Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$103.29
▲ $0.93 (+0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/19 10:08 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$52.16B
Day Range
$100.11 - $103.29
52-Week Range
$62.55 - $129.14
Beta
—
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
Support
$73.40
Resistance
$123.39
+59.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 70.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.0% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/10/202666
This Week
70
7D Ago
↓ -4
Weakening
Technical
52
7D Ago: 62
↓ -10
Fundamental
83
7D Ago: 83
→ 0
Growth
74
7D Ago: 74
→ 0
Valuation
50
7D Ago: 50
→ 0
News
92
7D Ago: 98
↓ -6
Quality
55
7D Ago: 55
→ 0
Risk
54
7D Ago: 70
↓ -16
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
66
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
66 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
74
$123.39
Now
66
$103.29
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
55
Value
50
Momentum
52
Risk
54
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
83
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of AngloGold Ashanti PLC has centered on its strong stock performance and investor optimism. Over the past five years, the company’s shares have surged sevenfold, with analysts rating it a "Buy" and highlighting its undervalued valuation despite recent gains. Additionally, the appointment of Jasper Musadaidzwa—formerly a senior executive at AngloGold Ashanti—as CEO of Kavango, a subsidiary, marked a notable leadership transition. The focus also included discussions on dividends, buybacks, and the company’s role in gold mining as a hedge against economic uncertainty.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about AngloGold Ashanti PLC. News trend score: 92. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
21
Fundamentals
83
Technical
52
Valuation
50
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+14%
Market Narrative
56
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+15
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a disconnect between extreme positive sentiment (98/100) and weak price momentum (-6.3% ROC), consistent with detached euphoria rather than active panic or FOMO. The 16.3% premium above the 200-day average, despite negative momentum, implies investors may be anchored to recent highs or overconfident in fundamentals. The key open question is whether this narrative gap (56 vs. 41) reflects unrealistic expectations or a delayed reaction to weaker price action. The absence of herding or loss aversion suggests a fragmented or speculative-driven mindset.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:38 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"The average brokerage recommendation (ABR) for AngloGold Ashanti (AU) is equivalent to a Buy."
"Anglogold Ashanti has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 36.46% on an annualized basis."
"AngloGold Ashanti has delivered a very strong share price run... yet current valuation checks still point to the stock trading below an internally estimated intrinsic value."
"Gold miners fall 1.9% and Bitcoin proxies sell off after August payrolls beat by 106,000, pushing September Fed hike odds."
📈 18D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Philip Fisher — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 28/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-focused and value-oriented methodologies. Fisher, Lynch, and Smith—all bullish on high-quality, long-term growth—unanimously rate it as an exceptional or undervalued opportunity, praising its potential for sustained expansion and alignment with their 'buy-and-hold' principles. Meanwhile, Bagehot’s high score reflects robust liquidity, reinforcing its resilience in turbulent markets, while Nelson and Loeb see it as a cyclical or capital-preservation play. However, the divide widens when contrasting these optimists with Marks, Mackay, and the efficient-market camp: Marks flags potential overvaluation, Mackay warns of crowd-driven hype, and the efficient-market theorists dismiss it as unproven against passive indexing. Even Graham’s traditional value filters fail to confirm it, while his 'Enterprising Investor' variant rejects it outright for lacking sufficient margin of safety. The middle-ground methodologies—Livermore, Schwager, and Housel—remain neutral, unable to discern a decisive edge, highlighting the stock’s polarizing nature between growth enthusiasts and skeptics.
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 100
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 96
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 76
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 70
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 64
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 58
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 51
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 42
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 41
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 28
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
49.3%
Operating Margin
41.8%
Net Margin
26.7%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
32.6%
ROA
17.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.19
Cash
$2.90B
Total Debt
$2.04B
Current Ratio
2.87
Debt/Equity
0.28
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 21.8.2026 | $0.720 |
| 29.5.2026 | $1.160 |
| 28.5.2026 | $1.160 |
| 13.3.2026 | $1.730 |
| 12.3.2026 | $1.730 |
| 28.11.2025 | $0.910 |
| 27.11.2025 | $0.910 |
| 22.8.2025 | $0.800 |
| 21.8.2025 | $0.800 |
| 30.5.2025 | $0.125 |
| 29.5.2025 | $0.125 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.690 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$16.02
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$16.01
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 5 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
ChartMill · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Fintel · 10.9.2026
AngloGold Ashanti PLC (AU) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 66/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AU currently scores 66/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AU's technical score is 52/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 70.8%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 122.3%; Net income growth: 202.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.0% of price; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — AU has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 19 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Busia Kojo Osei Frimpong | Open Market Sale | 19.5.2026 | 400 | -400 | $89.09 |
| Garner Albert Headden | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| Tilk Jochen Erhard | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 2,371 | +2,371 | — |
| Randolph Marcus Philip | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| Ferguson Alan Murray | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| MAGIE JINHEE | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| Cleaver Bruce Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| Newton-King Nicola | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| Sands Diana L | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| Busia Kojo Osei Frimpong | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| Sands Diana L | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| MAGIE JINHEE | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| Tilk Jochen Erhard | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 2,371 | +2,371 | — |
| Busia Kojo Osei Frimpong | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| Ferguson Alan Murray | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| Garner Albert Headden | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| Randolph Marcus Philip | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| Newton-King Nicola | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
| Cleaver Bruce Alan | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.5.2026 | 1,580 | +1,580 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,149,659 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,507,988 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
51.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology