Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Telecommunications · ·
$35.59
▼ $1.26 (-3.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 06:46 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$1.89B
Day Range
$35.52 - $36.80
52-Week Range
$33.71 - $60.82
Beta
—
Next Earnings
01.11.2026
Support
$33.71
Resistance
$38.98
-26.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 58.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $26.28 vs. price $35.59 (-26.2%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
41
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
16d ago · $38.73
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 35 to 62 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
42
Value
33
Momentum
12
Risk
34
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
38
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Array Digital Infrastructure (AD) has centered on its relationship with Telephone and Data Systems (TDS), which abruptly withdrew its proposed buyout offer for the remaining shares of Array in early September 2026. TDS, which already owns 82% of Array, announced it would no longer pursue the acquisition of public shares, citing unspecified reasons, and resumed share repurchases instead. Earlier analyst commentary had briefly highlighted Array as a potential growth stock, though valuation concerns and price target adjustments by JP Morgan were also noted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. Common. News trend score: 98. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
46
Psychology
36
Fundamentals
38
Technical
12
Valuation
33
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-8%
Market Narrative
70
Fundamental Reality
46
Narrative Gap
+24
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests traders are anchored near resistance (1.4% away), while FOMO and overconfidence drive buying despite overvaluation (+46% vs. DCF). The narrative gap (85 vs. 46) implies optimism exceeds fundamentals, but loss aversion lingers from the recent 26.5% decline. The key question: will traders break resistance or retreat if momentum stalls? Overconfidence may persist if sentiment remains extreme, but anchoring near resistance could cap upside.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 10:48 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"TDS announced it is no longer pursuing the acquisition of public shares of Array Digital Infrastructure"
"Companies that cannot maintain growth are often penalized with large declines in market value"
"JP Morgan lowers price target from $54 to $45"
"TDS plans to resume share repurchases after withdrawing buyout proposal"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 5/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-focused and risk-averse methodologies. Peter Lynch’s high score (88) suggests it’s a compelling growth candidate where the price hasn’t yet reflected its potential, aligning with his 'buy what you know' and earnings-driven approach. Meanwhile, long-term buy-and-hold advocates like Edgar Lawrence Smith (69) see it as a decade-long hold, but even they acknowledge mixed signals from others—Thorstein Veblen (56) questions whether growth translates to profits, while Philip Fisher (53) finds it solid but not exceptional. On the opposite end, defensive investors like Benjamin Graham (20) and Walter Bagehot (5) outright reject it, with Graham calling it unsafe and Bagehot flagging liquidity risks. The middle ground—where Jack Schwager (56) sees no clear edge and Howard Marks (35/37) warns of late-cycle or valuation risks—reflects a stock that excites some but alarms those prioritizing caution or market efficiency.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 88
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 69
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 67
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 53
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 33
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 23
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 21
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 20
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 5
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
51.2%
Operating Margin
-56.8%
Net Margin
29.9%
EBITDA Margin
-32.8%
ROE
1.9%
ROA
1.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.57
Cash
$113.40M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
0.72
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.6.2026 | $11.000 |
| 10.6.2026 | $11.000 |
| 23.1.2026 | $10.250 |
| 22.1.2026 | $10.250 |
| 20.8.2025 | $23.000 |
| 19.8.2025 | $23.000 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$35.59
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$26.28
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-26.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $164.95M | $151.33M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $159.80M | $134.50M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $157.80M | $121.85M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $158.79M | $112.49M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $162.76M | $105.78M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$173.64M
Terminal Value
$2.57B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.67B
Enterprise Value
$2.29B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$2.29B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$29.41
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$29.41
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 6 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
MT Newswires · 2.9.2026
MT Newswires · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
PR Newswire · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
StockStory · 25.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 19.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 18.8.2026
StockStory · 18.8.2026
StockStory · 17.8.2026
StockStory · 16.8.2026
Zacks · 12.8.2026
MarketBeat · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 10.8.2026
Zacks · 10.8.2026
MarketBeat · 9.8.2026
ChartMill · 7.8.2026
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. Common (AD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 41/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AD currently scores 41/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AD's estimated fair value is $26.28, which is 26.2% below the current price of $35.59. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AD's technical score is 12/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 58.3%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 221.7%; Net income growth: 223.7%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $26.28 vs. price $35.59 (-26.2%); Operating margin: -56.8% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
Yes — AD has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HARCZAK HARRY J JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 1,873 | +1,873 | $50.91 |
| Iriarte Esteban C | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 1,873 | +1,873 | $50.91 |
| Williams Xavier | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 1,873 | +1,873 | $50.91 |
| HARCZAK HARRY J JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 21,247 | +1,873 | $50.91 |
| Williams Xavier | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 8,735 | +1,873 | $50.91 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.4.2026 | 1,217 | -1,217 | $48.00 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.4.2026 | 511 | -511 | $48.00 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.4.2026 | 1,742 | -1,742 | $48.00 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.4.2026 | 1,742 | +1,742 | $48.00 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.4.2026 | 4,150 | -4,150 | $48.00 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.4.2026 | 4,150 | +4,150 | $48.00 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.4.2026 | 10,671 | +1,742 | $48.00 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.4.2026 | 10,160 | -511 | $48.00 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.4.2026 | 14,310 | +4,150 | $48.00 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.4.2026 | 13,093 | -1,217 | $48.00 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.4.2026 | 0 | -4,150 | $48.00 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.3.2026 | 5,805 | +5,805 | — |
| Carlson Anthony J | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.3.2026 | 5,805 | +5,805 | — |
| Carlson Anthony J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.3.2026 | 349 | -349 | $49.91 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.3.2026 | 1,004 | +1,004 | $49.91 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.3.2026 | 1,004 | -1,004 | $49.91 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.3.2026 | 9,278 | +1,004 | $49.91 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.3.2026 | 8,929 | -349 | $49.91 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.3.2026 | 1,003 | -1,004 | $49.91 |
| Carlson Anthony J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.1.2026 | 1,355 | -1,355 | $54.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,560,719 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,949,677 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
48.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 44.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology