.450 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Investor's Business Daily · 18.9.2026
Zacks · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
MT Newswires · 31.8.2026
MT Newswires · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 24.8.2026
Benzinga · 24.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Global Ship Lease Inc New Class A Common (GSL) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for GSL specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
GSL's technical score is 75/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 58.8 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Volume is falling despite the price advance — possible weakening.
Yes — GSL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psaropoulos Anastasios | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 68,698 | -48,330 | $45.02 |
| Psaropoulos Anastasios | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 48,330 | -48,330 | $45.02 |
| Lister Thomas Arthur | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 15,934 | -30,000 | $44.26 |
| Psaropoulos Anastasios | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 117,028 | -1,670 | $45.03 |
| Psaropoulos Anastasios | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 1,670 | -1,670 | $45.03 |
| Lister Thomas Arthur | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $44.26 |
| Neugeborn Yoram | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $41.13 |
| Neugeborn Yoram | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 3,174 | -3,000 | $41.13 |
| Giannopoulos Georgios | Open Market Sale | 7.4.2026 | 7,692 | -7,692 | $38.51 |
| Giannopoulos Georgios | Open Market Sale | 7.4.2026 | 0 | -7,692 | $38.51 |
| Psaropoulos Anastasios | Open Market Sale | 25.3.2026 | 23,173 | -23,173 | $39.00 |
| Psaropoulos Anastasios | Open Market Sale | 25.3.2026 | 108,102 | -23,173 | $39.00 |
| INTEGRATED CORE STRATEGIES (US) LLC | Open Market Sale | 29.6.2009 | 500 | -500 | $1.87 |
| INTEGRATED CORE STRATEGIES (US) LLC | Open Market Sale | 29.6.2009 | 10,500 | -10,500 | $1.86 |
| INTEGRATED CORE STRATEGIES (US) LLC | Open Market Sale | 26.6.2009 | 600 | -600 | $1.94 |
| INTEGRATED CORE STRATEGIES (US) LLC | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2009 | 2,999 | -2,999 | $2.05 |
| INTEGRATED CORE STRATEGIES (US) LLC | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2009 | 1 | -1 | $2.06 |
| INTEGRATED CORE STRATEGIES (US) LLC | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2009 | 4,700 | -4,700 | $2.20 |
| INTEGRATED CORE STRATEGIES (US) LLC | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2009 | 100 | -100 | $0.13 |
| INTEGRATED CORE STRATEGIES (US) LLC | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2009 | 49,900 | -49,900 | $0.12 |
| INTEGRATED CORE STRATEGIES (US) LLC | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2009 | 19,003 | -19,003 | $2.20 |
| INTEGRATED CORE STRATEGIES (US) LLC | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2009 | 100 | -100 | $0.10 |
| INTEGRATED CORE STRATEGIES (US) LLC | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2009 | 200 | -200 | $2.21 |
| INTEGRATED CORE STRATEGIES (US) LLC | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2009 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $2.18 |
| INTEGRATED CORE STRATEGIES (US) LLC | Open Market Sale | 4.6.2009 | 2,700 | -2,700 | $2.20 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
764,101 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 734,524 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology