Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$743.35
▼ $5.21 (-0.7%)
Market data updated: 09/20 02:52 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$34.52B
Day Range
$737.11 - $747.95
52-Week Range
$453.00 - $1,016.06
Beta
—
Next Earnings
16.11.2026
Support
$696.19
Resistance
$876.85
ESLT is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+51.5% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 5/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
MACD
MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $748.56
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 11 to 37 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
49
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Elbit Systems Ltd.** has primarily focused on its **$270 million contract wins** for advanced intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance (ISR), and targeting payloads with an international customer, signaling strong demand in defense technology. While broader market trends and comparisons with competitors like Kratos Defense were noted, Elbit’s growth appears tied to expanding defense contracts, particularly in unmanned aerial systems (UAVs) and counter-drone solutions, though direct Elbit-specific developments beyond the contract announcements were limited.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Elbit Systems Ltd.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
44
Fundamentals
—
Technical
49
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
70
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+20
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **Loss Aversion** (58) reflects a market where traders are more focused on preserving capital after a 12.3% drawdown, despite muted volume and neutral momentum. The **narrative gap** (60 vs. 50) hints at a disconnect where optimism (e.g., perfect news sentiment) clashes with technical reality. **Anchoring** (39) may act as a floor, but the lack of panic or herding suggests caution rather than urgency. The key question: *Will traders hold near support, or will the gap widen as fundamentals diverge?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:34 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"$270M Deal Adds To A Growing Backlog"
"T3 Defense’s Rimon subsidiary launches mobile platforms for drone and counter-drone operations"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 67/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 18/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides methodologies sharply between those favoring technical or cyclical signals and those skeptical of its fundamentals or market positioning. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Charles Mackay both lean bullish, with Nelson seeing a favorable cycle position near oversold levels and Mackay detecting no crowd mania—suggesting a contrarian or momentum-friendly opportunity. Meanwhile, Jack Schwager and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) also support entry, with Schwager emphasizing disciplined risk/reward and Marks noting an early-to-mid cycle phase, implying room for upside. However, the valuation and growth-focused investors—like Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, and Peter Lynch—remain neutral due to insufficient data, while Morgan Housel and the efficient-market camp caution against overconfidence, questioning whether the stock’s merits justify active selection over passive indexing. At the opposite end, Thorstein Veblen and Jesse Livermore reject it outright, with Veblen flagging unchecked growth speculation and Livermore’s trend-following rules working against it, highlighting deep philosophical divides between growth-driven and trend-resistant strategies.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 67
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 59
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 56
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 54
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 33
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 18
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 5 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 23.6.2026 | $1.000 |
| 22.6.2026 | $1.000 |
| 13.4.2026 | $1.000 |
| 12.4.2026 | $1.000 |
| 22.12.2025 | $0.750 |
| 21.12.2025 | $0.750 |
| 14.10.2025 | $0.750 |
| 13.10.2025 | $0.750 |
| 24.6.2025 | $0.600 |
| 23.6.2025 | $0.600 |
| 22.4.2025 | $0.600 |
| 21.4.2025 | $0.600 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
PR Newswire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Barrons.com · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
InvestorsHub · 1.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESLT) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for ESLT specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
ESLT's technical score is 49/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; RSI 51.6 — healthy positive momentum; Price is above the SAR point — uptrend.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average; -7.7% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — ESLT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ariel Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 7,654 | -7,654 | $887.40 |
| Sabag Oren Yaacov | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $134.34 |
| Vered Yehuda | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 7,000 | +7,000 | $134.34 |
| Kril Ran | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 6,803 | -6,803 | $887.40 |
| Delmar Haim Daniel | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 7,654 | -7,654 | $887.40 |
| Kril Ran | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 8,000 | -8,000 | — |
| Delmar Haim Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 9,000 | -9,000 | — |
| Shmuely Yoram | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.4.2026 | 1,346 | -1,346 | $898.47 |
| Ariel Jonathan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.4.2026 | 1,346 | -1,346 | $898.47 |
| Vered Yehuda | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.4.2026 | 1,047 | -1,047 | $898.47 |
| Sabag Oren Yaacov | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 8,504 | -8,504 | $887.40 |
| Delmar Haim Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 9,000 | +9,000 | $134.34 |
| Vered Yehuda | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 5,953 | -5,953 | $887.40 |
| Vered Yehuda | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 7,000 | -7,000 | — |
| Sabag Oren Yaacov | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | — |
| Delmar Haim Daniel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.4.2026 | 1,346 | -1,346 | $898.47 |
| Ariel Jonathan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 9,000 | +9,000 | $134.34 |
| Shmuely Yoram | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 9,000 | -9,000 | — |
| Shmuely Yoram | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 7,654 | -7,654 | $887.40 |
| Ariel Jonathan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 9,000 | -9,000 | — |
| Machlis Bezhalel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 30,000 | +30,000 | $134.34 |
| Sabag Oren Yaacov | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.4.2026 | 1,496 | -1,496 | $898.47 |
| Shmuely Yoram | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 9,000 | +9,000 | $134.34 |
| Machlis Bezhalel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | — |
| Kril Ran | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.4.2026 | 1,197 | -1,197 | $898.47 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
213,064 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 249,525 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology