Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$187.82
▼ $3.81 (-2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/21 07:44 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$25.58B
Day Range
$187.25 - $193.17
52-Week Range
$75.02 - $243.57
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$174.77
Resistance
$243.57
ATI is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+138.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.6% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
59
Quality
63
Value
45
Momentum
26
Risk
54
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
75
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage of ATI Inc. centers on its strong aerospace‑defense momentum, highlighted by a record $4.4 billion backlog, higher margins and a 64 % YTD share rally. Analysts discuss valuation pressures, cash‑flow sustainability and an analyst‑set missile budget that is not yet law. The company’s upcoming appearance at Morgan Stanley’s 14th Annual Laguna Conference will showcase its aerospace exposure, recent acquisitions and supply‑chain challenges, while analysts note potential undervaluation amid robust demand.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about ATI Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
27
Fundamentals
75
Technical
26
Valuation
45
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-5%
Market Narrative
51
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+9
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests **herding** is dominant, as ATI’s underperformance relative to peers today (despite positive sentiment) indicates a coordinated pullback. The narrative gap (61 vs. 42) hints at overoptimism, while euphoria persists due to the 16.9% premium over the 200-day average. Overconfidence may linger, given the EPS growth outpacing price momentum. The key question: *Will the positive sentiment sustain despite the relative underperformance?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:15 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"made it to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) growth stocks list"
"ATI, Astronics, and Ducommun each posted record backlogs amid rising defense spending"
"management raised its full-year guidance for 2026... anticipated a favorable momentum to persist"
"ATI stock has delivered a very large 5-year gain... trading at a premium despite strong share price history"
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 31/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s divergent verdicts reflect stark contrasts between methodologies prioritizing stability, growth, and valuation. The highest-scoring approaches—Bagehot’s liquidity focus, Veblen’s real-value alignment, and Nelson’s cyclical positioning—suggest it may weather volatility or benefit from sector trends, while the mid-tier scores (Loeb’s moderate risk, Marks’ mixed assessment) hint at cautious optimism tempered by potential overvaluation. Conversely, the lower-scoring frameworks—from Fisher’s quality skepticism to Lynch’s growth-at-a-price test—reject it outright, framing it as speculative or lacking the fundamentals they demand. Even Graham’s defensive and enterprising models dismiss it as too risky or statistically overpriced, underscoring a clear divide between those who see resilience or opportunity and those who view it as a speculative gamble.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 80
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 72
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 64
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 59
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 54
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 42
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 41
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 40
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 34
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
22.0%
Operating Margin
14.0%
Net Margin
8.8%
EBITDA Margin
17.6%
ROE
22.4%
ROA
7.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.92
Cash
$416.70M
Total Debt
$31.10M
Current Ratio
2.66
Debt/Equity
0.02
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$12.73
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$11.14
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 7 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
StockStory · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Zacks · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Zacks · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Zacks · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
PR Newswire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
ATI Inc. (ATI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ATI currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ATI's technical score is 26/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 22.4% — strong; Debt/equity: 0.02.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.6% of price; Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ATI.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harris Timothy J | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 16,500 | -16,500 | $207.54 |
| Morehouse David J | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 2,485 | -2,485 | $201.61 |
| Harris Timothy J | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 16,500 | -16,500 | $210.01 |
| Harris Timothy J | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 146,687 | -16,500 | $206.92 |
| Harris Timothy J | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 16,500 | -16,500 | $206.92 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $229.56 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 9,116 | -9,116 | $231.72 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 8,131 | -8,131 | $230.66 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 4,598 | -4,598 | $232.43 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $228.32 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 28.7.2026 | 31,757 | -31,757 | $190.99 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 28.7.2026 | 125,564 | -31,757 | $190.99 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 400 | -400 | $187.50 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 200 | -200 | $186.36 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 388 | -388 | $185.10 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 15,908 | -15,908 | $183.50 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 4,878 | -4,878 | $184.34 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 200 | -200 | $180.85 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 2,200 | -2,200 | $181.36 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 11,826 | -11,826 | $182.66 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $180.00 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $179.25 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 195,321 | -2,000 | $179.25 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 193,321 | -2,000 | $180.00 |
| Fields Kimberly A | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 193,121 | -200 | $180.85 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,700,619 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,685,690 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
47.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology