Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$651.53
▼ $14.87 (-2.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:51 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$897.78M
Day Range
$648.19 - $672.17
52-Week Range
$348.63 - $692.50
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.12.2026
Support
$534.89
Resistance
$692.50
DJCO is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+46.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 20/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $214.11 vs. price $651.53 (-67.1%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (82/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (43/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
70
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 16, 2026
Then
69
$687.66
Now
70
$651.53
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
58
Value
43
Momentum
88
Risk
56
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
71
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Daily Journal Corp. (DJCO) has primarily focused on its financial performance and shifting business dynamics. Reports highlight a **third-quarter loss** driven by higher costs and declining revenue in traditional print news operations, though its **Journal Technologies segment**—likely tied to digital or media tech—showed strong growth. Analysts have downgraded the stock, citing mixed performance while noting its holding company structure may justify current discounts. No direct company-specific news beyond these financial updates emerged.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Daily Journal Corp. (S.C.). News trend score: 62. Reason: 6 of the last 19 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
31
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
53
Fundamentals
71
Technical
88
Valuation
43
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+23%
Market Narrative
68
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+27
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests traders are overconfident in DJCO’s valuation, with a 193% premium over DCF fair value reinforcing optimism. Euphoria is also present, driven by strong momentum and positive sentiment, though anchoring near resistance may limit upside. The narrative gap (29 points) indicates traders are more optimistic than fundamentals justify. The key question: will overconfidence sustain despite valuation extremes?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 01:30 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Daily Journal's Journal Technologies segment continues impressive growth, offsetting declines in traditional print news operations"
"Total Revenue of $27.0 Million, Reflecting a 15% Increase Year-Over-Year"
"DJCO had a good performance in terms of revenue growth over expenses, which had non-recurring growth components"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 31/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for DJCO reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. At the top, Bagehot, Lynch, and Fisher—who prioritize liquidity, growth potential, and long-term quality—all rate the stock near-perfectly, suggesting it meets their core criteria for resilience, undervaluation, or exceptional management. Meanwhile, more conservative or cyclical-focused thinkers like Marks, Nelson, and Schwager—who emphasize valuation extremes, market timing, or technical setups—score it poorly, warning of overbought conditions or a lack of disciplined entry signals. Even Graham’s two approaches split: his traditional bar is barely met, while his enterprising investor lens sees a modest discount. This tension highlights whether the stock’s strengths (growth, quality, liquidity) outweigh its perceived risks (valuation, cycle positioning) under each framework.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 95
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 61
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 57
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 55
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 54
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 52
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 47
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 36
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 31
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
10.9%
Net Margin
127.9%
EBITDA Margin
11.2%
ROE
28.7%
ROA
20.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$81.41
Cash
$20.57M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
13.89
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$651.53
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$214.11
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-67.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
18.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.0% | $15.73M | $14.43M |
| 2 | 14.1% | $17.95M | $15.11M |
| 3 | 10.3% | $19.79M | $15.28M |
| 4 | 6.4% | $21.05M | $14.92M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $21.58M | $14.03M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$13.32M
Terminal Value
$340.30M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$221.17M
Enterprise Value
$294.93M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$294.93M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$283.89
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$283.89
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 9 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 19 articles.
Barchart · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Barchart · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Barchart · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 22.8.2026
Yahoo · 21.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
Zacks · 20.8.2026
Zacks · 19.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.8.2026
Associated Press · 12.8.2026
Yahoo · 12.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
Barchart · 7.6.2026
Zacks · 4.6.2026
Zacks · 26.5.2026
Daily Journal Corp. (S.C.) (DJCO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 70/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DJCO currently scores 70/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DJCO's estimated fair value is $214.11, which is 67.1% below the current price of $651.53. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DJCO's technical score is 88/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Revenue growth (last year): 25.4%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 43.5%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $214.11 vs. price $651.53 (-67.1%); Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DJCO.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conlin Mary Murphy | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.12.2025 | 50 | +50 | — |
| Frank John | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.12.2025 | 50 | +50 | — |
| Frank John | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.12.2025 | 115 | +50 | — |
| Conlin Mary Murphy | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.12.2025 | 215 | +50 | — |
| Rayani Rasool | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.12.2025 | 50 | +50 | — |
| Rayani Rasool | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.12.2025 | 115 | +50 | — |
| Conlin Mary Murphy | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.12.2024 | 44 | +44 | — |
| Frank John | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.12.2024 | 44 | +44 | — |
| Rayani Rasool | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.12.2024 | 44 | +44 | — |
| Conlin Mary Murphy | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.5.2024 | 21 | +21 | — |
| Frank John | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.5.2024 | 21 | +21 | — |
| Rayani Rasool | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.5.2024 | 21 | +21 | — |
| MUNGER CHARLES T | Other Transaction | 16.6.2022 | 3,720 | -3,720 | — |
| Salzman Gerald L | Open Market Sale | 22.12.2020 | 8,286 | -8,286 | $332.00 |
| Salzman Gerald L | Open Market Sale | 11.12.2020 | 1,800 | -1,800 | $300.00 |
| Salzman Gerald L | Open Market Sale | 10.12.2020 | 854 | -854 | $282.00 |
| Salzman Gerald L | Open Market Sale | 9.12.2020 | 346 | -346 | $278.00 |
| Salzman Gerald L | Open Market Sale | 12.11.2020 | 286 | -286 | $285.00 |
| Salzman Gerald L | Open Market Sale | 10.11.2020 | 653 | -653 | $281.00 |
| Salzman Gerald L | Open Market Sale | 9.11.2020 | 1,577 | -1,577 | $281.00 |
| Salzman Gerald L | Open Market Sale | 6.11.2020 | 203 | -203 | $280.00 |
| Salzman Gerald L | Open Market Sale | 5.11.2020 | 36 | -36 | $280.00 |
| Salzman Gerald L | Open Market Sale | 4.11.2020 | 211 | -211 | $280.00 |
| Salzman Gerald L | Open Market Sale | 3.11.2020 | 1,281 | -1,281 | $280.00 |
| Salzman Gerald L | Open Market Sale | 30.10.2020 | 100 | -100 | $281.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
161,752 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 149,893 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
63.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 57.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology