Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$12.46
▼ $1.21 (-8.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:08 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$323.50M
Day Range
$12.35 - $13.42
52-Week Range
$7.14 - $29.68
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$12.35
Resistance
$23.61
+62.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 33.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $1.33 vs. price $12.46 (-89.4%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
22
Risk
54
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
69
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Envela Corp. (ELA) has centered on its strong financial performance and investor appeal, particularly highlighting its earnings growth, profitability, and valuation metrics. Analysts emphasize its low debt, high return on equity (ROE), and favorable PEG ratio, positioning it as a value-growth stock. The company surpassed Q2 2026 earnings estimates, and its stock reached a 52-week high, with analysts maintaining a "Buy" rating despite a slight price target adjustment. Growth frameworks like Navellier’s and Peter Lynch’s screens also praise its surging earnings, margins, and cash flow.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Envela Corp.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 7 of the last 14 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
38
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
82
Fundamentals
69
Technical
22
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-55%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
+19
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant **Loss Aversion** (86) reflects deep psychological resistance to further declines, amplified by a 44.4% drop over three months. Overconfidence (45) suggests some investors may cling to the stock despite extreme valuation (+950% vs. DCF) and underperformance relative to fundamentals. The **narrative gap** (25-point disparity) hints at a disconnect between optimistic expectations and the stock’s deteriorating technicals. The key question: Will traders prioritize cutting losses or hold for a rebound, given the oversold conditions and muted volume? The absence of panic (20) or herding (0) suggests caution rather than panic-driven selling.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:52 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Envela Corporation (ELA) Surpasses Q2 Earnings Estimates"
"B. Riley Securities analyst Jeff Van Sinderen maintains Envela (AMEX:ELA) with a Buy and lowers the price target from $24 to $23"
"Envela (ELA) Hit a 52 Week High, Can the Run Continue?"
"Envela Corp (ELA) fits the Peter Lynch screen: strong EPS growth, low debt, high ROE, PEG under 1"
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 31/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between high-growth optimism and more cautious, value-oriented or market-neutral perspectives. Methodologies like Peter Lynch’s (96), Walter Bagehot’s (92), and Thorstein Veblen’s (89) all flag it as a compelling growth opportunity—either because the price hasn’t reflected its potential (Lynch), its liquidity suggests resilience (Bagehot), or its growth aligns with real economic value (Veblen). Meanwhile, mid-cycle bulls like Samuel Armstrong Nelson (87) and Howard Marks (84) see it as undervalued relative to its market position, while disciplined traders like Jack Schwager (77) and Edgar Lawrence Smith (73) still view it as a structured, long-term play. Yet, the divide widens when contrasting these with more skeptical frameworks: Howard Marks’ contrarian take (50) warns of overpriced expectations, while Fisher (49) and Livermore (46) dismiss it outright for lacking signature quality or clear trends. Even the efficient-market camp (53) and Graham’s defensive investors (30) reject it, either because it doesn’t justify active picking or fails basic valuation thresholds—highlighting how a stock can simultaneously appeal to growth hunters and repel value or trend-following investors.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 95
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 92
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 89
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 49
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 47
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 35
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 9 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
22.4%
Operating Margin
7.5%
Net Margin
6.1%
EBITDA Margin
8.3%
ROE
21.8%
ROA
15.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.56
Cash
$18.15M
Total Debt
$9.92M
Current Ratio
3.50
Debt/Equity
0.15
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$12.46
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$1.33
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-89.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.8% | $1.53M | $1.40M |
| 2 | 8.7% | $1.66M | $1.40M |
| 3 | 6.7% | $1.77M | $1.37M |
| 4 | 4.6% | $1.86M | $1.31M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.90M | $1.24M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.38M
Terminal Value
$29.99M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$19.49M
Enterprise Value
$26.22M
Net Debt
$-8.23M
Equity Value
$34.45M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$2.58
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.31
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 7 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 14 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 21.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
Zacks · 5.8.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 5.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 4.8.2026
ChartMill · 29.7.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 28.7.2026
Zacks · 1.7.2026
Zacks · 1.7.2026
Zacks · 29.6.2026
Zacks · 1.6.2026
Envela Corp. (ELA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ELA currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ELA's estimated fair value is $1.33, which is 89.4% below the current price of $12.46. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ELA's technical score is 22/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 33.6%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 115.4%; Net income growth: 116.0%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $1.33 vs. price $12.46 (-89.4%); ATR: 6.0% of price; Free cash flow growth: -79.5%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ELA.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 19 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 19 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeLuca John Garrett | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 105 | +105 | $13.76 |
| DeLuca John Garrett | Open Market Purchase | 22.5.2026 | 55 | +55 | $23.94 |
| DeLuca John Garrett | Open Market Purchase | 22.5.2026 | 3,196 | +55 | $23.94 |
| DeLuca John Garrett | Open Market Purchase | 28.11.2025 | 90 | +90 | $11.78 |
| DeLuca John Garrett | Open Market Purchase | 28.11.2025 | 3,141 | +90 | $11.78 |
| DeLuca John Garrett | Open Market Purchase | 19.8.2025 | 280 | +280 | $7.09 |
| DeLuca John Garrett | Open Market Purchase | 19.8.2025 | 3,051 | +280 | $7.09 |
| DeLuca John Garrett | Open Market Purchase | 4.6.2025 | 500 | +500 | $5.81 |
| DeLuca John Garrett | Open Market Purchase | 5.12.2024 | 125 | +125 | $7.48 |
| DeLuca John Garrett | Open Market Purchase | 22.8.2024 | 400 | +400 | $5.15 |
| DeLuca John Garrett | Open Market Purchase | 30.5.2024 | 400 | +400 | $4.59 |
| DeLuca John Garrett | Open Market Purchase | 16.5.2024 | 225 | +225 | $4.60 |
| DeStefano Allison M | Open Market Purchase | 29.11.2023 | 400 | +400 | $4.25 |
| DeStefano Allison M | Open Market Purchase | 29.11.2023 | 432 | +432 | $4.27 |
| Pedersen Bret Allen | Open Market Purchase | 27.11.2023 | 220 | +220 | $4.15 |
| DeStefano Allison M | Open Market Purchase | 13.11.2023 | 850 | +850 | $3.38 |
| DeStefano Allison M | Open Market Purchase | 21.8.2023 | 300 | +300 | $5.55 |
| Pedersen Bret Allen | Open Market Purchase | 9.8.2023 | 208 | +208 | $5.60 |
| DeStefano Allison M | Open Market Purchase | 9.8.2023 | 2,516 | +2,516 | $5.55 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
473,849 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 395,545 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
49.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology