Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$35.15
▼ $0.33 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:51 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$5.37B
Day Range
$34.75 - $35.46
52-Week Range
$24.85 - $44.32
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$26.23
Resistance
$38.86
EXLS is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-17.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 27.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.13 (3y annualized return 6.6% / max drawdown 51.3%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
72
$37.45
Now
63
$35.15
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
55
Risk
54
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
74
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **ExlService Holdings, Inc.** has primarily focused on its strategic shifts and leadership changes, particularly the upcoming departure of Vivek Jetley, its president of Insurance, Healthcare, and Life Sciences, who is joining Hexaware Technologies as CEO. Analysts have also compared EXLS to rival NTNX, evaluating its long-term value as a data and AI company rather than just an IT vendor. Insider selling activity and its status as a small-cap stock with limited Wall Street coverage have also been highlighted, alongside discussions of its growth potential and risks.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about ExlService Holdings, Inc.. News trend score: 62. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
9
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
11
Fundamentals
74
Technical
55
Valuation
50
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+36%
Market Narrative
36
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
-6
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests **herding** dominates, with investors following peers downward despite the stock’s relative underperformance. The narrative gap (2 points) implies slight misalignment between sentiment and fundamentals, but euphoria lingers due to valuation metrics. Key open question: Will herding persist as peers lead further, or will euphoria’s valuation anchor resist? The low volatility (0.80x ATR) suggests no panic, but the gap may widen if momentum shifts.
Updated: 09/05/2026, 10:04 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Vivek Jetley, president and head of Insurance, Healthcare and Life Sciences is departing EXL to assume the role of CEO at Hexaware Technologies Limited"
"these businesses have increased downside risk because they lack the scale and staying power of their larger competitors"
"EXLS or NTNX: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now?"
"ExlService Holdings fits the Peter Lynch screen with strong 22.6% EPS growth and 28.9% ROE"
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 31/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for EXLS reflects deep philosophical and methodological splits among these investors. Walter Bagehot’s high score and verdict highlight the stock’s resilience in liquidity crises, aligning with his focus on financial stability, while Peter Lynch and Thorstein Veblen’s growth-oriented scores suggest the stock’s potential for underappreciated expansion—though neither signals extreme speculative risk. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s near-failure of defensive metrics and even his Enterprising Investor framework’s low score reveal a stark contrast, as Graham prioritizes deep valuation and margin of safety, which this stock lacks. The middle-ground methodologies—like Howard Marks’ mixed verdict or Jack Schwager’s neutral stance—reflect uncertainty about whether the stock’s strengths (growth, stability) outweigh its risks (overvaluation, cyclicality), while the efficient-market camp dismisses it outright, questioning whether active selection adds value over passive indexing.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 89
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 87
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 86
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 79
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 74
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 73
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 72
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 69
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 66
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 64
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 60
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 43
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 43
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 34
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 6 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
38.4%
Operating Margin
15.0%
Net Margin
12.0%
EBITDA Margin
17.9%
ROE
27.5%
ROA
14.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.56
Cash
$146.33M
Total Debt
$298.60M
Current Ratio
2.56
Debt/Equity
0.33
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$35.15
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$36.32
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+3.3%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
13.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.9% | $339.64M | $311.59M |
| 2 | 11.1% | $377.24M | $317.51M |
| 3 | 8.2% | $408.22M | $315.22M |
| 4 | 5.4% | $430.09M | $304.69M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $440.84M | $286.52M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$298.12M
Terminal Value
$6.95B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$4.52B
Enterprise Value
$6.05B
Net Debt
$152.27M
Equity Value
$5.90B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$5.62
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.81
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 10 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
ChartMill · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
ExlService Holdings, Inc. (EXLS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
EXLS currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, EXLS's estimated fair value is $36.32, which is 3.3% above the current price of $35.15. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
EXLS's technical score is 55/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 27.3%; Free cash flow growth: 34.1%; Net income growth: 26.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.13 (3y annualized return 6.6% / max drawdown 51.3%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; %K 19.1 — oversold.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for EXLS.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bhalla Vikas | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $38.17 |
| Chhibbar Vishal | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $35.10 |
| Chhibbar Vishal | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 6,452 | -5,000 | $35.10 |
| Bhalla Vikas | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 11,000 | -11,000 | $34.99 |
| Bhalla Vikas | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 130,295 | -11,000 | $34.99 |
| Mehta Kamini H | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 7,705 | +7,705 | — |
| Mehta Kamini H | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 7,705 | +7,705 | — |
| Bhalla Vikas | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 12,000 | -12,000 | $26.47 |
| Bhalla Vikas | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 141,295 | -12,000 | $26.47 |
| Nicolelli Maurizio | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 606 | +606 | $23.27 |
| Jetley Vivek | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 606 | +606 | $23.27 |
| Kini Narasimha | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 606 | +606 | $23.27 |
| Jetley Vivek | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 426,780 | +606 | $23.27 |
| Nicolelli Maurizio | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 254,975 | +606 | $23.27 |
| Kini Narasimha | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 212,354 | +606 | $23.27 |
| Pipes Kristy | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,871 | +7,871 | — |
| Fibig Andreas | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,871 | +7,871 | — |
| Geraghty Patrick | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,871 | +7,871 | — |
| Bartlett Thomas A | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,871 | +7,871 | — |
| Williamson Sarah K | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 1,711 | +1,711 | — |
| PANDIT VIKRAM S | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 11,293 | +11,293 | — |
| Williamson Sarah K | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 1,712 | +1,712 | — |
| Williamson Sarah K | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 7,871 | +7,871 | — |
| PANDIT VIKRAM S | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 84,378 | +11,293 | — |
| Fibig Andreas | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 28,427 | +7,871 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
10,979,985 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 10,781,663 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
57.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology