Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$0.70
▲ $0.01 (+1.4%)
Market data updated: 09/19 04:04 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$12.58M
Day Range
$0.65 - $0.70
52-Week Range
$0.35 - $1.87
Beta
—
Next Earnings
11.11.2026
Support
$0.35
Resistance
$1.36
-29.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 1.70
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -26.1% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
42
Value
55
Momentum
63
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
30
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Aterian, Inc. has centered on its upcoming shareholder vote and corporate restructuring efforts. The company has repeatedly urged stockholders to support proposals for an asset sale, emphasizing that just over 285,000 votes—or 2.7% of shareholders—could determine its financial future. Proxy advisors have also endorsed the asset sale, while Aterian announced the mailing of proxy materials for a special stockholder meeting in June 2026. No earnings or operational updates were highlighted beyond these shareholder-focused developments.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Aterian, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
46
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
34
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
30
Technical
63
Valuation
55
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-50%
Market Narrative
88
Fundamental Reality
34
Narrative Gap
+54
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant overconfidence (score: 100) stems from a disconnect between price momentum (+69.5%) and stagnant fundamentals (-0.4% EPS growth). FOMO (88) and euphoria (43) are secondary, driven by overbought conditions (RSI 75) and elevated volume. Confirmation bias (47) persists due to a narrative-reality gap (+36), while loss aversion (50) hints at residual caution from prior declines. The key question: *Will traders sustain momentum despite deteriorating fundamentals?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:34 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Only 285,000 votes or 2.7% separates stockholders from securing value"
"Both leading independent proxy advisors recommend Aterian stockholders vote for the asset sale"
"Aterian Urges Stockholders to Vote 'FOR' All Proposals at the Upcoming Special Meeting"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits historical methodologies into two starkly opposing camps: the deep-value and disciplined traders, who see strong potential, versus the cautious, cycle-sensitive, and market-efficiency adherents, who flag serious red flags. Benjamin Graham’s Enterprising Investor model scores near-perfect (96), viewing it as a statistical bargain, while Jack Schwager (82) and even Defensive Graham (77) back it as a disciplined, high-reward setup. In contrast, Howard Marks (69-74) sees it as reasonably priced but not overextended, suggesting a mid-cycle play—though others like Nelson (19) and Veblen (12) warn of overbought conditions or speculative excess. Meanwhile, the most bearish voices—from Loeb (31) to Housel (0)—highlight liquidity risks, volatility, and lack of stability, while Fisher (7) and Lynch (8) dismiss it outright for failing to meet their growth or quality thresholds. The divide reflects whether the stock’s fundamentals justify aggressive value investing or if its volatility and speculative traits make it a high-risk gamble.
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 96
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 77
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 68
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 59
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 51
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 45
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 31
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 19
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 17
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 8
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 4 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
56.8%
Operating Margin
-26.1%
Net Margin
-27.5%
EBITDA Margin
-23.7%
ROE
-124.8%
ROA
-64.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$2.39
Cash
$4.86M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.70
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$0.70
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$18.23
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-10.40M | $-9.54M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-10.07M | $-8.48M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-9.95M | $-7.68M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-10.01M | $-7.09M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-10.26M | $-6.67M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-10.95M
Terminal Value
$-161.80M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-105.16M
Enterprise Value
$-144.62M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-144.62M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1.92
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.37
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 9 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
ChartMill · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
ChartMill · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Associated Press · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
ChartMill · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
ChartMill · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.8.2026
Associated Press · 14.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 13.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 6.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 18.6.2026
Aterian, Inc. (ATER) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ATER currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ATER's technical score is 63/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 1.70; Price is above the 50-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -26.1% (negative); Net margin: -27.5% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ATER.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lazar David E. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 4.8.2026 | 875,000 | -875,000 | — |
| Lazar David E. | Conversion of Derivative Security | 4.8.2026 | 875,000 | +875,000 | $2.00 |
| Lazar David E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.7.2026 | 1,750,000 | +1,750,000 | $2.00 |
| Rodriguez Arturo | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 70,000 | +70,000 | — |
| Rodriguez Arturo | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,081,148 | +70,000 | — |
| Lazar David E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.4.2026 | 1,750,000 | +1,750,000 | — |
| Lazar David E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.4.2026 | 1,750,000 | +1,750,000 | — |
| Harlam Bari A | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.1.2026 | 24,731 | +24,731 | — |
| Rodriguez Arturo | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.1.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | — |
| Lattmann Susan E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.1.2026 | 25,555 | +25,555 | — |
| Feldman Joshua O | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.1.2026 | 120,000 | +120,000 | — |
| KURTZ WILLIAM | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.1.2026 | 40,394 | +40,394 | — |
| KURTZ WILLIAM | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.1.2026 | 155,922 | +40,394 | — |
| Rodriguez Arturo | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.1.2026 | 1,011,148 | +50,000 | — |
| Lattmann Susan E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.1.2026 | 162,465 | +25,555 | — |
| Harlam Bari A | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.1.2026 | 161,991 | +24,731 | — |
| Feldman Joshua O | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.1.2026 | 497,442 | +120,000 | — |
| Lattmann Susan E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2025 | 78,034 | +78,034 | — |
| Harlam Bari A | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2025 | 78,034 | +78,034 | — |
| KURTZ WILLIAM | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2025 | 78,034 | +78,034 | — |
| KURTZ WILLIAM | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2025 | 115,528 | +78,034 | — |
| Lattmann Susan E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2025 | 136,910 | +78,034 | — |
| Harlam Bari A | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2025 | 137,260 | +78,034 | — |
| Zahut Roi Zion | Open Market Sale | 13.6.2025 | 3,900 | -3,900 | $1.23 |
| Feldman Joshua O | Open Market Sale | 13.6.2025 | 1,254 | -1,254 | $1.23 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
216,312 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 364,043 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
31.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 42.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology