Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$73.88
▲ $0.14 (+0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:30 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$9.39B
Day Range
$73.26 - $74.30
52-Week Range
$48.71 - $92.41
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$66.31
Resistance
$83.35
FLS is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+28.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/25 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 23.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
51
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
66
Quality
50
Value
50
Momentum
16
Risk
56
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
62
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Flowserve Corporation** has focused on investor optimism and market valuation. Analysts like Gabelli Investment Management highlight its strong rebound in U.S. equities, with Flowserve’s stock gaining 6.76% in Q2 2026, though some argue its current price may still undervalue its cash flows after a 130% five-year return. No direct company-specific news on Flowserve was found—most headlines pertained to FLSmidth (a separate entity) or unrelated acquisitions. The available sources do not provide substantive recent updates on Flowserve’s operations, strategy, or financials.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Flowserve Corporation. News trend score: 92. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
21
Fundamentals
62
Technical
16
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-10%
Market Narrative
57
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests detached euphoria (+3.6% above 200-day average) despite flat momentum, with no clear herding or panic. The narrative gap (1 point) hints at a slight disconnect between sentiment (68/100) and technicals. Key open question: Will volume sustain the outperformance or revert to baseline? The absence of overconfidence or anchoring implies no extreme positioning, but the lack of momentum may limit upside momentum-driven FOMO. Neutral RSI (49) and low volatility (0.86x ATR) suggest caution over blind optimism.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:01 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Gabelli Investment Management Firm recently released its ‘Equity Income Fund’ second-quarter 2026 investor letter... [highlighting] growth ahead for Flowserve"
"Flowserve stock has delivered strong five-year returns... yet current checks suggest the market price may still sit below what the company’s cash flows could justify"
"Flowserve (FLS) has affirmed a quarterly cash dividend of $0.22 per share... MD Sass Concentrated Value Strategy has also recently disclosed a new position in the stock"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Thorstein Veblen — 77/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides the historical methodologies sharply, with some models seeing strong potential while others flag significant caution. The highest-scoring approaches—Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology analysis, Samuel Nelson’s cycle positioning, and Thorstein Veblen’s and Edgar Smith’s long-term growth alignment—all suggest the stock could be a durable, undervalued opportunity, particularly for patient investors. Conversely, the more conservative frameworks, like Benjamin Graham’s strict defensive criteria and the efficient-market hypothesis of Malkiel & Bogle, dismiss it outright, arguing either the valuation lacks margin of safety or active picking offers no clear edge. The middle ground, represented by Lynch, Marks, and Loeb, acknowledges the stock’s merits but warns that market expectations may already be pricing in its strengths, leaving little room for upside. This divergence reflects a core tension: whether the stock’s fundamentals justify a contrarian or growth-oriented bet (as Veblen and Smith imply) or if its risks—liquidity concerns, cyclical positioning, or overvaluation—make it a speculative gamble rather than a core holding.
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 77
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 77
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 75
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 71
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 64
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 55
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 45
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 32
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 24
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 21
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
15.8%
ROA
6.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.66
Cash
$760.18M
Total Debt
$1.58B
Current Ratio
2.03
Debt/Equity
0.72
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 26.6.2026 | $0.220 |
| 25.6.2026 | $0.220 |
| 27.3.2026 | $0.220 |
| 26.3.2026 | $0.220 |
| 26.12.2025 | $0.210 |
| 25.12.2025 | $0.210 |
| 26.9.2025 | $0.210 |
| 25.9.2025 | $0.210 |
| 27.6.2025 | $0.210 |
| 26.6.2025 | $0.210 |
| 28.3.2025 | $0.210 |
| 27.3.2025 | $0.210 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$16.73
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$4.59
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 5 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
MT Newswires · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
Business Wire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
StockStory · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
Flowserve Corporation (FLS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 51/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FLS currently scores 51/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
FLS's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 23.4%; Net income growth: 22.5%; Current ratio: 2.03.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — FLS has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hudson Susan Claire | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 31 | +31 | $79.09 |
| CHANDY RUBY R | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 82 | +82 | $80.64 |
| Johnson Cheryl H | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 445 | +445 | $80.64 |
| GARRISON JOHN L JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 944 | +944 | $80.64 |
| Johnson Cheryl H | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 14,714 | +445 | $80.64 |
| GARRISON JOHN L JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 41,629 | +944 | $80.64 |
| CHANDY RUBY R | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 35,936 | +82 | $80.64 |
| Hudson Susan Claire | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 48 | +48 | $75.99 |
| Hudson Susan Claire | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 24,858 | +48 | $75.99 |
| Rowe Robert Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 60 | +60 | $74.16 |
| Hudson Susan Claire | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 33 | +33 | $74.16 |
| Rowe Robert Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 507,835 | +60 | $74.16 |
| Hudson Susan Claire | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 24,810 | +33 | $74.16 |
| Boukalik Brian | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.6.2026 | 171 | -171 | $78.07 |
| Boukalik Brian | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 681 | -681 | — |
| Boukalik Brian | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 701 | +701 | — |
| Hudson Susan Claire | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 32 | +32 | $75.51 |
| Rowe Robert Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 58 | +58 | $75.51 |
| Rowe Robert Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 507,775 | +58 | $75.51 |
| Hudson Susan Claire | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 24,777 | +32 | $75.51 |
| McMurray Michael C. | Open Market Purchase | 18.5.2026 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $65.71 |
| McMurray Michael C. | Open Market Purchase | 18.5.2026 | 8,172 | +2,500 | $65.71 |
| Shuster Ross B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 2,573 | +2,573 | $67.99 |
| GARRISON JOHN L JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 2,573 | +2,573 | $67.99 |
| CHANDY RUBY R | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 88 | +88 | $68.38 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,980,015 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,065,766 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
76.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 66.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology