Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$66.03
▼ $1.83 (-2.7%)
Market data updated: 09/19 02:54 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$2.47B
Day Range
$65.87 - $67.55
52-Week Range
$62.50 - $90.56
Beta
—
Next Earnings
16.10.2026
Support
$65.87
Resistance
$83.97
-26.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $148.38 vs. price $66.03 (+124.7%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.16 (3y annualized return -7.1% / max drawdown 45.3%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
50
Quality
58
Value
67
Momentum
13
Risk
36
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
54
Institutional
60
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has centered on its financial performance and market positioning within the diversified financial services sector. Analysts discussed its Q2 earnings relative to peers, noting its profitability and growth potential, though concerns about debt and lack of dividends were highlighted. Wolfe Research downgraded its rating to "Underperform" while lowering its price target to $70. Additionally, Euronet’s strategic partnerships, like its collaboration with Unibanca in Peru, were mentioned as efforts to drive innovation in the financial sector.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Euronet Worldwide, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
95
Fundamentals
54
Technical
13
Valuation
67
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+0%
Market Narrative
48
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior suggests traders are aligning with peers despite EEFT’s relative underperformance today. Positive sentiment and momentum may fuel FOMO, but the narrative-reality gap (16 points) hints at mispricing or misalignment. Overconfidence is muted, yet euphoria lingers due to extreme sentiment. The key question: is herding driven by relative strength or a collective misreading of fundamentals? The gap implies traders may be anchoring to recent momentum rather than intrinsic value.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:54 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Wolfe Research maintains Euronet Worldwide with an **Underperform** and lowers the price target from **$75 to $70**."
"Euronet and Unibanca Partner to Accelerate Innovation Across Peru's Financial Sector (multi-year SaaS agreement)."
"Euronet Worldwide (EEFT) passes the **Decent Value screen: low P/E, strong profitability, and growth** (ChartMill)."
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 97/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 5/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some approaches seeing cautious optimism while others flag significant red flags. Charles Mackay and Thorstein Veblen both score it highly (71), suggesting it avoids crowd-driven mania and aligns with real economic growth—though neither explicitly endorses it. In contrast, value-focused investors like Benjamin Graham (56) and the Enterprising Investor variant (32) dismiss it as statistically overpriced, while Fisher, Lynch, and Smith (all scoring 30 or lower) reject it for lacking the growth, stability, or quality they demand. Meanwhile, market-timing models like Nelson (37) and Housel (4) warn of overbought conditions or volatility that could trigger panic selling, while efficiency advocates (Malkiel/Bogle, 53) see no clear edge over passive indexing. The middle ground—where Schwager (53) and Marks (52) hesitate—reflects uncertainty about whether the stock’s risks are justified by its potential.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 97
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 58
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 34
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 32
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 30
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 30
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 22
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 15
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 13
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 5
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
12.5%
Net Margin
7.3%
EBITDA Margin
15.7%
ROE
23.7%
ROA
4.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.40
Cash
$1.04B
Total Debt
$2.02B
Current Ratio
1.11
Debt/Equity
1.55
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$66.03
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$148.38
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+124.7%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
8.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.1% | $469.57M | $430.79M |
| 2 | 6.7% | $501.10M | $421.76M |
| 3 | 5.3% | $527.71M | $407.49M |
| 4 | 3.9% | $548.31M | $388.44M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $562.02M | $365.28M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$434.30M
Terminal Value
$8.86B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.76B
Enterprise Value
$7.77B
Net Debt
$980.50M
Equity Value
$6.79B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$28.56
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.09
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 5 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
StockStory · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 21.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
Yahoo · 20.8.2026
StockStory · 20.8.2026
StockStory · 13.8.2026
Yahoo · 13.8.2026
ChartMill · 11.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 4.8.2026
Yahoo · 4.8.2026
Motley Fool · 4.8.2026
Yahoo · 3.8.2026
StockStory · 1.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 31.7.2026
Yahoo · 31.7.2026
Zacks · 31.7.2026
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
EEFT currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, EEFT's estimated fair value is $148.38, which is 124.7% above the current price of $66.03. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
EEFT's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $148.38 vs. price $66.03 (+124.7%); Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 23.7% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.16 (3y annualized return -7.1% / max drawdown 45.3%); Free cash flow growth: -29.5%; Debt/equity: 1.55.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for EEFT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 3 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCDONNELL THOMAS A | Open Market Purchase | 7.8.2026 | 781 | +781 | $70.60 |
| MCDONNELL THOMAS A | Open Market Purchase | 26.5.2026 | 3,000 | +3,000 | $66.87 |
| MCDONNELL THOMAS A | Open Market Purchase | 26.5.2026 | 100,219 | +3,000 | $66.87 |
| Sprong Bradley Nixon | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 4,436 | +4,436 | — |
| ALTHASEN PAUL | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.5.2026 | 1,286 | -1,286 | $66.50 |
| Herrero Sergi N. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 4,060 | +4,060 | — |
| Baack Sara | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 2,556 | +2,556 | — |
| Sprong Bradley Nixon | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.5.2026 | 2,022 | -2,022 | $66.50 |
| ALTHASEN PAUL | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 4,286 | +4,286 | — |
| Torres Fentanes Ligia | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 2,556 | +2,556 | — |
| MCDONNELL THOMAS A | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 4,586 | +4,586 | — |
| Baack Sara | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.5.2026 | 1,008 | -1,008 | $66.50 |
| Frumkin Michael N | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 4,361 | +4,361 | — |
| Baack Sara | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 6,049 | +2,556 | — |
| Baack Sara | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.5.2026 | 5,041 | -1,008 | $66.50 |
| Frumkin Michael N | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 16,344 | +4,361 | — |
| MCDONNELL THOMAS A | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 97,219 | +4,586 | — |
| Sprong Bradley Nixon | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 6,618 | +4,436 | — |
| Sprong Bradley Nixon | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.5.2026 | 4,596 | -2,022 | $66.50 |
| Torres Fentanes Ligia | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 9,201 | +2,556 | — |
| Herrero Sergi N. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 8,668 | +4,060 | — |
| ALTHASEN PAUL | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 62,840 | +4,286 | — |
| ALTHASEN PAUL | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.5.2026 | 61,554 | -1,286 | $66.50 |
| Godderz Adam | Open Market Sale | 7.5.2026 | 345 | -345 | $72.03 |
| Godderz Adam | Open Market Sale | 7.5.2026 | 0 | -345 | $72.03 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,701,462 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,045,505 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
66.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology