Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$28.14
▼ $0.36 (-1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 02:26 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$1.64B
Day Range
$27.71 - $28.50
52-Week Range
$24.70 - $59.57
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$27.17
Resistance
$34.70
BL is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-48.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $45.96 vs. price $28.14 (+63.3%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 5.2% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
34
Quality
58
Value
57
Momentum
23
Risk
34
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
46
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of BlackLine, Inc. has centered on its stock performance and a product-related announcement. Investors have noted a decline in BlackLine’s shares, with a 11.7% drop over six months, contrasting with broader market gains. Meanwhile, the company made headlines for achieving PCI DSS compliance validation for its PCI Detokenization Service, highlighting its expansion into supporting complex financial workflows, particularly for high-volume payment card reconciliations.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about BlackLine, Inc.. News trend score: 68. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
22
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
31
Fundamentals
46
Technical
23
Valuation
57
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+5%
Market Narrative
27
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
-14
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests a mixed but predominantly cautious *FOMO* dynamic, where positive momentum and sentiment attract buyers despite undervaluation. The narrative gap (narrativeScore 46 vs. realityScore 41) hints at a disconnect where optimism may overstate fundamentals. Overconfidence is muted by valuation gaps, and no panic or herding signals emerge. The key question: *Will momentum sustain despite the valuation discrepancy?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:19 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"BlackLine’s shares (currently trading at $32.29) have posted a disappointing 11.7% loss, well below the S&P 500’s 12% gain."
"BlackLine shares plummeted after a sharp jump in Treasury yields and crude oil prices stoked inflation concerns."
"BlackLine announced PCI DSS compliance validation for its PCI Detokenization Service, enabling high-volume payment card reconciliations."
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with scores ranging from a cautious 71 (Charles Mackay’s lack of crowd mania warning) down to a decisive 0 (Morgan Housel’s volatility red flag). The more conservative voices—like Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, and Gerald Loeb—dismiss it outright, citing weak defensive metrics, missing growth signatures, or unacceptable risk profiles, while others like Howard Marks and Jesse Livermore hedge their stance with mixed signals, questioning whether the stock’s fundamentals justify its valuation. Meanwhile, Walter Bagehot and Samuel Nelson warn of liquidity risks and overbought conditions, framing it as a speculative bet rather than a disciplined hold. The contrast underscores a tension between those who see *any* merit in the stock’s business (e.g., Mackay’s neutral take) and those who view it as a high-risk, volatile play—hardly a fit for patient, rule-bound investors.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 92
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 91
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 71
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 42
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 42
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 34
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 29
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 28
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 24
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 23
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 21
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 9
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$27.17
Range Bottom
$34.70
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
75.2%
Operating Margin
3.6%
Net Margin
3.5%
EBITDA Margin
10.3%
ROE
7.4%
ROA
1.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.40
Cash
$390.03M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.47
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$28.14
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$45.96
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+63.3%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.3% | $178.06M | $163.35M |
| 2 | 8.3% | $192.86M | $162.33M |
| 3 | 6.4% | $205.16M | $158.42M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $214.27M | $151.79M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $219.63M | $142.74M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$161.49M
Terminal Value
$3.46B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.25B
Enterprise Value
$3.03B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$3.03B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$5.04
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$2.77
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 7 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 18.9.2026
StockStory · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
StockStory · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
StockStory · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
BlackLine, Inc. (BL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BL currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BL's estimated fair value is $45.96, which is 63.3% above the current price of $28.14. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BL's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $45.96 vs. price $28.14 (+63.3%); Operating margin is stable or improving over time; +3.1% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 5.2% of price; Calmar: -0.32 (3y annualized return -20.1% / max drawdown 63.2%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -73.1%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BL.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Villanova Patrick | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.9.2026 | 750 | -750 | — |
| Villanova Patrick | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 2.9.2026 | 750 | +750 | $14.00 |
| Stalick Michelle D | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 34,712 | -780 | $33.65 |
| Stalick Michelle D | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 780 | -780 | $33.65 |
| Tucker Therese | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 0 | -26,560 | — |
| Tucker Therese | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 424,997 | +70,000 | $14.00 |
| Tucker Therese | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 451,557 | +26,560 | $14.00 |
| Tucker Therese | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 381,557 | -70,000 | $31.96 |
| Tucker Therese | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 26,560 | -70,000 | — |
| Tucker Therese | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 70,000 | -70,000 | — |
| Tucker Therese | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 70,000 | -70,000 | $31.96 |
| Tucker Therese | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 26,560 | -26,560 | — |
| Tucker Therese | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 26,560 | +26,560 | $14.00 |
| Tucker Therese | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 70,000 | +70,000 | $14.00 |
| Van Houten Stuart | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 106,966 | -1,720 | $31.92 |
| Duan Jimmy C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 120,658 | -1,190 | $31.92 |
| Villanova Patrick | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 131,062 | -1,200 | $31.92 |
| Morgan-Prager Karole | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 160,209 | -1,063 | $31.92 |
| Duan Jimmy C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 119,907 | -751 | $31.92 |
| Stalick Michelle D | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 35,794 | -265 | $31.92 |
| Villanova Patrick | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 132,562 | -260 | $31.92 |
| Morgan-Prager Karole | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 162,156 | -778 | $31.92 |
| Ung Jeremy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 134,805 | -876 | $31.92 |
| Ryan Owen | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 395,376 | -2,235 | $31.92 |
| Ung Jeremy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 135,681 | -1,388 | $31.92 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,836,597 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,596,377 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
48.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 38.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology