Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$1.52
▲ $0.05 (+3.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:49 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$1.41 - $1.53
52-Week Range
$1.23 - $5.18
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$1.23
Resistance
$1.82
EVGO is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-67.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/33 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 49.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -28.8% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $1.52
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 31 to 57 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
58
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
43
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of EVgo Inc. focuses primarily on its expanded national partnership with Regency Centers to add over 400 fast-charging stalls at
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about EVgo Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
50
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
44
Psychology
57
Fundamentals
43
Technical
58
Valuation
50
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-22%
Market Narrative
87
Fundamental Reality
44
Narrative Gap
+43
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests Loss Aversion is the primary driver, consistent with a severe 3-month decline of -32.0% on 1.13x average volume. Evidence indicates a narrative gap where high news sentiment of 98/100 contrasts with price trading -39.7% below its 200-day average. This divergence highlights an active bias as observable price trends diverge from positive headlines. The key open question is whether high narrative scoring can close the 9-point gap against reality scores.
Updated: 09/14/2026, 07:10 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Regency and EVgo plan to add 400+ charging stalls at Regency centers, expanding EV infrastructure by more than 20% across key U.S. markets."
"Shares of electric vehicle charging company EVgo (NASDAQ:EVGO) jumped 14.8% in the afternoon session after peer electric vehicle charging network operator ChargePoint reported quarterly financial results that topped analyst forecasts"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 18/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
EVGO splits the historical methodologies into two starkly opposing camps: the growth-oriented optimists and the cautious or bearish skeptics. Benjamin Graham’s Defensive Investor (90) and Peter Lynch (87) see potential, with Lynch highlighting undervalued growth and Graham’s Enterprising Investor (100) noting insufficient data but implying deeper analysis could uncover value. Howard Marks (75–83) also leans positive, framing the risk as reasonable and the market cycle as early-to-mid stage. In contrast, Fisher (48) dismisses it outright for lacking his signature quality, while Livermore (31) and Nelson (31) flag overbought conditions and negative trends, respectively. The divide is further sharpened by the Efficient Market proponents (49), who see no clear edge over indexing, and Housel (31), who warns of volatility that could deter patient investors. Even Smith (73), a long-term buy-and-hold advocate, sits uneasily between optimism and caution, while Schwager (57) and Loeb (53) remain neutral or mildly wary of risk.
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 90
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 87
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 68
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 57
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 45
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 34
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 18
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 4 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
21.0%
Operating Margin
-28.8%
Net Margin
-10.8%
EBITDA Margin
-9.5%
ROE
35.6%
ROA
-4.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.31
Cash
$151.00M
Total Debt
$206.46M
Current Ratio
2.19
Debt/Equity
-1.77
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1.52
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$24.20
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-155.54M | $-142.70M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-185.68M | $-156.28M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-211.21M | $-163.09M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-228.37M | $-161.78M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-234.08M | $-152.14M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-124.44M
Terminal Value
$-3.69B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-2.40B
Enterprise Value
$-3.18B
Net Debt
$55.46M
Equity Value
$-3.23B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$0.88
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$1.35
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
InvestorsHub · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
EVgo Inc. (EVGO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
EVGO currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
EVGO's technical score is 58/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 49.6%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 24.4%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -28.8% (negative); Net margin: -10.8% (negative); ATR: 6.2% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for EVGO.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan Francine | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 27,358 | -27,358 | — |
| Sullivan Francine | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 27,358 | +27,358 | — |
| KISH DENNIS G | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.8.2026 | 14,914 | -14,914 | $1.59 |
| KISH DENNIS G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 29,312 | +29,312 | — |
| KISH DENNIS G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 29,312 | -29,312 | — |
| Sullivan Francine | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.8.2026 | 10,766 | -10,766 | $1.59 |
| KISH DENNIS G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 277,627 | +29,312 | — |
| KISH DENNIS G | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 0 | -29,312 | — |
| KISH DENNIS G | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.8.2026 | 262,713 | -14,914 | $1.59 |
| Sullivan Francine | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 356,370 | +27,358 | — |
| Sullivan Francine | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.8.2026 | 0 | -27,358 | — |
| Sullivan Francine | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.8.2026 | 345,604 | -10,766 | $1.59 |
| MOTLAGH KATHERINE | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 63,745 | +63,745 | — |
| Griffith Scott W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 63,745 | +63,745 | — |
| Griffith Scott W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 63,745 | +63,745 | — |
| MOTLAGH KATHERINE | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 63,745 | +63,745 | — |
| Griffith Scott W. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.5.2026 | 5,556 | +5,556 | — |
| Griffith Scott W. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.5.2026 | 43,830 | -43,830 | — |
| Griffith Scott W. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.5.2026 | 43,830 | +43,830 | — |
| Griffith Scott W. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.5.2026 | 5,556 | -5,556 | — |
| Griffith Scott W. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.5.2026 | 64,444 | +5,556 | — |
| Griffith Scott W. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.5.2026 | 108,274 | +43,830 | — |
| Griffith Scott W. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.5.2026 | 0 | -43,830 | — |
| Griffith Scott W. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.5.2026 | 5,556 | -5,556 | — |
| MOTLAGH KATHERINE | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 43,830 | +43,830 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
41,371,477 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 41,782,949 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 54.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology