Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Telecommunications · ·
$17.37
▼ $0.74 (-4.1%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:35 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$98.56M
Day Range
$16.99 - $18.18
52-Week Range
$16.99 - $180.74
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$16.99
Resistance
$45.57
-89.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 1/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $123.03 vs. price $17.37 (+608.3%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -13.8% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
30
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
42
Value
62
Momentum
9
Risk
20
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
12
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Cable One, Inc.** has primarily focused on its **Q2 earnings performance** in the competitive consumer discretionary sector, particularly in comparison to peers in wireless, cable, and satellite industries. The company saw a **20.2% stock gain** on a single trading day, reflecting investor interest amid broader market movements. Additionally, there was a leadership transition announcement with **Ken Johnson named as CEO**, though no further operational details were provided. The sources were limited, so no deeper financial or strategic developments were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Cable One, Inc.. News trend score: 74. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
36
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
33
Psychology
68
Fundamentals
12
Technical
9
Valuation
62
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-58%
Market Narrative
30
Fundamental Reality
33
Narrative Gap
-3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for CABO suggests a strong **loss aversion** bias, as traders appear anchored to recent support (3.5% away) while grappling with a 47.1% drop over three months. The muted volume (0.91x average) and neutral RSI (37) indicate cautious, risk-averse positioning rather than panic or FOMO. The narrative gap (-13) hints at a disconnect between investor perceptions (lower confidence) and objective reality (potential undervaluation). The key question is whether traders will hold near support or exit further, given the lack of momentum or euphoric signals.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:23 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Cable One (NYSE:CABO) shares rose 20.2% to $28.69 during Wednesday’s regular session"
"Cable One (CABO) Fights Subscriber Losses"
"The 5 Most Interesting Analyst Questions From Cable One’s Q2 Earnings Call"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles, the model estimates that investors focused on market cycles and disciplined setups—Nelson, Mackay, Howard Marks (cycle view), and Schwager—assign high scores (98‑74) and see the stock as favorably positioned or offering a good risk‑reward profile. In contrast, valuation‑oriented thinkers like Graham (both frameworks) and Marks (overall) give moderate scores (55‑60), indicating the business meets some criteria but may not be cheap enough or could have inflated expectations. Long‑term stability and efficiency‑focused approaches such as Smith, the efficient‑market duo, Veblen, Livermore, Loeb, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot, and Housel assign very low scores (0‑34), flagging concerns about liquidity, volatility, lack of durable growth, or excessive risk. The spread of scores therefore reflects how the methodologies weigh cycle position, intrinsic value, quality, and risk differently, leading to a broadly mixed assessment of the stock.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 88
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 87
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 79
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 60
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 56
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 34
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 31
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 24
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 8
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 7
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-13.8%
Net Margin
-23.7%
EBITDA Margin
8.7%
ROE
-24.9%
ROA
-6.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$63.21
Cash
$152.77M
Total Debt
$3.21B
Current Ratio
0.40
Debt/Equity
2.24
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 18.2.2025 | $2.950 |
| 17.2.2025 | $2.950 |
| 3.12.2024 | $2.950 |
| 2.12.2024 | $2.950 |
| 27.8.2024 | $2.950 |
| 26.8.2024 | $2.950 |
| 24.5.2024 | $2.950 |
| 23.5.2024 | $2.950 |
| 16.2.2024 | $2.950 |
| 15.2.2024 | $2.950 |
| 27.11.2023 | $2.950 |
| 26.11.2023 | $2.950 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$17.37
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$123.03
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+608.3%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-4.2%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -4.2% | $266.53M | $244.52M |
| 2 | -2.5% | $259.89M | $218.75M |
| 3 | -0.8% | $257.75M | $199.03M |
| 4 | 0.8% | $259.90M | $184.12M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $266.40M | $173.14M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$278.07M
Terminal Value
$4.20B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.73B
Enterprise Value
$3.75B
Net Debt
$3.06B
Equity Value
$693.84M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$254.20
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$244.97
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 12 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
StockStory · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
StockStory · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
PR Newswire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 2.9.2026
Cable One, Inc. (CABO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 30/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CABO currently scores 30/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, CABO's estimated fair value is $123.03, which is 608.3% above the current price of $17.37. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
CABO's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $123.03 vs. price $17.37 (+608.3%).
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -13.8% (negative); Net margin: -23.7% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
Yes — CABO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McCallion Heather A | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 41,893 | +41,893 | — |
| Arntzen Christopher J | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 10,002 | +10,002 | — |
| Arntzen Christopher J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 40 | -40 | $39.99 |
| Arntzen Christopher J | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 15,003 | +15,003 | — |
| Arntzen Christopher J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 1,843 | -40 | $39.99 |
| Arntzen Christopher J | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 14,994 | +10,002 | — |
| Arntzen Christopher J | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 22,491 | +15,003 | — |
| Meduski Mary E | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 5,035 | +5,035 | $51.13 |
| Smith Sherrese M | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 4,791 | +4,791 | $51.13 |
| Weymouth Katharine | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 3,031 | +3,031 | $51.13 |
| WEITZ WALLACE R | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 4,986 | +4,986 | $51.13 |
| Brian Brad D. | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 3,911 | +3,911 | $51.13 |
| Bartolo P Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 3,031 | +3,031 | $51.13 |
| Kissire Deborah J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 3,031 | +3,031 | $51.13 |
| Weymouth Katharine | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 5,195 | +3,031 | $51.13 |
| Bartolo P Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 4,547 | +3,031 | $51.13 |
| WEITZ WALLACE R | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 22,126 | +4,986 | $51.13 |
| Brian Brad D. | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 8,201 | +3,911 | $51.13 |
| Kissire Deborah J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 6,349 | +3,031 | $51.13 |
| Meduski Mary E | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 8,634 | +5,035 | $51.13 |
| Smith Sherrese M | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 7,665 | +4,791 | $51.13 |
| Koetje Todd M | Open Market Purchase | 3.3.2026 | 998 | +998 | $100.16 |
| Koetje Todd M | Open Market Purchase | 3.3.2026 | 7,696 | +998 | $100.16 |
| Holanda James A | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 44,004 | +44,004 | — |
| Holanda James A | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.2.2026 | 44,004 | +44,004 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
842,479 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 808,809 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 61.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology