Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$63.32
▼ $0.44 (-0.7%)
Market data updated: 09/19 10:23 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$12.90B
Day Range
$62.49 - $63.99
52-Week Range
$40.50 - $78.82
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$60.07
Resistance
$70.98
BWA is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+42.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 2.07
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
36
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
42
Value
45
Momentum
26
Risk
48
Sentiment
8
Fundamental
45
Institutional
5
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of BorgWarner Inc. has centered on its stock performance, valuation debates, and sustainability initiatives. Analysts discuss whether the stock, up 88% over five years, is overvalued despite strong returns, while the company released its 2026 *Powering Tomorrow* sustainability report, emphasizing emissions reduction and clean energy progress. Additionally, a vice president sold shares, sparking investor scrutiny amid analyst praise for its earnings and product portfolio.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about BorgWarner Inc.. News trend score: 8. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 5 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
21
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
42
Fundamentals
45
Technical
26
Valuation
45
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-12%
Market Narrative
27
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
-9
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for BWA suggests a **psychological stalemate**—neither FOMO nor panic dominates, but low sentiment and neutral momentum create indecision. Overconfidence hints traders may overvalue recent price gains relative to fundamentals, while the narrative gap implies reality outpaces expectations. The key question is whether the lack of news sentiment or volatility will persist, as both could signal either complacency or a delayed reaction to fundamentals. The absence of clear herd behavior suggests individual traders are acting on disparate signals rather than collective momentum.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:21 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
""BorgWarner published its 2026 Sustainability Report, 'Powering Tomorrow,' highlighting the company's continued progress on its sustainability goals and initiatives in support of its vision of a clean, energy-efficient world.""
""The intrinsic value estimate from a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) approach points to undervaluation, yet market-based multiples suggest the shares screen on the expensive side.""
""BorgWarner's foundational product portfolio supports a durable earnings base, while its turbin..."
""Vice President Isabelle McKenzie sold 4,500 shares in August 2026 and retained 53,328 shares valued at about US$3.70 million.""
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 11/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some investors seeing cautious opportunity while others flag it as a high-risk or overvalued proposition. Charles Mackay’s high score suggests the stock lacks obvious crowd-driven mania, but most value-oriented frameworks—like Graham’s or Fisher’s—reject it outright, citing either statistical cheapness or a lack of quality/growth traits. Meanwhile, cyclical or trend-following approaches (e.g., Livermore, Nelson) warn of overbought conditions or a mid-cycle risk, while efficient-market theorists dismiss it as unworthy of active selection. The contrast highlights a tension between those who prioritize relative safety (e.g., Marks, Bagehot) and those who demand clear growth or defensive characteristics (e.g., Lynch, Fisher), leaving the stock in a gray zone where only a few methodologies would even consider it.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 90
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 82
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 60
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 56
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 52
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 49
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 43
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 38
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 31
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 18
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 11
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$60.07
Range Bottom
$70.98
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
18.7%
Operating Margin
3.7%
Net Margin
1.9%
EBITDA Margin
8.8%
ROE
5.1%
ROA
2.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.29
Cash
$2.31B
Total Debt
$3.90B
Current Ratio
2.07
Debt/Equity
0.72
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.9.2026 | $0.170 |
| 1.6.2026 | $0.170 |
| 31.5.2026 | $0.170 |
| 2.3.2026 | $0.170 |
| 1.3.2026 | $0.170 |
| 1.12.2025 | $0.170 |
| 30.11.2025 | $0.170 |
| 2.9.2025 | $0.170 |
| 1.9.2025 | $0.170 |
| 2.6.2025 | $0.110 |
| 1.6.2025 | $0.110 |
| 3.3.2025 | $0.110 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$25.15
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$13.83
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 3 neutral, 12 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Trefis · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Motley Fool · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
PR Newswire · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Fintel · 1.9.2026
BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 36/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BWA currently scores 36/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
BWA's technical score is 26/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 2.07; Price is above the 200-day average; Current ratio: 2.07.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.39 (3y annualized return 15.4% / max drawdown 39.8%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -14.7%.
Yes — BWA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 1 purchases and 18 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanley Michael S | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $65.51 |
| CALAWAY TONIT M | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 73,831 | -22,000 | $66.26 |
| CALAWAY TONIT M | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 22,000 | -22,000 | $66.26 |
| Kalathur Rajesh | Open Market Purchase | 19.8.2026 | 7,407 | +7,407 | $67.59 |
| Kulikowski Amy B. | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 2,900 | -2,900 | $68.60 |
| McAlmont Shaun | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 7,000 | -7,000 | $69.36 |
| CALAWAY TONIT M | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 26,624 | -26,624 | $69.44 |
| McKenzie Isabelle | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 4,500 | -4,500 | $70.39 |
| Demmerle Stefan | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $70.00 |
| CALAWAY TONIT M | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 17,376 | -17,376 | $69.97 |
| CALAWAY TONIT M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 68,854 | -68,854 | $66.40 |
| CALAWAY TONIT M | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 3,593 | +3,593 | — |
| CALAWAY TONIT M | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 208,506 | +3,593 | — |
| CALAWAY TONIT M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 139,652 | -68,854 | $66.40 |
| CALAWAY TONIT M | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 208,845 | +3,932 | — |
| CALAWAY TONIT M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 139,831 | -69,014 | $66.40 |
| Shankar Sailaja | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $73.08 |
| Shankar Sailaja | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 12,897 | -5,000 | $73.08 |
| Weng Volker | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $72.35 |
| Weng Volker | Open Market Sale | 28.5.2026 | 80,002 | -5,000 | $72.35 |
| Weng Volker | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $67.71 |
| Weng Volker | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 85,002 | -5,000 | $67.71 |
| Demmerle Stefan | Open Market Sale | 13.5.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $65.00 |
| Fadool Joseph F. | Open Market Sale | 13.5.2026 | 29,000 | -29,000 | $67.31 |
| Fadool Joseph F. | Open Market Sale | 13.5.2026 | 405,964 | -29,000 | $67.31 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
8,682,052 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,833,006 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology