Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$84.10
▼ $1.12 (-1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/19 09:51 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$83.43 - $84.29
52-Week Range
$70.57 - $99.29
Beta
—
Next Earnings
16.11.2026
Support
$83.43
Resistance
$99.25
BRC is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+2.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 25.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $75.28 vs. price $84.10 (-10.5%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (62/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
10
Risk
62
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
77
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Brady Corporation highlights its strong financial performance and strategic growth initiatives. The company reported record revenue and earnings in Q4 2026, driven by organic growth and the recent acquisition of Honeywell’s PSS business, which is expected to reshape its future expansion. Brady also announced a 41st consecutive annual dividend increase to $1.00, reinforcing its reputation as a reliable dividend growth stock. Analysts noted Q2 2026 revenue growth of 10% year-over-year, though segment margins faced pressure. Overall, Brady’s focus remains on shareholder returns and strategic acquisitions amid sustained profitability.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Brady Corporation. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
96
Fundamentals
77
Technical
10
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (77) reflects traders’ fixation on the 1.2% proximity to support, overriding contradictory signals like oversold RSI (29) and negative momentum. The narrative gap (23) further suggests a disconnect between reality (42) and overoptimistic expectations (65), consistent with euphoria (21) and overconfidence (16). The key question is whether traders will hold or abandon this anchor if price tests support, given the lack of fundamental justification for the +18% DCF premium. Extreme sentiment (100/100) may amplify either anchoring or panic if momentum reverses.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:21 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"announced it has raised its dividend for the 41st consecutive year"
"posts sixth consecutive year of record earnings"
"Honeywell PSS acquisition set to drive future expansion"
"organic growth and margin expansion in printer and specialty adhesive-material sales"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for BRC reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s near-perfect score and 'oversold' verdict suggest he sees a cyclical rebound opportunity, prioritizing technical positioning over fundamentals. In contrast, the 'buy-and-hold for a decade' candidates—Smith, Housel, and Veblen—focus on long-term value creation and growth alignment, scoring mid-to-high but cautioning that the stock may already reflect its potential. Meanwhile, Graham’s low score and defensive criteria failures highlight his strict margin-of-safety approach, while Livermore and Marks (cycle) dismiss it as either trendless or mid-cycle, favoring clarity and timing over speculative potential. Even Fisher’s lower score underscores his preference for exceptional quality, leaving this stock as a 'solid but not elite' pick.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 81
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 76
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 75
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 73
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 72
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 68
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 68
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 62
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 53
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 38
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 12
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
51.7%
Operating Margin
15.9%
Net Margin
12.4%
EBITDA Margin
18.6%
ROE
15.1%
ROA
11.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$187.15M
Total Debt
$14.98M
Current Ratio
1.94
Debt/Equity
0.01
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.7.2026 | $0.245 |
| 9.7.2026 | $0.245 |
| 9.4.2026 | $0.245 |
| 8.4.2026 | $0.245 |
| 9.1.2026 | $0.245 |
| 8.1.2026 | $0.245 |
| 10.10.2025 | $0.245 |
| 9.10.2025 | $0.245 |
| 10.7.2025 | $0.240 |
| 9.7.2025 | $0.240 |
| 9.4.2025 | $0.240 |
| 8.4.2025 | $0.240 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$84.10
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$75.28
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-10.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
7.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.8% | $207.64M | $190.49M |
| 2 | 6.5% | $221.04M | $186.05M |
| 3 | 5.1% | $232.40M | $179.46M |
| 4 | 3.8% | $241.28M | $170.93M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $247.31M | $160.73M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$192.65M
Terminal Value
$3.90B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.53B
Enterprise Value
$3.42B
Net Debt
$-172.16M
Equity Value
$3.59B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$28.43
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$12.02
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Motley Fool · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Moby · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
MarketBeat · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
Brady Corporation (BRC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BRC currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BRC's estimated fair value is $75.28, which is 10.5% below the current price of $84.10. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BRC's technical score is 10/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 25.4%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.01.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $75.28 vs. price $84.10 (-10.5%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — BRC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bojarski Olivier | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 5,483 | -5,483 | $90.69 |
| DeBruine Thomas F | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 1,769 | -1,769 | $90.69 |
| Gorman Andrew | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 2,532 | -2,532 | $90.69 |
| Gorman Andrew | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 5,389 | +5,389 | — |
| Thornton Ann | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 11,545 | +11,545 | — |
| Bojarski Olivier | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 11,666 | +11,666 | — |
| DeBruine Thomas F | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 3,765 | +3,765 | — |
| Thornton Ann | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 5,426 | -5,426 | $90.69 |
| Thornton Ann | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 1,579 | +1,579 | — |
| Gorman Andrew | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 1,053 | +1,053 | — |
| DeBruine Thomas F | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 1,053 | +1,053 | — |
| Thornton Ann | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 30,514 | +1,579 | — |
| Gorman Andrew | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 15,206 | +1,053 | — |
| DeBruine Thomas F | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.8.2026 | 11,266 | +1,053 | — |
| ALLENDER PATRICK W | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.7.2026 | 267 | +267 | $91.94 |
| ALLENDER PATRICK W | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.7.2026 | 101,667 | +267 | $91.94 |
| Nargolwala Vineet A | Open Market Purchase | 10.6.2026 | 13,011 | +13,011 | $76.86 |
| Nargolwala Vineet A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 25,684 | +25,684 | — |
| Nargolwala Vineet A | Open Market Purchase | 10.6.2026 | 52,709 | +13,011 | $76.86 |
| Nargolwala Vineet A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 78,393 | +25,684 | — |
| Bojarski Olivier | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 15,506 | +15,506 | — |
| Nargolwala Vineet A | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 39,698 | +39,698 | — |
| Bojarski Olivier | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 35,957 | +15,506 | — |
| Nargolwala Vineet A | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 39,698 | +39,698 | — |
| ALLENDER PATRICK W | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.4.2026 | 304 | +304 | $80.22 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
736,496 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 696,463 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 77.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology