Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$159.70
▼ $1.69 (-1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 08:24 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$2.82B
Day Range
$159.32 - $162.66
52-Week Range
$149.18 - $225.78
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$149.18
Resistance
$183.24
-7.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 48.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.68
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
68
$172.48
Now
54
$159.70
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
63
Value
55
Momentum
13
Risk
40
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
74
Institutional
67
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) has centered on its **Q2 earnings performance**, with mixed results and internal changes. Analysts highlighted its **stock price surge (158% return)** despite earnings volatility, while noting a **CFO departure** and **new 2026 guidance adjustments**. The company has also **intensified inventory acquisition**, targeting over **$200 million in spending** for long-term asset growth. Comparisons to peers in the mixed or offshore upstream energy sector were frequent, alongside debates on valuation and future stock potential.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Gulfport Energy Corporation Common. News trend score: 80. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
30
Fundamentals
74
Technical
13
Valuation
55
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+0%
Market Narrative
45
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
+2
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior at 65 suggests traders are fixating on the 1.7% resistance gap, likely using it as a mental reference point for valuation. While FOMO (33) and euphoria (18) indicate some excitement, the narrative gap (17) hints at a disconnect between market perception and fundamentals. The key question is whether traders will hold or adjust positions if the stock approaches resistance, given the absence of panic or herding. Overconfidence remains minimal, but the proximity to resistance could amplify anchoring effects if price stalls.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 11:33 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Gulfport Energy (GPOR) Stock Looks Undervalued Despite A 158% Return"
"Gulfport boosts acreage buys, targets $200M+ 2026 spend for 2.5+ years inventory"
"Gulfport Energy (NYSE:GPOR) Reports Mixed Earnings And CFO Exit"
"UBS analyst maintains Gulfport Energy (NYSE:GPOR) with a Buy and lowers the price target from $223 to $214"
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between growth-oriented and value-driven methodologies. Peter Lynch, Philip Fisher, and Thorstein Veblen—all focused on qualitative growth and competitive advantage—unanimously rate it near the top, with Lynch and Fisher calling it a standout ‘growth candidate’ and ‘exceptional company.’ Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham and his Enterprising Investor variant, along with Walter Bagehot and Samuel Armstrong Nelson, reject it outright, citing either statistical overvaluation or liquidity/overbought risks. The middle-ground approaches—like Jesse Livermore’s trend-following or Howard Marks’ cautionary ‘high expectations’ warning—suggest a mixed bag, where price momentum aligns with fundamentals but may not justify aggressive bets. The efficient-market camp and Jack Schwager’s neutral stance further muddy the waters, implying no clear edge over passive strategies.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 95
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 93
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 89
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 82
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 69
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 60
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 53
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 49
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 40
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 37
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 29
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 16
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
92.0%
Operating Margin
42.2%
Net Margin
30.1%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
23.3%
ROA
14.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$21.74
Cash
$1.81M
Total Debt
$788.19M
Current Ratio
0.68
Debt/Equity
0.43
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$97.59
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$46.29
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 9 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Fintel · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
StockStory · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
StockStory · 11.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 11.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 11.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 11.8.2026
StockStory · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Gulfport Energy Corporation Common (GPOR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GPOR currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
GPOR's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 48.5%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 245.9%; Net income growth: 263.7%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.68; Calmar: 0.38 (3y annualized return 12.5% / max drawdown 32.5%); Price is below the 50-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for GPOR.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willrath Matthew | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 325 | -325 | $182.69 |
| Secrist Bradley Neil | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.8.2026 | 132 | -132 | $158.45 |
| DELL'OSSO DOMENIC J JR | Open Market Purchase | 7.8.2026 | 1,600 | +1,600 | $160.61 |
| DELL'OSSO DOMENIC J JR | Open Market Purchase | 7.8.2026 | 24,349 | +1,600 | $160.61 |
| Secrist Bradley Neil | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.8.2026 | 1,900 | -132 | $158.45 |
| Wolf David D | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,028 | +1,028 | — |
| Martinez Jason Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,028 | +1,028 | — |
| Cutt Timothy J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,028 | +1,028 | — |
| DELL'OSSO DOMENIC J JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 22,749 | +22,749 | — |
| Powers Jean Marie | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,028 | +1,028 | — |
| Silver Point Capital L.P. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,028 | +1,028 | — |
| SLUITER MICHAEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,307 | +1,307 | — |
| Reganato David A | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,028 | +1,028 | — |
| Shafer-Malicki Mary | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,028 | +1,028 | — |
| MULE EDWARD A | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,028 | +1,028 | — |
| Wolf David D | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 5,490 | +1,028 | — |
| DELL'OSSO DOMENIC J JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 22,749 | +22,749 | — |
| Shafer-Malicki Mary | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 4,164 | +1,028 | — |
| Reganato David A | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,028 | +1,028 | — |
| Cutt Timothy J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 29,513 | +1,028 | — |
| SLUITER MICHAEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 10,338 | +1,307 | — |
| Martinez Jason Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 4,916 | +1,028 | — |
| Powers Jean Marie | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 4,129 | +1,028 | — |
| Willrath Matthew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 26.5.2026 | 134 | -134 | $178.22 |
| Willrath Matthew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 26.5.2026 | 2,455 | -134 | $178.22 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,033,274 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,025,727 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 68.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology