Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$381.83
▼ $2.13 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:44 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$36.04B
Day Range
$379.54 - $385.82
52-Week Range
$230.45 - $413.25
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$364.49
Resistance
$413.25
+45.8% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 8/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 2.16 (3y annualized return 41.1% / max drawdown 19.0%)
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
69
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 17, 2026
Then
74
$381.14
Now
69
$381.83
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
64
Risk
58
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Credicorp Ltd. highlights its strong position in Peru’s financial sector, particularly its growth in digital lending as the country transitions to a cash-based economy. Analysts have adjusted their fair value estimates upward for its subsidiary Bapcor (ASX:BAP), citing improved valuation assumptions despite lingering execution risks. The company also announced a strategic update event in November, signaling ongoing efforts to expand its ecosystem advantages across Peru, Chile, Colombia, Bolivia, Panama, and the U.S. Financial reports indicate a turnaround in working capital and trade growth, though statutory losses persist due to impairments.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Credicorp Ltd.. News trend score: 86. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
21
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
47
Fundamentals
—
Technical
64
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-0%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for BAP suggests a dominant herd mentality, where traders align with peers’ moves (-0.3% daily) rather than independent analysis. FOMO and mild euphoria coexist due to positive momentum and sentiment, but anchoring and loss aversion remain negligible. The key open question is whether this herd behavior reflects a shared view or a lack of conviction, given the narrative gap (65 vs. 50). If sentiment shifts or momentum falters, herd dynamics could reverse abruptly.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:12 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Credicorp stands out as Peru’s dominant banking franchise, consistently delivering enviable growth and outsized returns."
"Bapcor Ltd reports a statutory loss due to impairments, but strong working capital management and returning trade growth signal a successful turnaround."
"Credicorp’s senior management will discuss how the Group’s ecosystem advantage scales across Peru, Chile, Colombia, Bolivia, Panama, and the US."
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 59/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here reveal a stark divide between those that see potential in this stock and those that flag significant risks or insufficient data. Edgar Lawrence Smith’s near-perfect score suggests he would have been intrigued by the dividend or growth potential, while Charles Mackay’s moderate excitement hints at early signs of speculative crowd behavior. In contrast, the majority—including Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot—lack sufficient data to form a definitive opinion, leaving their verdicts neutral at best. Meanwhile, more cyclical or contrarian thinkers like Marks, Housel, and Schwager warn of overvaluation or late-stage risks, with Veblen and Nelson sounding the loudest alarms about speculative excesses or stretched market conditions. The split underscores whether this stock is a hidden gem (Smith) or a speculative bubble (Veblen/Nelson) waiting to burst.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 59
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 54
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 48
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 42
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 34
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 25
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 18.5.2026 | $14.276 |
| 17.5.2026 | $14.276 |
| 19.5.2025 | $11.011 |
| 18.5.2025 | $11.011 |
| 23.9.2024 | $2.917 |
| 22.9.2024 | $2.917 |
| 17.5.2024 | $9.288 |
| 16.5.2024 | $9.288 |
| 18.5.2023 | $6.775 |
| 17.5.2023 | $6.775 |
| 19.5.2022 | $3.994 |
| 18.5.2022 | $3.994 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 6 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
The Fly · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
MT Newswires · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 26.8.2026
Motley Fool · 25.8.2026
TMX Newsfile · 25.8.2026
Yahoo Personal Finance · 25.8.2026
TheStreet · 25.8.2026
MT Newswires · 25.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for BAP specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
BAP's technical score is 64/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 2.16 (3y annualized return 41.1% / max drawdown 19.0%); Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; -2.2% over the last 3 months relative to the index; CMF 20 days: -0.12.
Yes — BAP has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 4 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cavero Diego Antonio | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 3,500 | -3,500 | $319.00 |
| Cavero Diego Antonio | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 7,307 | -3,500 | $319.00 |
| Perez-Reyes Alejandro | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 1,073 | -1,073 | $337.50 |
| Perez-Reyes Alejandro | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 1,745 | -1,073 | $337.50 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,254,178 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,052,920 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
32.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 25.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology